Well... you might look at Overseer.java. If you recall, we talked about
ways of using the Overseer less. But this shows what it's doing today,
which is a lot.
Perhaps you might prefer learning about Apache Curator and then look
through our use of ZooKeeper. Our use of ZK is sometimes direct
On 11/21/2019 12:12 PM, David Smiley wrote:
*Attended by*: Andrzej Bialecki, Anshum Gupta, Cassandra Targett, Chris
Hostetter, David Smiley, Erick Erickson, Gus Heck, Ishan Chattopadhyaya,
Jan Hoydahl, Jason Gerlowski, Mike D. (Apple), Noble Paul, Shawn Heisey,
Scott Blum, Tomas F. Lobbe,
The meeting notes are now appended to the meeting agenda page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2019-11+Meeting+on+SolrCloud+and+project+health
I'll paste that part here for convenience but it's formatted nicer online:
Meeting Notes
*Attended by*: Andrzej Bialecki, Anshum Gupta,
No problem in deferring the Gradle discussion. I’m getting into it a little
deeper so I’ll know more about how close it is to prime-time as time passes..
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 11:04 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>
> What's the medium for this? Is somebody going to make a
> webex/zoom/meet/whatever
Google Hangout. (see my first email of this thread)
I'll create/send the invite shortly. It'll be for 1.5 hours, though I
understand not everyone can attend for that long.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:05
What's the medium for this? Is somebody going to make a
webex/zoom/meet/whatever link? I'd like to make sure I have the right tools
installed and will do my best to join from airport wifi.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 2:49 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> I view Jörn’s SIP proposal as a way for tighter gate
I view Jörn’s SIP proposal as a way for tighter gate keeping of future major
changes, helping maintain hard fought stability and speed.
Jan Høydahl
> 18. nov. 2019 kl. 06:26 skrev David Smiley :
>
>
> This particular committer's meeting has a particular subject/theme. So as
> Erick
This particular committer's meeting has a particular subject/theme. So as
Erick indicated, while all committers are invited, I think if you're not
interested in the subject then I'm sure you can find a better use of your
time. The "Solr Implementation Proposal" could fit in I suppose, but not
Jan, I think that is something that merits its own mail thread or jira for
broader community participation.
On Mon, 18 Nov, 2019, 5:19 AM Jan Høydahl, wrote:
> I added this bullet point under "Community":
>
>
>- Should we adopt a formal decision process for proposing major
>changes/APIs
I added this bullet point under "Community":
Should we adopt a formal decision process for proposing major changes/APIs to
Solr, aka "Solr Implementation Proposal (SIP)"?
See proposal from Jörn Franke in dev@
Lucene devs are always welcome, and some of the people attending work on Lucene
as well. This is mostly a Solr issue though. There are two outcomes that
directly affect Lucene I can think of offhand:
1> moving to the Gradle build, which irrelevant if the consensus is to treat
that effort
Does it make sense for Lucene committers to attend?
On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 at 20:20, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> David:
>
> I may be able to attend, but perhaps only via keyboard. It depends on when
> I get back from an appointment in time. If I don’t make it back in time,
> here’s some grist for the
David:
I may be able to attend, but perhaps only via keyboard. It depends on when I
get back from an appointment in time. If I don’t make it back in time, here’s
some grist for the mill.
Can we add an item for the Gradle build effort? I’m curious what people think
about that effort and
The meeting will be held on Wednesday at 11am PST (2pm EST). I'll send a
calendar invite tomorrow to those that used the Doodle poll.
The agenda is here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2019-11+Meeting+on+SolrCloud+and+project+health
Edit it if you wish. If you can't (e.g. you
I am proposing a virtual "Solr committer meeting" next week to discuss the
concerns and ideas Mark Miller has raised recently. The scope of
conversation of this one is not the other wonderful things people are
working on (e.g. new plugins architecture), though I would *love* to have
future
15 matches
Mail list logo
