Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/919/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC
2 tests failed.
FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.HdfsDirectoryFactoryTest
Error Message:
Suite timeout exceeded (>= 720 msec).
Stack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15597068#comment-15597068
]
Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-2216:
Currently, I do not think this is a problem of Solr. Because the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596885#comment-15596885
]
Lance Norskog commented on LUCENE-2899:
---
I don't remember if it's always or just seldom. It was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596782#comment-15596782
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9610:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596777#comment-15596777
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-9371:
---
Perhaps you can use the new AssertTool from the windows script?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-9662.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> New parameter -u in bin/post
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596735#comment-15596735
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9662:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596732#comment-15596732
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9662:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-9670:
--
Attachment: SOLR-9670.patch
Patch
> Support SOLR_AUTHENTICATION_OPTS in solr.cmd
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596662#comment-15596662
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-7850:
---
Minor edit to refGuide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596639#comment-15596639
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-9325:
---
Documented in RefGuide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596617#comment-15596617
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9325:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-9325:
--
Attachment: SOLR-9325-installscript.patch
The {{bin/install_solr_service.sh}} script does a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596545#comment-15596545
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-9533:
--
I've been looking for a SolrCloud hook for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-9255:
--
Summary: Rename SOLR_AUTHENTICATION_CLIENT_CONFIGURER ->
SOLR_AUTHENTICATION_CLIENT_BUILDER (was: Start
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl reassigned SOLR-9670:
-
Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Support SOLR_AUTHENTICATION_OPTS in solr.cmd
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596341#comment-15596341
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-9533:
--
Ok, thanks!
> Reload core config when a core is reloaded
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-9533:
-
Attachment: SOLR-9533.patch
Added a simple test case
> Reload core config when a core is reloaded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596281#comment-15596281
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-7506:
---
Tested on windows 10. Planning to commit during weekend.
> Roll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596148#comment-15596148
]
Pushkar Raste commented on SOLR-9506:
-
Don't use patch for parallalized computation. Parallel streams
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15596010#comment-15596010
]
Awais Malik commented on SOLR-9678:
---
Please guide me. Thanks.
> Group sorting by numFound
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595950#comment-15595950
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-9678:
--
Patches are always welcome. By their nature, Open Source
Awais Malik created SOLR-9678:
-
Summary: Group sorting by numFound
Key: SOLR-9678
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9678
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley resolved SOLR-9676.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 6.3
Sure; thanks Mike.
BTW, please change your name in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595846#comment-15595846
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9676:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595843#comment-15595843
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9676:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pushkar Raste updated SOLR-9546:
Attachment: SOLR-9546_CloudMLTQParser.patch
Patch for CloudMLTQParser
> There is a lot of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595753#comment-15595753
]
Hrishikesh Gadre commented on SOLR-9598:
Clarification - This happens only for a *large* Solr
Is my memory failing? At one point I thought we had a fix for the fact
that the bin/solr script waits 5 seconds and kills Solr, leading to
bogus recoveries. But the latest bin/solr script (6x and trunk) still
have a hard-coded 5 second wait time
Anyone remember what's up with that?
Erick
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595712#comment-15595712
]
Michael Sun commented on SOLR-9598:
---
It seems Solr sometimes doesn't reopen the searcher once collection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595671#comment-15595671
]
Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8785:
---
For the record, it looks like I wrote this patch against master,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595531#comment-15595531
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-8785:
Perhaps it's not the right way, but currently it's the only way I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595421#comment-15595421
]
Shawn Heisey edited comment on SOLR-8785 at 10/21/16 3:59 PM:
--
bq.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595420#comment-15595420
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7498:
+1
> More Like This to Use BM25
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595368#comment-15595368
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7508:
Seems like there are two issues here.
First,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595364#comment-15595364
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7509:
Hi [~peina], could you please turn your test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-4449:
--
Labels: patch patch-available (was: patch-available)
> Enable backup requests for the internal solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-8785:
--
Labels: patch patch-available (was: patch-available)
> Use Metrics library for core metrics
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595349#comment-15595349
]
Phil Hoy commented on SOLR-4449:
I no longer work at Findmypast. Thank you.
> Enable backup requests for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-4449:
--
Labels: patch-available (was: )
> Enable backup requests for the internal solr load balancer
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Wartes updated SOLR-8785:
--
Labels: patch-available (was: )
> Use Metrics library for core metrics
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595329#comment-15595329
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7512:
I haven't looked closely at the warnings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595259#comment-15595259
]
Mike Drob commented on SOLR-6744:
-
[~gesias] - Yes, I think it's the same issue. There were two parts to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-9677:
-
Affects Version/s: 6.2.1
> edismax treat operator as a keyword when a query parameter 'qf'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595235#comment-15595235
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-9677:
--
Just confirmed on trunk and 6x...
> edismax treat operator as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595211#comment-15595211
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7517:
bq. Seems like it should switch to doubles (that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595203#comment-15595203
]
Steve Rowe commented on LUCENE-2899:
IIRC a period is added to sentences that don't already have one.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Rowe updated LUCENE-2899:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: I am currently on Annual Leave, returning on the 24th of October.
If your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595168#comment-15595168
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7517:
--
bq. Any opinions about whether things like CachingCollector
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595163#comment-15595163
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9546:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595162#comment-15595162
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9546:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-9326.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: master (7.0)
6.3
Committed. Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595145#comment-15595145
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7462:
+1 to the semantics and the patch. Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595138#comment-15595138
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9326:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595127#comment-15595127
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9546:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595113#comment-15595113
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7407:
--
bq. > A quick test by hand is still more informative than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-9677:
-
Affects Version/s: trunk
> edismax treat operator as a keyword when a query parameter 'qf'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley reassigned SOLR-9676:
--
Assignee: David Smiley
> FastVectorHighligher log message could be improved
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595075#comment-15595075
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9546:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595064#comment-15595064
]
Joel Bernstein commented on LUCENE-7407:
I think this is progressing in a good way. The initial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595063#comment-15595063
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7516:
--
Presumably this is filed against Lucene and not Solr because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595047#comment-15595047
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-7517:
---
I agree here, especially with Robert's comment: We should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15595043#comment-15595043
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7407:
--
I wouldn't _dare_ suggest to another committer how they
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7517.
Le ven. 21 oct. 2016 à 14:52, Robert Muir a écrit :
> The problem is more than worth it. The alternative is to remove the
> optimization? I don't think being incorrect / adding leniency to tests
> is a valid option at
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-7517:
Summary: Explore making Scorer.score() return a double
Key: LUCENE-7517
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7517
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-7506:
--
Attachment: SOLR-7506.patch
New patch
* Adds GC log rotation with file name {{solr_gc.log}}
* Merge with
The problem is more than worth it. The alternative is to remove the
optimization? I don't think being incorrect / adding leniency to tests
is a valid option at all. In general, if we dont apply a general fix,
it will just make more such optimizations harder: more jenkins
failures, more deltas in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Khludnev updated SOLR-9671:
---
Attachment:
TestMiniSolrCloudCluster-testCollectionCreateSearchDelete-fail-brief.txt
and this behavior of not failing update.process() with bad credentials only
seen within the test / for the test cluster created within the
BasicAuthIntegrationTest. If I point it to external cluster, the same code
i.e. update.process() fails for bad credentials. Something is weird /
missing in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594967#comment-15594967
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7407:
bq. At first blush, it doesn't look like the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-9570.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Logs backed up on restart are kept forever
>
I suspect we could do something on the Scorer API indeed, eg. by giving
scorers a way to expose the double value of the score. However it's not
clear to me that this problem is worth making the Scorer API more complex?
Le ven. 21 oct. 2016 à 12:37, Robert Muir a écrit :
> But
Mikhail Khludnev created LUCENE-7516:
Summary: consider to remove DocSet.close()
Key: LUCENE-7516
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7516
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594934#comment-15594934
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-7512:
---
+1, this looks great.
Some of the suppression is fine,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Khludnev updated SOLR-9671:
---
Attachment:
TestMiniSolrCloudCluster-testCollectionCreateSearchDelete-fail.zip
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Khludnev updated SOLR-9671:
---
Attachment: (was: TestMiniSolrCloudCluster-epic-fail.zip)
> TestMiniSolrCloudCluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594893#comment-15594893
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-9399:
---
Did some more testing and managed to have the CloudSolrClient
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594849#comment-15594849
]
Alex Watson commented on LUCENE-2899:
-
I am currently on Annual Leave, returning on the 24th of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594847#comment-15594847
]
Joern Kottmann commented on LUCENE-2899:
The patch has this comment:
"EN POS tagger sometimes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexandre Rafalovitch closed SOLR-490.
--
Resolution: Workaround
A new issue can be opened against the latest implementation of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Khludnev updated LUCENE-7512:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-7512-solr-core-src.patch
and now [^LUCENE-7512-solr-core-src.patch]
But maybe the old "trick" can still be used somehow: just means using
double precision internally to erase most differences? Maybe it means
a change to scorer api or whatever, but still I think its a good
practical solution (vs something more extreme like kahan summation). I
am sure it does not
Le ven. 21 oct. 2016 à 12:20, Robert Muir a écrit :
> What changed?
>
The issue here is ReqOptSumScorer, which computes the score of the MUST and
SHOULD clauses separately and then sum them up. In that test case, in one
case body:d is in the list of SHOULD clauses, and in the
We had similar tests before though, with BS1 vs BS2. Because BS1
scored out-of-order, it performed additions in different order, too.
But we did the math in these boolean scorers with double precision
internally and this kept the test happy (I am sure, if you had a
massive massive BQ it would
I don't think this test failure proves that the optimization is broken. The
other failure is a bit easier to understand so I'll use it as an example,
but this one is the same. We have an initial query which is #body:d
(+body:b (body:d body:a))^4.0 +body:c body:d)^4.0)^8.0)^3.0)^9.0 and we are
Personally I think that is not correct to do. Some optimization or
another is broken if scores differ in this way...
Just because differences are "small" does not make them insignificant.
Think about the tie-break case to users and so on, especially with
smaller documents / less terms / etc.
Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/18104/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_102 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 12646 lines...]
[junit4] JVM J0: stdout was not empty, see:
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-7515:
---
Summary: RunListenerPrintReproduceInfo may try to access
uninitialized rule fields resulting in an NPE
Key: LUCENE-7515
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7515
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594600#comment-15594600
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7515:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-7515.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> RunListenerPrintReproduceInfo may try to access uninitialized rule fields
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594601#comment-15594601
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7515:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594591#comment-15594591
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7513:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594590#comment-15594590
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7513:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-7513.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Update to randomizedtesting 2.4.0
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594543#comment-15594543
]
adeppa commented on SOLR-8542:
--
Hi Team,
Could you help any one how to integrate LTR in to solr 5.1.0 ,if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594525#comment-15594525
]
Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-2212:
Now, mergePolicy accept a MergePolicyFactory. So I think we can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594525#comment-15594525
]
Cao Manh Dat edited comment on SOLR-2212 at 10/21/16 8:55 AM:
--
Now,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594495#comment-15594495
]
Mikhail Khludnev edited comment on SOLR-9671 at 10/21/16 8:44 AM:
--
thread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15594495#comment-15594495
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-9671:
thread dump is full of hanging remote /get requests
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-7514:
---
Summary: TestLatLonPointQueries fails with biased (evil) numbers
Key: LUCENE-7514
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7514
Project: Lucene - Core
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo