Right. Now I just need to become a committer. :-)
Regards,
Alex
On 07/04/2014 8:01 pm, "Grant Ingersoll" wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2014, at 11:35 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> wrote:
>
> 7. Setup proper analytics (is there any?), so we could at least tell
> what people find and what they do not.
On Apr 6, 2014, at 11:35 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
>> 7. Setup proper analytics (is there any?), so we could at least tell
>> what people find and what they do not.
>
> I know this has come up before. I think there is a legal issue with
> using free analytics tools such as Google Analyt
Follow-up in-line.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> 2. Mark it as Google non-crawlable in robot.txt
>
> Don't do that. Setting up a permanent
How do we plan to redirect? If I reached a specific page in the wiki after
searching in Google and now tog forward me to the home page of cwiki ?
Isn't it better to give links at the top of the page to relevant sections
in cwiki (as much add possible)
I'm +1 for locking the old wiki down
On 7 Apr 2
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 08:35 +0200, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
> > 5. Do something about JavaDocs polluting Google Index. At minimum,
> > create /latest/ as a stable URL path and have it very Google visible.
> > Make the rest of the
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> While I somewhat agree with both the points of Furkan and Alexandre, I am
>> not sure which way you are leaning:
>
> If somebody had time/money/permission, that's what I would
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> While I somewhat agree with both the points of Furkan and Alexandre, I am
> not sure which way you are leaning:
If somebody had time/money/permission, that's what I would do
1. Migrate wiki to an archive area in bulk and freeze - do not del
> Main question: Should we
> [] Lock down the Solr Wiki sooner rather than later and put all focus on
> adding to and improving the Ref Guide
+1
And put 301 redirects to cwiki for as many of the old pages as possible.
Can we have a new Confluence space where non-committers are allowed to shar
+1 to making the CWiki the One True Source (tm) for Solr documentation.
Rip the damn band-aid off. Deal with the screams by asking anyone with
a beef to contribute to the CWiki. Not quite sure the mechanism here
though. Maybe Cassandra and Hoss have some thoughts here?
The point is that I want to
On 4/6/2014 4:12 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> While I somewhat agree with both the points of Furkan and Alexandre, I
> am not sure which way you are leaning: Should we pull off the band-aid
> or not? And do no other committers have an opinion here?
One of the strengths (and weaknesses!) of the o
While I somewhat agree with both the points of Furkan and Alexandre, I am not
sure which way you are leaning: Should we pull off the band-aid or not? And
do no other committers have an opinion here?
-Grant
On Apr 5, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> | I think an interesting side-effe
| I think an interesting side-effect issue here is user perception. I
| feel that ElasticSearch (yet, them) get a lot of points not only
| because of features (not discussing that here) but because they
| actually have taken time to put a polish on the SEO, onboarding and
| other human perception a
+1 on consolidating to the Reference Guide and figuring out the way to
make wiki a lot less visible. But for a completely different set of
reasons than discussed already.
[[rant-start]]
I think an interesting side-effect issue here is user perception. I
feel that ElasticSearch (yet, them) get a l
I’m not too worried about locking anything down, but the current situation is
quite confusing. It can be hard to tell what docs you should be looking at for
a new user.
I’ve started putting big warnings and links on a couple important pages for the
old Wiki, but we should really a do a lot more
On Apr 3, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> Lock down the Solr Wiki
> [...]
>> the Wiki should simply be tips, tricks, etc. and is NOT official
>> documentation and committers, for the most part, don't worry about curating
>> con
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Lock down the Solr Wiki
[...]
> the Wiki should simply be tips, tricks, etc. and is NOT official
> documentation and committers, for the most part, don't worry about curating
> content there.
These two things seem incompatible. If wiki p
Hi,
Main question: Should we
[] Lock down the Solr Wiki sooner rather than later and put all focus on adding
to and improving the Ref Guide
[] Leave the wiki open for anyone to edit now and selectively go through and
try to reconcile it (and delete as we move) and encourage people to go to the
17 matches
Mail list logo
