[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 120 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/120/
Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -client -XX:+UseG1GC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff

Error Message:
expected: but was:

Stack Trace:
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but 
was:
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([245F67F2A8F6176E:E149A369B8402F0E]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:125)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:147)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff(MBeansHandlerTest.java:63)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:543)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:367)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:811)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:462)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:367)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)




Build Log:
[...truncated 12085 lines...]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest
   [junit4]   2> Creating dataDir: 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/solr/build/solr-core/test/J2/temp/solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest_245F67F2A8F6176E-001/init-core-data-001
   [junit4]   2> 1379379 INFO  

Solr -Issue

[Neeraj Kumar]

Could you please tell me how to use spanNot query in solr.

exmaple: spanNot(spanNear((b,c),30,false),spanNear(a,d))


Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
TCS Deutschland GmbH
i.V. Neeraj Kumar

TCS Deutschland GmbH
Contractpartner of Bayer Business Services GmbH
BBS-ITS-R/BCS

On behalf of
Bayer Business Services GmbH
51368 Leverkusen, Deutschland

Tel: +91-120-6163122
E-Mail: neeraj.kumar@bayer.com
Web: 
http://www.business-services.bayer.com

Geschäftsführung: Daniel Hartert, Vorsitzender   |   Wilhelm Oehlschläger, 
Arbeitsdirektor
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Johannes Dietsch
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Leverkusen   |   Amtsgericht Köln, HRB 49895

Solr Search - Issue

[Neeraj Kumar]

Hi Team,

I am new to solr and need your help. My problem statement is as below

I have uploaded document in solr as below. #sb# represents sentence begining 
and #se# represents senetence ending. Now I want to search terms which occur in 
same sentence .  If I search for q=text:"Federer Wimbledon" ,  below document 
should come in search result as both the terms occur in same senetence. If I 
search for q=text:"Federer Rafa" ,below document should not come in search 
result as the terms occur in different sentences.

#sb#Federer, who looked ahead at Sunday's final, calling it an 'epic battle', 
said, "Maybe I lost the Wimbledon final in 2008 because of too many clay court 
matches #se##sb# He crushed me at the French Open final #se##sb# I think it 
affected my first two sets at Wimbledon #se##sb# Maybe that's why I ended up 
losing#se##sb# The Swiss continued, "I know Rafa played great in that final 
#se##sb# I actually ended up playing great too, but I wasn't fighting the right 
way #se##sb# I think that was the effect of that French Open loss. It was more 
mental #se#
Could you please tell me how to fire query to achieve this.


Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
TCS Deutschland GmbH
i.V. Neeraj Kumar

TCS Deutschland GmbH
Contractpartner of Bayer Business Services GmbH
BBS-ITS-R/BCS

On behalf of
Bayer Business Services GmbH
51368 Leverkusen, Deutschland

Tel: +91-120-6163122
E-Mail: neeraj.kumar@bayer.com
Web: 
http://www.business-services.bayer.com

Geschäftsführung: Daniel Hartert, Vorsitzender   |   Wilhelm Oehlschläger, 
Arbeitsdirektor
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Johannes Dietsch
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Leverkusen   |   Amtsgericht Köln, HRB 49895

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.5 - Build # 11 - Still Failing

[Apache Jenkins Server]

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.5/11/

2 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test

Error Message:
expected:<152> but was:<147>

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<152> but was:<147>
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([CE7667AB6AEE6A33:46225871C41207CB]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:456)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.bringUpDeadNodeAndEnsureNoReplication(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:278)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.forceNodeFailureAndDoPeerSync(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:242)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:125)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1764)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:871)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:921)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:996)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:971)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:367)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:809)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:460)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:781)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:816)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:827)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux (32bit/jdk1.7.0_80) - Build # 434 - Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux/434/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_80 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

2 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.DistribDocExpirationUpdateProcessorTest.test

Error Message:
Exactly one shard should have changed, instead: [shard2, shard1] 
nodes=([core_node2(shard1), core_node4(shard1), core_node3(shard2)]) 
expected:<1> but was:<2>

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Exactly one shard should have changed, instead: 
[shard2, shard1] nodes=([core_node2(shard1), core_node4(shard1), 
core_node3(shard2)]) expected:<1> but was:<2>
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([58FE2110E3C87955:D0AA1ECA4D3414AD]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.DistribDocExpirationUpdateProcessorTest.test(DistribDocExpirationUpdateProcessorTest.java:119)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1764)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:871)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:921)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:996)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:971)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:367)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:809)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:460)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:781)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:816)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:827)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x - Build # 708 - Unstable

[Apache Jenkins Server]

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x/708/

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff

Error Message:
expected: but was:

Stack Trace:
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but 
was:
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([E86AE25ECDBA3A35:2D7C26C5DD0C0255]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:125)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:147)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff(MBeansHandlerTest.java:63)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)




Build Log:
[...truncated 11307 lines...]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest
   [junit4]   2> Creating dataDir: 
/x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x/solr/build/solr-core/test/J0/temp/solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest_E86AE25ECDBA3A35-001/init-core-data-001
   [junit4]   2> 460921 INFO  

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1117 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1117/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test

Error Message:
timeout waiting to see all nodes active

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: timeout waiting to see all nodes active
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([D6E3A14A784FE050:5EB79E90D6B38DA8]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.waitTillNodesActive(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:326)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.bringUpDeadNodeAndEnsureNoReplication(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:277)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.forceNodeFailureAndDoPeerSync(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:259)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:138)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:985)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:960)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7677) Cache compound filters earlier than regular queries

[David Smiley (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855297#comment-15855297
 ] 

David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7677:
--

+1 nice, especially the embedded comments

> Cache compound filters earlier than regular queries
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-7677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7677
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Adrien Grand
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-7677.patch
>
>
> Say you keep reusing a boolean filter that looks like "A OR B" and never use 
> the A and B queries out of that boolean query. Currently, after this filter 
> has been used 5 times, we would cache both A, B and "A OR B", which means 
> that cache entries for A and B would only be built for the purpose of 
> building a cache entry for "A OR B", which is wasteful.
> By caching compound queries a bit earlier, we could make it less likely to 
> happen since:
>  - we only consider queries as consumed if a scorer is pulled
>  - once the boolean query is cached, we stop pulling scorers on the A and B 
> queries



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10063) CoreContainer shutdown has race condition that can cause a hang on shutdown.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Miller updated SOLR-10063:
---
Priority: Critical  (was: Major)
 Summary: CoreContainer shutdown has race condition that can cause a hang 
on shutdown.  (was: TestShardHandlerFactory appears to hang when I attempt to 
beast it.)

> CoreContainer shutdown has race condition that can cause a hang on shutdown.
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10063
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>Assignee: Mark Miller
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: im-patch-1.png
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10101) TestLazyCores hangs.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Miller updated SOLR-10101:
---
Priority: Critical  (was: Major)

> TestLazyCores hangs.
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: stacks.txt
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10068) The Nightly test SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverTest appears to be too fragile.

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855276#comment-15855276
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10068:


Commit 8bb61cc60f74052a27aba41eb16dc4fd44162e01 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from markrmiller
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=8bb61cc ]

SOLR-10068: Boost wait time.


> The Nightly test SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverTest appears to be too fragile.
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-10068
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10068
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>Assignee: Mark Miller
>
> SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverTest 37.00% screwy 30.00 273.97 @Nightly



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10101) TestLazyCores hangs.

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855277#comment-15855277
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10101:


Commit fd72c854d7a644a1851d5baa421d3750a7911b82 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from markrmiller
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=fd72c85 ]

SOLR-10101: BadApple test method.


> TestLazyCores hangs.
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
> Attachments: stacks.txt
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 18917 - Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/18917/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardSplitTest.testSplitAfterFailedSplit

Error Message:
expected:<1> but was:<2>

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<2>
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([DB4D94BB5EDC805F:2200071462A9CDD5]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:456)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardSplitTest.testSplitAfterFailedSplit(ShardSplitTest.java:283)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:543)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:985)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:960)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 682 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX/682/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

8 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.CustomCollectionTest.testRouteFieldForHashRouter

Error Message:
Collection not found: routeFieldColl

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Collection not found: routeFieldColl
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([B6ACBFE4FDEFB4EB:1E9A2139628E5FB1]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.getCollectionNames(CloudSolrClient.java:1376)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(CloudSolrClient.java:1072)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.request(CloudSolrClient.java:1042)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:160)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.UpdateRequest.commit(UpdateRequest.java:232)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.CustomCollectionTest.testRouteFieldForHashRouter(CustomCollectionTest.java:166)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for 6.4 (RC1)

[Steve Rowe]

+1

--
Steve
www.lucidowrks.com

> On Feb 6, 2017, at 12:24 PM, David Smiley  wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:59 PM Cassandra Targett  wrote:
> Please vote for the release of the Apache Solr Reference Guide for 6.4.
> 
> Artifacts are available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4-RC1
> 
> $ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4-RC1/apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4.pdf.sha1
> 4396f8f7a26e55cb920b3b6ac82627ca96814014  apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4.pdf
> 
> Here's my +1.
> 
> Thanks,
> Cassandra
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
> -- 
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: 
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 119 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/119/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff

Error Message:
expected: but was:

Stack Trace:
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but 
was:
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([DF7F347AD6CBEB83:1A69F0E1C67DD3E3]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:125)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:147)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff(MBeansHandlerTest.java:63)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:367)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:811)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:462)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:367)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)




Build Log:
[...truncated 11341 lines...]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest
   [junit4]   2> Creating dataDir: 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/solr/build/solr-core/test/J0/temp/solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest_DF7F347AD6CBEB83-001/init-core-data-001
   [junit4]   2> 

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7673) Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues

[JIRA]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855109#comment-15855109
 ] 

Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on LUCENE-7673:
---

bq. It'd be nice if {{DoubleValueSource}} and {{LongValueSource}}...
Created LUCENE-7678

> Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7673
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Fix For: master (7.0), 6.5
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7673.patch
>
>
> Right now \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource can give a {{ValueSource}} 
> view of a {{NumericDocValues}} field. This Jira is to add 
> MultiValued\[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource that given a 
> {{SortedNumericSelector.Type}} can give a {{ValueSource}} view of a 
> {{SortedNumericDocValues}} field
> I considered instead of adding new classes an optional selector parameter to 
> the existing \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource, but I think adding 
> different classes makes a cleaner API and it’s clear that for MultiValued* 
> case, the selector is a mandatory parameter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7678) Get DoubleValueSource and LongValueSource views of fields with SortedNumericDocValues

[JIRA]

Tomás Fernández Löbbe created LUCENE-7678:
-

 Summary: Get DoubleValueSource and LongValueSource views of fields 
with SortedNumericDocValues
 Key: LUCENE-7678
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7678
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe


As discussed in LUCENE-7673, we should have a way to get {{DoubleValueSource}} 
and {{LongValueSource}} views of multi-valued fields indexed with 
{{SortedNumericDocValues}} by using a {{SortedNumericSelector.Type}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7673) Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues

[JIRA]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tomás Fernández Löbbe resolved LUCENE-7673.
---
Resolution: Fixed

> Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7673
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Fix For: master (7.0), 6.5
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7673.patch
>
>
> Right now \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource can give a {{ValueSource}} 
> view of a {{NumericDocValues}} field. This Jira is to add 
> MultiValued\[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource that given a 
> {{SortedNumericSelector.Type}} can give a {{ValueSource}} view of a 
> {{SortedNumericDocValues}} field
> I considered instead of adding new classes an optional selector parameter to 
> the existing \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource, but I think adding 
> different classes makes a cleaner API and it’s clear that for MultiValued* 
> case, the selector is a mandatory parameter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7673) Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues

[JIRA]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tomás Fernández Löbbe updated LUCENE-7673:
--
Fix Version/s: 6.5
   master (7.0)

> Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7673
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Fix For: master (7.0), 6.5
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7673.patch
>
>
> Right now \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource can give a {{ValueSource}} 
> view of a {{NumericDocValues}} field. This Jira is to add 
> MultiValued\[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource that given a 
> {{SortedNumericSelector.Type}} can give a {{ValueSource}} view of a 
> {{SortedNumericDocValues}} field
> I considered instead of adding new classes an optional selector parameter to 
> the existing \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource, but I think adding 
> different classes makes a cleaner API and it’s clear that for MultiValued* 
> case, the selector is a mandatory parameter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 3817 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/3817/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test

Error Message:
timeout waiting to see all nodes active

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: timeout waiting to see all nodes active
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([BB43F3AEC31A5791:3317CC746DE63A69]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.waitTillNodesActive(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:326)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.bringUpDeadNodeAndEnsureNoReplication(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:277)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.forceNodeFailureAndDoPeerSync(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:259)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test(PeerSyncReplicationTest.java:138)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:985)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:960)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (LUCENE-7410) Make cache keys and closed listeners less trappy

[Yonik Seeley (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-7410:
-
Comment: was deleted

(was: Seems like CacheHelper is missing from the patch?
)

> Make cache keys and closed listeners less trappy
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7410
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Attachments: LUCENE-7410.patch, LUCENE-7410.patch, LUCENE-7410.patch
>
>
> IndexReader currently exposes getCoreCacheKey(), 
> getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey(), addCoreClosedListener() and 
> addReaderClosedListener(). They are typically used to manage resources whose 
> lifetime needs to mimic the lifetime of segments/indexes, typically caches.
> I think this is trappy for various reasons:
> h3. Memory leaks
> When maintaining a cache, entries are added to the cache based on the cache 
> key and then evicted using the cache key that is given back by the close 
> listener, so it is very important that both keys are the same.
> But if a filter reader happens to delegate get*Key() and not 
> add*ClosedListener() or vice-versa then there is potential for a memory leak 
> since the closed listener will be called on a different key and entries will 
> never be evicted from the cache.
> h3. Lifetime expectations
> The expectation of using the core cache key is that it will not change in 
> case of deletions, but this is only true on SegmentReader and LeafReader 
> impls that delegate to it. Other implementations such as composite readers or 
> parallel leaf readers use the same key for "core" and "combined core and 
> deletes".
> h3. Throw-away wrappers cause cache trashing
> An application might want to either expose more (with a ParrallelReader or 
> MultiReader) or less information (by filtering fields/docs that can be seen) 
> depending on the user who is logged in. In that case the application would 
> typically maintain a DirectoryReader and then wrap it per request depending 
> on the logged user and throw away the wrapper once the request is completed.
> The problem is that these wrappers have their own cache keys and the 
> application may build something costly and put it in a cache to throw it away 
> a couple milliseconds later. I would rather like for such readers to have a 
> way to opt out from caching on order to avoid this performance trap.
> h3. Type safety
> The keys that are exposed are plain java.lang.Object instances, which 
> requires caches to look like a {{Map}} which makes it very easy to 
> either try to get, put or remove on the wrong object since any object would 
> be accepted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7410) Make cache keys and closed listeners less trappy

[Yonik Seeley (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855038#comment-15855038
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7410:
--

Seems like CacheHelper is missing from the patch?


> Make cache keys and closed listeners less trappy
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7410
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Attachments: LUCENE-7410.patch, LUCENE-7410.patch, LUCENE-7410.patch
>
>
> IndexReader currently exposes getCoreCacheKey(), 
> getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey(), addCoreClosedListener() and 
> addReaderClosedListener(). They are typically used to manage resources whose 
> lifetime needs to mimic the lifetime of segments/indexes, typically caches.
> I think this is trappy for various reasons:
> h3. Memory leaks
> When maintaining a cache, entries are added to the cache based on the cache 
> key and then evicted using the cache key that is given back by the close 
> listener, so it is very important that both keys are the same.
> But if a filter reader happens to delegate get*Key() and not 
> add*ClosedListener() or vice-versa then there is potential for a memory leak 
> since the closed listener will be called on a different key and entries will 
> never be evicted from the cache.
> h3. Lifetime expectations
> The expectation of using the core cache key is that it will not change in 
> case of deletions, but this is only true on SegmentReader and LeafReader 
> impls that delegate to it. Other implementations such as composite readers or 
> parallel leaf readers use the same key for "core" and "combined core and 
> deletes".
> h3. Throw-away wrappers cause cache trashing
> An application might want to either expose more (with a ParrallelReader or 
> MultiReader) or less information (by filtering fields/docs that can be seen) 
> depending on the user who is logged in. In that case the application would 
> typically maintain a DirectoryReader and then wrap it per request depending 
> on the logged user and throw away the wrapper once the request is completed.
> The problem is that these wrappers have their own cache keys and the 
> application may build something costly and put it in a cache to throw it away 
> a couple milliseconds later. I would rather like for such readers to have a 
> way to opt out from caching on order to avoid this performance trap.
> h3. Type safety
> The keys that are exposed are plain java.lang.Object instances, which 
> requires caches to look like a {{Map}} which makes it very easy to 
> either try to get, put or remove on the wrong object since any object would 
> be accepted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 6.4.1 (rc1)

[Jeff Breidenbach]

+1

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Andi Vajda  wrote:

>
> The PyLucene 6.4.1 (rc1) release tracking today's release of
> Apache Lucene 6.4.1 is ready.
>
> A release candidate is available from:
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/6.4.1-rc1/
>
> PyLucene 6.4.1 is built with JCC 2.23 included in these release artifacts.
>
> Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 6.4.1.
> Anyone interested in this release can and should vote !
>
> Thanks !
>
> Andi..
>
> ps: the KEYS file for PyLucene release signing is at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/lucene/pylucene/KEYS
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/KEYS
>
> pps: here is my +1
>

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 433 - Failure!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux/433/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 51319 lines...]
  [javadoc] Generating Javadoc
  [javadoc] Javadoc execution
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.analysis...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.codecs...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.blocktree...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.compressing...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene54...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.perfield...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.document...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.index...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.search...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.search.similarities...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.search.spans...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.store...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util.automaton...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util.fst...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util.mutable...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util.packed...
  [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information...
  [javadoc] 1 error

[...truncated 2 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux/build.xml:750: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux/build.xml:101: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux/lucene/build.xml:138: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux/lucene/common-build.xml:792: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux/lucene/core/build.xml:52: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-5.5-Linux/lucene/common-build.xml:2134: 
Javadoc returned 1

Total time: 64 minutes 49 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
[WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.5-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 129 - Failure!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.5-Windows/129/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 51342 lines...]
  [javadoc] Generating Javadoc
  [javadoc] Javadoc execution
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.analysis...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.codecs...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.blocktree...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.compressing...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene54...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.codecs.perfield...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.document...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.index...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.search...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package 
org.apache.lucene.search.similarities...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.search.spans...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.store...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util.automaton...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util.fst...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util.mutable...
  [javadoc] Loading source files for package org.apache.lucene.util.packed...
  [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information...
  [javadoc] 1 error

[...truncated 2 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.5-Windows\build.xml:750: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.5-Windows\build.xml:101: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.5-Windows\lucene\build.xml:138: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.5-Windows\lucene\common-build.xml:792: 
The following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.5-Windows\lucene\core\build.xml:52: 
The following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\jenkins\workspace\Lucene-Solr-5.5-Windows\lucene\common-build.xml:2134:
 Javadoc returned 1

Total time: 88 minutes 3 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
[WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.x - Build # 275 - Still Unstable

[Apache Jenkins Server]

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.x/275/

6 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.test

Error Message:
Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=56167, name=Thread-50578, 
state=RUNNABLE, group=TGRP-TestDistributedSearch]

Stack Trace:
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.UncaughtExceptionError: Captured an uncaught 
exception in thread: Thread[id=56167, name=Thread-50578, state=RUNNABLE, 
group=TGRP-TestDistributedSearch]
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: Expected to find shardAddress in the up 
shard info
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([133465527413FA1F]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at 
org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.comparePartialResponses(TestDistributedSearch.java:1174)
at 
org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch$1.run(TestDistributedSearch.java:1130)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.TestLeaderElectionWithEmptyReplica.test

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([133465527413FA1F:9B605A88DAEF97E7]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.common.cloud.ZkStateReader.waitForState(ZkStateReader.java:1251)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrClient.waitForState(CloudSolrClient.java:702)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestLeaderElectionWithEmptyReplica.test(TestLeaderElectionWithEmptyReplica.java:97)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10101) TestLazyCores hangs.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Miller updated SOLR-10101:
---
Attachment: stacks.txt

> TestLazyCores hangs.
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
> Attachments: stacks.txt
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10101) TestLazyCores hangs.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Miller updated SOLR-10101:
---
Issue Type: Bug  (was: Test)

> TestLazyCores hangs.
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
> Attachments: stacks.txt
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10101) TestLazyCores hangs.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854816#comment-15854816
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10101:


Looks like it happens in testNoCommit every case I checked.

TEST-TestLazyCores.testNoCommit-seed#[D303C68EE83719FC] [WAITING]
java.lang.Object.wait(long) Object.java (native)
org.apache.solr.core.SolrCores.waitAddPendingCoreOps(String) SolrCores.java:356
org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.getCore(String) CoreContainer.java:1286
org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores.testNoCommit() TestLazyCores.java:772

> TestLazyCores hangs.
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10101) TestLazyCores hangs.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Miller updated SOLR-10101:
---
Summary: TestLazyCores hangs.  (was: TestShardHandlerFactory hangs.)

> TestLazyCores hangs.
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10063) TestShardHandlerFactory appears to hang when I attempt to beast it.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854813#comment-15854813
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10063:


bq. ant beast -Dbeast.iters=100 -Dtestcase=TestShardHandlerFactory

I think I remember you figured out the parallel argument in another thread.

With my beast script, I would see this about one in 60 runs doing 10 in 
parallel for 30 total iterations.

The above prevents the hang so far in my test beasting, but it's not really 
foolproof either.

> TestShardHandlerFactory appears to hang when I attempt to beast it.
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-10063
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>Assignee: Mark Miller
> Attachments: im-patch-1.png
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10063) TestShardHandlerFactory appears to hang when I attempt to beast it.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Miller updated SOLR-10063:
---
Issue Type: Bug  (was: Test)

> TestShardHandlerFactory appears to hang when I attempt to beast it.
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-10063
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>Assignee: Mark Miller
> Attachments: im-patch-1.png
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10101) TestShardHandlerFactory hangs.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

Mark Miller created SOLR-10101:
--

 Summary: TestShardHandlerFactory hangs.
 Key: SOLR-10101
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10101
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Test
  Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
Reporter: Mark Miller






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10063) TestShardHandlerFactory appears to hang when I attempt to beast it.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854806#comment-15854806
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10063:


This is due to a race on shutdown. On shutdown the code breaks waits with an 
interruptAll and then assumes things are all good, but something can go into 
wait right after the interruptAll. A workaround is:

!im-patch-1.png!

> TestShardHandlerFactory appears to hang when I attempt to beast it.
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-10063
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>Assignee: Mark Miller
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10063) TestShardHandlerFactory appears to hang when I attempt to beast it.

[Mark Miller (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Miller updated SOLR-10063:
---
Attachment: im-patch-1.png

> TestShardHandlerFactory appears to hang when I attempt to beast it.
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-10063
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10063
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>Assignee: Mark Miller
> Attachments: im-patch-1.png
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7664) Deprecate GeoPointField & queries

[Michael McCandless (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-7664.

Resolution: Fixed

> Deprecate GeoPointField & queries
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-7664
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7664
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Michael McCandless
>Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: master (7.0), 6.5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7664.patch
>
>
> The new dimensional points implementations for geo distance, polygon, shape 
> filtering are substantially faster and creates a smaller index than the 
> postings based {{GeoPointField}}.  They also offer nearest neighbor search, 
> which {{GeoPointField}} doesn't.
> I think we should deprecate {{GeoPointField}} and focus on the points 
> implementations.
> We have still other legacy postings based geo implementations but I think we 
> should keep them for now since they have functionality that points doesn't 
> yet have: the ability to index a shape and search for shapes overlapping the 
> indexed shapes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[VOTE] Release PyLucene 6.4.1 (rc1)

[Andi Vajda]

The PyLucene 6.4.1 (rc1) release tracking today's release of
Apache Lucene 6.4.1 is ready.

A release candidate is available from:
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/6.4.1-rc1/

PyLucene 6.4.1 is built with JCC 2.23 included in these release artifacts.

Please vote to release these artifacts as PyLucene 6.4.1.
Anyone interested in this release can and should vote !

Thanks !

Andi..

ps: the KEYS file for PyLucene release signing is at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/lucene/pylucene/KEYS
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/KEYS

pps: here is my +1

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10011) Refactor PointField & TrieField to share common code

[Ishan Chattopadhyaya (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854793#comment-15854793
 ] 

Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-10011:
-

+1, LGTM! Sorry for the delay in reviewing; I missed your comment completely.

> Refactor PointField & TrieField to share common code
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10011
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10011
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>Assignee: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Attachments: SOLR-10011.patch, SOLR-10011.patch, SOLR-10011.patch, 
> SOLR-10011.patch, SOLR-10011.patch
>
>
> We should eliminate PointTypes and TrieTypes enum to have a common enum for 
> both. That would enable us to share a lot of code between the two field types.
> In the process, fix the bug:
> PointFields with indexed=false, docValues=true seem to be using 
> (Int|Double|Float|Long)Point.newRangeQuery() for performing exact matches and 
> range queries. However, they should instead be using DocValues based range 
> query.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7664) Deprecate GeoPointField & queries

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854758#comment-15854758
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7664:
-

Commit 3e730f9bd2124ac72fe03c56793477e6c0902c3d in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from Mike McCandless
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=3e730f9b ]

LUCENE-7664: remove GeoPointField and its queries


> Deprecate GeoPointField & queries
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-7664
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7664
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Michael McCandless
>Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: master (7.0), 6.5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7664.patch
>
>
> The new dimensional points implementations for geo distance, polygon, shape 
> filtering are substantially faster and creates a smaller index than the 
> postings based {{GeoPointField}}.  They also offer nearest neighbor search, 
> which {{GeoPointField}} doesn't.
> I think we should deprecate {{GeoPointField}} and focus on the points 
> implementations.
> We have still other legacy postings based geo implementations but I think we 
> should keep them for now since they have functionality that points doesn't 
> yet have: the ability to index a shape and search for shapes overlapping the 
> indexed shapes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7664) Deprecate GeoPointField & queries

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854713#comment-15854713
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7664:
-

Commit d1135b4d29039628cc3097e4cb1b0e09216b1814 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6x from Mike McCandless
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=d1135b4 ]

LUCENE-7664: deprecate GeoPointField and its queries


> Deprecate GeoPointField & queries
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-7664
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7664
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Michael McCandless
>Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: master (7.0), 6.5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7664.patch
>
>
> The new dimensional points implementations for geo distance, polygon, shape 
> filtering are substantially faster and creates a smaller index than the 
> postings based {{GeoPointField}}.  They also offer nearest neighbor search, 
> which {{GeoPointField}} doesn't.
> I think we should deprecate {{GeoPointField}} and focus on the points 
> implementations.
> We have still other legacy postings based geo implementations but I think we 
> should keep them for now since they have functionality that points doesn't 
> yet have: the ability to index a shape and search for shapes overlapping the 
> indexed shapes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9912) SimpleFacets - support facet.excludeTerms parameter

[David Smiley (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854706#comment-15854706
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-9912:


Looking good.  I like the use of {{Predicate.and}}.

Might you make {{ExcludeBytesRefFilter}} an anonymous inner class instead a top 
level public class?  It's really small and it's yet another file / thing to 
name.

> SimpleFacets - support facet.excludeTerms parameter
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-9912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9912
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jonny Marks
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-9912.patch, SOLR-9912.patch, SOLR-9912.patch
>
>
> This ticket is for supporting a new facet.excludeTerms parameter for removing 
> specific terms from the facet counts, without having to exclude the terms 
> from the index itself.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for 6.4 (RC1)

[David Smiley]

+1

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:59 PM Cassandra Targett 
wrote:

> Please vote for the release of the Apache Solr Reference Guide for 6.4.
>
> Artifacts are available from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4-RC1
>
> $ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4-RC1/apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4.pdf.sha1
> 4396f8f7a26e55cb920b3b6ac82627ca96814014  apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4.pdf
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
> Cassandra
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 118 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/118/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.ChaosMonkeyNothingIsSafeTest.test

Error Message:
document count mismatch.  control=1138 sum(shards)=1137 cloudClient=1137

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: document count mismatch.  control=1138 
sum(shards)=1137 cloudClient=1137
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([AE0848DB8D645B37:265C7701239836CF]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase.checkShardConsistency(AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase.java:1323)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.ChaosMonkeyNothingIsSafeTest.test(ChaosMonkeyNothingIsSafeTest.java:228)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:992)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:967)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:367)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:811)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:462)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.5.4

[Jan Høydahl]

Hmm, need to backport the test fix for SOLR-10031 on Windows for 5_5 branch. 
Master commit aa5e048cbf7c6fa9e8331c51b5f3331636dd7951

--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com

> 6. feb. 2017 kl. 14.42 skrev Adrien Grand :
> 
> Thanks Uwe and Steve!
> 
> Le lun. 6 févr. 2017 à 14:12, Steve Rowe  > a écrit :
> I enabled the already existing 5.5 branch jobs on ASF Jenkins.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com 
> 
> > On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Uwe Schindler  > > wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > No problem, I'll help! Will do it when back home from Brussels. It is more 
> > complicated, because it needs Java 7 and smoker should run on both. So we 
> > should reuse disabled old jobs.
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > Am 6. Februar 2017 12:06:41 MEZ schrieb Adrien Grand  > >:
> > Could someone help me enable Jenkins builds on branch_5_5?
> >
> > Le lun. 6 févr. 2017 à 12:02, Adrien Grand  > > a écrit :
> > I started backporting some changes. Please find below the list of changes 
> > we have in 5.5.4 for now. Uwe, do you think we should try to backport 
> > LUCENE-7651 too?
> >
> > * LUCENE-7417: The standard Highlighter could throw an 
> > IllegalArgumentException when
> >   trying to highlight a query containing a degenerate case of a 
> > MultiPhraseQuery with one
> >   term.  (Thomas Kappler via David Smiley)
> >
> > * LUCENE-7657: Fixed potential memory leak in the case that a 
> > (Span)TermQuery
> >   with a TermContext is cached. (Adrien Grand)
> >
> > * LUCENE-7647: Made stored fields reclaim native memory more aggressively 
> > when
> >   configured with BEST_COMPRESSION. This could otherwise result in 
> > out-of-memory
> >   issues. (Adrien Grand)
> >
> > * LUCENE-7562: CompletionFieldsConsumer sometimes throws
> >   NullPointerException on ghost fields (Oliver Eilhard via Mike McCandless)
> >
> > * LUCENE-7543: Make changes-to-html target an offline operation, by moving 
> > the
> >   Lucene and Solr DOAP RDF files into the Git source repository under
> >   dev-tools/doap/ and then pulling release dates from those files, rather 
> > than
> >   from JIRA. (Mano Kovacs, hossman, Steve Rowe)
> >
> > * SOLR-9819: Upgrade commons-fileupload to 1.3.2, fixing a potential 
> > vulnerability CVE-2016-3092 (Anshum Gupta)
> >
> > * SOLR-10031: Validation of filename params in ReplicationHandler 
> > (Hrishikesh Gadre, janhoy)
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 3 févr. 2017 à 12:17, Adrien Grand  > > a écrit :
> > Sure, the list of bugs I gave is not exhaustive. :)
> >
> > By the way I did not say it explicitly but I don't mind being the release 
> > manager for this release.
> >
> > Le ven. 3 févr. 2017 à 12:16, Michael McCandless  > > a écrit :
> > +1
> >
> > I would also like to backport
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7562 
> >  for 5.5.4 (and
> > probably there are other bug fixes).
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com 
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Adrien Grand  > > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to propose releasing Lucene/Solr 5.5.4 in order to address 
> > > both
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647 
> > >  and
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657 
> > >  like for the 6.4.1
> > > release.
> > >
> > > I propose to start building a RC after 6.4.1 is out in order to not have 
> > > to
> > > RCs running at the same time, which means we could hopefully build the 
> > > first
> > > RC early next week.
> > >
> > > Opinions?
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org 
> > 
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org 
> > 
> >
> >
> > --
> > Uwe Schindler
> > Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org 
> 
> 

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 652 - Still unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris/652/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

4 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores.testNoCommit

Error Message:
Exception during query

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception during query
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([68B41D111894FB2A:B7D4BCC0D3B3988F]:0)
at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.assertQ(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:821)
at org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores.check10(TestLazyCores.java:794)
at 
org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores.testNoCommit(TestLazyCores.java:776)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: REQUEST FAILED: 
xpath=//result[@numFound='10']
xml response was: 



  0
  0
  
*:*
  





request was:q=*:*
at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.assertQ(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:814)
... 41 more


FAILED:  

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10100) Hiding credentials from security.json when retrieving through /admin/zookeeper

[JIRA]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854627#comment-15854627
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-10100:


We already have SOLR-7890 covering the protection of security.json both on the 
ZK API level and Admin UI level. There is a patch, but it is not committed. 
Marking this as duplicate

> Hiding credentials from security.json when retrieving through /admin/zookeeper
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10100
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10100
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: security
>Reporter: Mano Kovacs
>
> {{/admin/zookeeper}} API is currently exposing {{security.json}} as-is, which 
> can contain security credentials as well.
> Proposing a configurable list for hiding elements of {{security.json}} when 
> loaded through {{/admin/zookeeper}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7673) Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854587#comment-15854587
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7673:
-

Commit c9c3fb489c822e0f46927167b39911e9ec7ac52a in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6x from Tomas Fernandez Lobbe
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c9c3fb4 ]

LUCENE-7673: Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for 
SortedNumericDocValues


> Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7673
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Attachments: LUCENE-7673.patch
>
>
> Right now \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource can give a {{ValueSource}} 
> view of a {{NumericDocValues}} field. This Jira is to add 
> MultiValued\[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource that given a 
> {{SortedNumericSelector.Type}} can give a {{ValueSource}} view of a 
> {{SortedNumericDocValues}} field
> I considered instead of adding new classes an optional selector parameter to 
> the existing \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource, but I think adding 
> different classes makes a cleaner API and it’s clear that for MultiValued* 
> case, the selector is a mandatory parameter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for 6.4 (RC1)

[Tomás Fernández Löbbe]

+1
Thanks Cassandra

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Cassandra Targett 
wrote:

> Please vote for the release of the Apache Solr Reference Guide for 6.4.
>
> Artifacts are available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-
> guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4-RC1
>
> $ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4-RC1/apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4.pdf.sha1
> 4396f8f7a26e55cb920b3b6ac82627ca96814014  apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4.pdf
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Thanks,
> Cassandra
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 2808 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/2808/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -client -XX:+UseG1GC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff

Error Message:
expected: but was:

Stack Trace:
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but 
was:
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([85249BE6D6931037:40325F7DC6252857]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:125)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:147)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff(MBeansHandlerTest.java:63)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)




Build Log:
[...truncated 12158 lines...]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest
   [junit4]   2> Creating dataDir: 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/solr/build/solr-core/test/J2/temp/solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest_85249BE6D6931037-001/init-core-data-001
   [junit4]   2> 1406653 

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7677) Cache compound filters earlier than regular queries

[Adrien Grand (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-7677:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-7677.patch

Here is a patch that implements this idea.

> Cache compound filters earlier than regular queries
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-7677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7677
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Adrien Grand
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-7677.patch
>
>
> Say you keep reusing a boolean filter that looks like "A OR B" and never use 
> the A and B queries out of that boolean query. Currently, after this filter 
> has been used 5 times, we would cache both A, B and "A OR B", which means 
> that cache entries for A and B would only be built for the purpose of 
> building a cache entry for "A OR B", which is wasteful.
> By caching compound queries a bit earlier, we could make it less likely to 
> happen since:
>  - we only consider queries as consumed if a scorer is pulled
>  - once the boolean query is cached, we stop pulling scorers on the A and B 
> queries



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7677) Cache compound filters earlier than regular queries

[Adrien Grand (JIRA)]

Adrien Grand created LUCENE-7677:


 Summary: Cache compound filters earlier than regular queries
 Key: LUCENE-7677
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7677
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Adrien Grand
Priority: Minor


Say you keep reusing a boolean filter that looks like "A OR B" and never use 
the A and B queries out of that boolean query. Currently, after this filter has 
been used 5 times, we would cache both A, B and "A OR B", which means that 
cache entries for A and B would only be built for the purpose of building a 
cache entry for "A OR B", which is wasteful.

By caching compound queries a bit earlier, we could make it less likely to 
happen since:
 - we only consider queries as consumed if a scorer is pulled
 - once the boolean query is cached, we stop pulling scorers on the A and B 
queries



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for 6.4 (RC1)

[Cassandra Targett]

Please vote for the release of the Apache Solr Reference Guide for 6.4.

Artifacts are available from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4-RC1

$ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4-RC1/apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4.pdf.sha1
4396f8f7a26e55cb920b3b6ac82627ca96814014  apache-solr-ref-guide-6.4.pdf

Here's my +1.

Thanks,
Cassandra

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1116 - Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1116/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.update.TestInPlaceUpdatesDistrib.test

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([658ED2998B1B4B22:EDDAED4325E726DA]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNull(Assert.java:551)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNull(Assert.java:562)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.TestInPlaceUpdatesDistrib.testDBQUsingUpdatedFieldFromDroppedUpdate(TestInPlaceUpdatesDistrib.java:1095)
at 
org.apache.solr.update.TestInPlaceUpdatesDistrib.test(TestInPlaceUpdatesDistrib.java:139)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:985)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:960)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7673) Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854527#comment-15854527
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7673:
-

Commit 7f13105fbe0023771b581c0423df7eaa6a76335e in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from Tomas Fernandez Lobbe
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=7f13105 ]

LUCENE-7673: Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for 
SortedNumericDocValues


> Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7673
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Attachments: LUCENE-7673.patch
>
>
> Right now \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource can give a {{ValueSource}} 
> view of a {{NumericDocValues}} field. This Jira is to add 
> MultiValued\[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource that given a 
> {{SortedNumericSelector.Type}} can give a {{ValueSource}} view of a 
> {{SortedNumericDocValues}} field
> I considered instead of adding new classes an optional selector parameter to 
> the existing \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource, but I think adding 
> different classes makes a cleaner API and it’s clear that for MultiValued* 
> case, the selector is a mandatory parameter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7673) Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues

[David Smiley (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854481#comment-15854481
 ] 

David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7673:
--

Again; it can wait for another issue of course.  Your proposed name 
{{DoubleValuesSource.fromMultiValuedDoubleField(...)}} seems plausible... or 
perhaps simply overload {{fromDoubleField(...)}} to have one that takes the 
selector for how to treat a multi-valued field.

> Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7673
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Attachments: LUCENE-7673.patch
>
>
> Right now \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource can give a {{ValueSource}} 
> view of a {{NumericDocValues}} field. This Jira is to add 
> MultiValued\[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource that given a 
> {{SortedNumericSelector.Type}} can give a {{ValueSource}} view of a 
> {{SortedNumericDocValues}} field
> I considered instead of adding new classes an optional selector parameter to 
> the existing \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource, but I think adding 
> different classes makes a cleaner API and it’s clear that for MultiValued* 
> case, the selector is a mandatory parameter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7410) Make cache keys and closed listeners less trappy

[Adrien Grand (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-7410:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-7410.patch

I rebased this patch to current master. I would appreciate if someone can have 
a look as I think it'd be nice to make caching less trappy for 7.0.

> Make cache keys and closed listeners less trappy
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7410
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Attachments: LUCENE-7410.patch, LUCENE-7410.patch, LUCENE-7410.patch
>
>
> IndexReader currently exposes getCoreCacheKey(), 
> getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey(), addCoreClosedListener() and 
> addReaderClosedListener(). They are typically used to manage resources whose 
> lifetime needs to mimic the lifetime of segments/indexes, typically caches.
> I think this is trappy for various reasons:
> h3. Memory leaks
> When maintaining a cache, entries are added to the cache based on the cache 
> key and then evicted using the cache key that is given back by the close 
> listener, so it is very important that both keys are the same.
> But if a filter reader happens to delegate get*Key() and not 
> add*ClosedListener() or vice-versa then there is potential for a memory leak 
> since the closed listener will be called on a different key and entries will 
> never be evicted from the cache.
> h3. Lifetime expectations
> The expectation of using the core cache key is that it will not change in 
> case of deletions, but this is only true on SegmentReader and LeafReader 
> impls that delegate to it. Other implementations such as composite readers or 
> parallel leaf readers use the same key for "core" and "combined core and 
> deletes".
> h3. Throw-away wrappers cause cache trashing
> An application might want to either expose more (with a ParrallelReader or 
> MultiReader) or less information (by filtering fields/docs that can be seen) 
> depending on the user who is logged in. In that case the application would 
> typically maintain a DirectoryReader and then wrap it per request depending 
> on the logged user and throw away the wrapper once the request is completed.
> The problem is that these wrappers have their own cache keys and the 
> application may build something costly and put it in a cache to throw it away 
> a couple milliseconds later. I would rather like for such readers to have a 
> way to opt out from caching on order to avoid this performance trap.
> h3. Type safety
> The keys that are exposed are plain java.lang.Object instances, which 
> requires caches to look like a {{Map}} which makes it very easy to 
> either try to get, put or remove on the wrong object since any object would 
> be accepted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10036) Revise jackson-core version from 2.5.4 to latest

[Mike Drob (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854471#comment-15854471
 ] 

Mike Drob commented on SOLR-10036:
--

bq. Realized that I was running tests as root, which makes some of them fail. 
Trying again as a regular user.
[~elyograg] - already filed as SOLR-10027 :)

> Revise jackson-core version from 2.5.4 to latest
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10036
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10036
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Shashank Pedamallu
> Attachments: SOLR-10036.patch
>
>
> The current jackson-core dependency in Solr is not compatible with Amazon AWS 
> S3 dependency. AWS S3 requires jackson-core-2.6.6 while Solr uses 
> jackson-core-dependency-2.5.4. This is blocking the usage of latest updates 
> from S3.
> It would be greatly helpful if someone could revise the jackson-core jar in 
> Solr to the latest version. This is a ShowStopper for our Public company.
> Details of my Setup:
> Solr Version: 6.3
> AWS SDK version: 1.11.76



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10036) Revise jackson-core version from 2.5.4 to latest

[Kevin Risden (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854469#comment-15854469
 ] 

Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-10036:
-

[~elyograg] - the change looks reasonable to me. planning to commit?

[~spedamallu] - If this gets committed, it would be in the next minor release 
of 6.x. That is 6.5 as of right now. 

> Revise jackson-core version from 2.5.4 to latest
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10036
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10036
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Shashank Pedamallu
> Attachments: SOLR-10036.patch
>
>
> The current jackson-core dependency in Solr is not compatible with Amazon AWS 
> S3 dependency. AWS S3 requires jackson-core-2.6.6 while Solr uses 
> jackson-core-dependency-2.5.4. This is blocking the usage of latest updates 
> from S3.
> It would be greatly helpful if someone could revise the jackson-core jar in 
> Solr to the latest version. This is a ShowStopper for our Public company.
> Details of my Setup:
> Solr Version: 6.3
> AWS SDK version: 1.11.76



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8593) Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler

[Joel Bernstein (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854454#comment-15854454
 ] 

Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-8593 at 2/6/17 5:59 PM:
--

After adjusting the SolrFilterRule to allow filters on expressions, the having 
filter now shows up above the SolrAggregate:

SolrFilter
SolrAggregate
SolrFilter
SolrTableScan

The first SolrFilter listed is the Having clause and second SolrFilter is the 
WHERE clause.

The next step is to recognize the different types of filters and build a 
HavingStream for the having filter. I'll be working on plugging this in.





was (Author: joel.bernstein):
After adjusting the SolrFilterRule to allow filters on expressions, the having 
filter now shows up above the SolrAggregate:

SolrFilter
SolrAggregate
SolrFilter
SolrTableScan

The first SolrFilter listed is the Having clause and second SolrFilter is the 
WHERE clause.

The next step is to recognize the different types of filters and build a 
HavingStream for having filter. I'll be working on plugging this in.




> Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-8593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Parallel SQL
>Reporter: Joel Bernstein
>Assignee: Joel Bernstein
> Fix For: 6.5, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch
>
>
>The Presto SQL Parser was perfect for phase one of the SQLHandler. It was 
> nicely split off from the larger Presto project and it did everything that 
> was needed for the initial implementation.
> Phase two of the SQL work though will require an optimizer. Here is where 
> Apache Calcite comes into play. It has a battle tested cost based optimizer 
> and has been integrated into Apache Drill and Hive.
> This work can begin in trunk following the 6.0 release. The final query plans 
> will continue to be translated to Streaming API objects (TupleStreams), so 
> continued work on the JDBC driver should plug in nicely with the Calcite work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8593) Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler

[Joel Bernstein (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854454#comment-15854454
 ] 

Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-8593 at 2/6/17 5:58 PM:
--

After adjusting the SolrFilterRule to allow filters on expressions, the having 
filter now shows up above the SolrAggregate:

SolrFilter
SolrAggregate
SolrFilter
SolrTableScan

The first SolrFilter listed in the Having clause and second SolrFilter is WHERE 
clause.

The next step is to recognize the different types of filters and build a 
HavingStream for having filter. I'll be working on plugging this in.





was (Author: joel.bernstein):
After adjusting the SolrFilterRule to allow filters on expressions the having 
filter now shows up following the SolrAggregate:

SolrFilter
SolrAggregate
SolrFilter
SolrTableScan

The first SolrFilter listed in the Having clause and second SolrFilter is WHERE 
clause.

The next step is to recognize the different types of filters and build a 
HavingStream for having filter. I'll be working on plugging this in.




> Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-8593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Parallel SQL
>Reporter: Joel Bernstein
>Assignee: Joel Bernstein
> Fix For: 6.5, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch
>
>
>The Presto SQL Parser was perfect for phase one of the SQLHandler. It was 
> nicely split off from the larger Presto project and it did everything that 
> was needed for the initial implementation.
> Phase two of the SQL work though will require an optimizer. Here is where 
> Apache Calcite comes into play. It has a battle tested cost based optimizer 
> and has been integrated into Apache Drill and Hive.
> This work can begin in trunk following the 6.0 release. The final query plans 
> will continue to be translated to Streaming API objects (TupleStreams), so 
> continued work on the JDBC driver should plug in nicely with the Calcite work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8593) Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler

[Joel Bernstein (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854454#comment-15854454
 ] 

Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-8593 at 2/6/17 5:58 PM:
--

After adjusting the SolrFilterRule to allow filters on expressions, the having 
filter now shows up above the SolrAggregate:

SolrFilter
SolrAggregate
SolrFilter
SolrTableScan

The first SolrFilter listed is the Having clause and second SolrFilter is the 
WHERE clause.

The next step is to recognize the different types of filters and build a 
HavingStream for having filter. I'll be working on plugging this in.





was (Author: joel.bernstein):
After adjusting the SolrFilterRule to allow filters on expressions, the having 
filter now shows up above the SolrAggregate:

SolrFilter
SolrAggregate
SolrFilter
SolrTableScan

The first SolrFilter listed in the Having clause and second SolrFilter is WHERE 
clause.

The next step is to recognize the different types of filters and build a 
HavingStream for having filter. I'll be working on plugging this in.




> Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-8593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Parallel SQL
>Reporter: Joel Bernstein
>Assignee: Joel Bernstein
> Fix For: 6.5, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch
>
>
>The Presto SQL Parser was perfect for phase one of the SQLHandler. It was 
> nicely split off from the larger Presto project and it did everything that 
> was needed for the initial implementation.
> Phase two of the SQL work though will require an optimizer. Here is where 
> Apache Calcite comes into play. It has a battle tested cost based optimizer 
> and has been integrated into Apache Drill and Hive.
> This work can begin in trunk following the 6.0 release. The final query plans 
> will continue to be translated to Streaming API objects (TupleStreams), so 
> continued work on the JDBC driver should plug in nicely with the Calcite work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7673) Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues

[JIRA]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854455#comment-15854455
 ] 

Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on LUCENE-7673:
---

Thanks for the review David!
bq.  It'd be nice if {{DoubleValueSource}} and {{LongValueSource}}...
Maybe we can add them later if needed? It looks like {{DoubleValueSource}} and 
{{LongValueSource}} instances can be obtained with 
{{ValueSource#asDoubleValuesSource()}} and 
{{ValueSource#asLongValuesSource()}}, is there anything else you'd add? Maybe 
the helper methods {{DoubleValuesSource.fromMultiValuedDoubleField(...)}}?

> Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues
> 
>
> Key: LUCENE-7673
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Attachments: LUCENE-7673.patch
>
>
> Right now \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource can give a {{ValueSource}} 
> view of a {{NumericDocValues}} field. This Jira is to add 
> MultiValued\[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource that given a 
> {{SortedNumericSelector.Type}} can give a {{ValueSource}} view of a 
> {{SortedNumericDocValues}} field
> I considered instead of adding new classes an optional selector parameter to 
> the existing \[Int/Long/Float/Double\]FieldSource, but I think adding 
> different classes makes a cleaner API and it’s clear that for MultiValued* 
> case, the selector is a mandatory parameter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8593) Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler

[Joel Bernstein (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854454#comment-15854454
 ] 

Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-8593:
--

After adjusting the SolrFilterRule to allow filters on expressions the having 
filter now shows up following the SolrAggregate:

SolrFilter
SolrAggregate
SolrFilter
SolrTableScan

The first SolrFilter listed in the Having clause and second SolrFilter is WHERE 
clause.

The next step is to recognize the different types of filters and build a 
HavingStream for having filter. I'll be working on plugging this in.




> Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-8593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Parallel SQL
>Reporter: Joel Bernstein
>Assignee: Joel Bernstein
> Fix For: 6.5, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch
>
>
>The Presto SQL Parser was perfect for phase one of the SQLHandler. It was 
> nicely split off from the larger Presto project and it did everything that 
> was needed for the initial implementation.
> Phase two of the SQL work though will require an optimizer. Here is where 
> Apache Calcite comes into play. It has a battle tested cost based optimizer 
> and has been integrated into Apache Drill and Hive.
> This work can begin in trunk following the 6.0 release. The final query plans 
> will continue to be translated to Streaming API objects (TupleStreams), so 
> continued work on the JDBC driver should plug in nicely with the Calcite work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 18915 - Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/18915/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -client -XX:+UseG1GC

2 tests failed.
FAILED:  
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.TestSolrCloudWithSecureImpersonation

Error Message:
2 threads leaked from SUITE scope at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.TestSolrCloudWithSecureImpersonation: 1) 
Thread[id=14353, name=jetty-launcher-2491-thread-1-EventThread, 
state=TIMED_WAITING, group=TGRP-TestSolrCloudWithSecureImpersonation] 
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1037)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1328)
 at java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:277)  
   at 
org.apache.curator.CuratorZookeeperClient.internalBlockUntilConnectedOrTimedOut(CuratorZookeeperClient.java:323)
 at org.apache.curator.RetryLoop.callWithRetry(RetryLoop.java:105)  
   at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.GetDataBuilderImpl.pathInForeground(GetDataBuilderImpl.java:288)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.GetDataBuilderImpl.forPath(GetDataBuilderImpl.java:279)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.GetDataBuilderImpl.forPath(GetDataBuilderImpl.java:41)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.shared.SharedValue.readValue(SharedValue.java:244)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.shared.SharedValue.access$100(SharedValue.java:44)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.shared.SharedValue$1.process(SharedValue.java:61)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.NamespaceWatcher.process(NamespaceWatcher.java:67)
 at 
org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.processEvent(ClientCnxn.java:522)   
  at org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:498)   
 2) Thread[id=14341, name=jetty-launcher-2491-thread-2-EventThread, 
state=TIMED_WAITING, group=TGRP-TestSolrCloudWithSecureImpersonation] 
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1037)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1328)
 at java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:277)  
   at 
org.apache.curator.CuratorZookeeperClient.internalBlockUntilConnectedOrTimedOut(CuratorZookeeperClient.java:323)
 at org.apache.curator.RetryLoop.callWithRetry(RetryLoop.java:105)  
   at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.GetDataBuilderImpl.pathInForeground(GetDataBuilderImpl.java:288)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.GetDataBuilderImpl.forPath(GetDataBuilderImpl.java:279)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.GetDataBuilderImpl.forPath(GetDataBuilderImpl.java:41)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.shared.SharedValue.readValue(SharedValue.java:244)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.shared.SharedValue.access$100(SharedValue.java:44)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.shared.SharedValue$1.process(SharedValue.java:61)
 at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.NamespaceWatcher.process(NamespaceWatcher.java:67)
 at 
org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.processEvent(ClientCnxn.java:522)   
  at org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:498)

Stack Trace:
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakError: 2 threads leaked from SUITE 
scope at org.apache.solr.cloud.TestSolrCloudWithSecureImpersonation: 
   1) Thread[id=14353, name=jetty-launcher-2491-thread-1-EventThread, 
state=TIMED_WAITING, group=TGRP-TestSolrCloudWithSecureImpersonation]
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1037)
at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1328)
at java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:277)
at 
org.apache.curator.CuratorZookeeperClient.internalBlockUntilConnectedOrTimedOut(CuratorZookeeperClient.java:323)
at org.apache.curator.RetryLoop.callWithRetry(RetryLoop.java:105)
at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.GetDataBuilderImpl.pathInForeground(GetDataBuilderImpl.java:288)
at 
org.apache.curator.framework.imps.GetDataBuilderImpl.forPath(GetDataBuilderImpl.java:279)
at 

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10036) Revise jackson-core version from 2.5.4 to latest

[Shashank Pedamallu (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854386#comment-15854386
 ] 

Shashank Pedamallu commented on SOLR-10036:
---

Hi,

Thank you for working on this issue. Can someone comment on when this change 
can be visible in a release approximately.

Thanks,
Shashank

> Revise jackson-core version from 2.5.4 to latest
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10036
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10036
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Shashank Pedamallu
> Attachments: SOLR-10036.patch
>
>
> The current jackson-core dependency in Solr is not compatible with Amazon AWS 
> S3 dependency. AWS S3 requires jackson-core-2.6.6 while Solr uses 
> jackson-core-dependency-2.5.4. This is blocking the usage of latest updates 
> from S3.
> It would be greatly helpful if someone could revise the jackson-core jar in 
> Solr to the latest version. This is a ShowStopper for our Public company.
> Details of my Setup:
> Solr Version: 6.3
> AWS SDK version: 1.11.76



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 681 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX/681/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff

Error Message:
expected: but was:

Stack Trace:
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but 
was:
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([FCF3196C70BFDC2F:39E5DDF76009E44F]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:125)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:147)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff(MBeansHandlerTest.java:63)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)




Build Log:
[...truncated 10885 lines...]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest
   [junit4]   2> Creating dataDir: 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX/solr/build/solr-core/test/J1/temp/solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest_FCF3196C70BFDC2F-001/init-core-data-001
   

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10077) TestManagedFeatureStore extends LuceneTestCase, but has no tests and just hosts a static method.

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854351#comment-15854351
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10077:


Commit a22681c8594cd9b97bc6d013acb0bdf61835d2a0 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6x from [~cpoerschke]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=a22681c ]

SOLR-10077: merge TestFeatureStore and TestFeatureLtrScoringModel into 
TestManagedFeatureStore.


> TestManagedFeatureStore extends LuceneTestCase, but has no tests and just 
> hosts a static method.
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10077
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10077
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-10077.patch
>
>
> We should probably just put this static method somewhere else?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9552) Upgrade to Tika 1.14 when available

[Tim Allison (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854344#comment-15854344
 ] 

Tim Allison commented on SOLR-9552:
---

Make sure to include curvesapi

> Upgrade to Tika 1.14 when available
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-9552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9552
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: contrib - DataImportHandler
>Reporter: Tim Allison
>
>  Let's upgrade Solr as soon as 1.14 is available.
> P.S. I _think_ we're soon to wrap up work on 1.14.  Any last requests? 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10077) TestManagedFeatureStore extends LuceneTestCase, but has no tests and just hosts a static method.

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854320#comment-15854320
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10077:


Commit f47bbb35ae7821171038e058a089a49598bdb8f2 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~cpoerschke]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=f47bbb3 ]

SOLR-10077: merge TestFeatureStore and TestFeatureLtrScoringModel into 
TestManagedFeatureStore.


> TestManagedFeatureStore extends LuceneTestCase, but has no tests and just 
> hosts a static method.
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-10077
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10077
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Mark Miller
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-10077.patch
>
>
> We should probably just put this static method somewhere else?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 117 - Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/117/
Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC

4 tests failed.
FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicZkTest

Error Message:
SolrCore.getOpenCount()==2

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: SolrCore.getOpenCount()==2
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([5DFA36307FEA60D4]:0)
at org.apache.solr.util.TestHarness.close(TestHarness.java:373)
at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.deleteCore(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:731)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.AbstractZkTestCase.azt_afterClass(AbstractZkTestCase.java:143)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:543)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:870)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:367)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)


FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicZkTest

Error Message:
SolrCore.getOpenCount()==2

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: SolrCore.getOpenCount()==2
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([5DFA36307FEA60D4]:0)
at org.apache.solr.util.TestHarness.close(TestHarness.java:373)
at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.deleteCore(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:731)
at 
org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.teardownTestCases(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:261)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor26.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:543)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:870)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8593) Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler

[Joel Bernstein (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854271#comment-15854271
 ] 

Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-8593:
--

Currently working on pushing down the Having expression. I looked at possibly 
not implementing the Having push down but it turns out in certain scenarios if 
we don't push down having we don't produce a proper result.

> Integrate Apache Calcite into the SQLHandler
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-8593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8593
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Parallel SQL
>Reporter: Joel Bernstein
>Assignee: Joel Bernstein
> Fix For: 6.5, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch, SOLR-8593.patch
>
>
>The Presto SQL Parser was perfect for phase one of the SQLHandler. It was 
> nicely split off from the larger Presto project and it did everything that 
> was needed for the initial implementation.
> Phase two of the SQL work though will require an optimizer. Here is where 
> Apache Calcite comes into play. It has a battle tested cost based optimizer 
> and has been integrated into Apache Drill and Hive.
> This work can begin in trunk following the 6.0 release. The final query plans 
> will continue to be translated to Streaming API objects (TupleStreams), so 
> continued work on the JDBC driver should plug in nicely with the Calcite work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9800) FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method

[Christine Poerschke (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854250#comment-15854250
 ] 

Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-9800:
---

side note: discovered {{git --apply --3way}} here because via just {{git 
--apply}} the patch no longer applied cleanly.

> FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-9800
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jonny Marks
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 6.x, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-9800.patch
>
>
> This patch moves the construction of SimpleFacets from inside process() to a 
> new protected method, allowing contrib modules to reuse FacetComponent with a 
> different SimpleFacets implementation.
> For example:
> {code}
> class MyFacetComponent extends FacetComponent {
>   @Override
>   protected SimpleFacets newSimpleFacets(SolrQueryRequest req, DocSet docSet, 
> SolrParams params, ResponseBuilder rb) {
> return new SimpleFacets(req, docSet, params, rb) {
>   @Override
>   protected Predicate newBytesRefFilter(String field, 
> SolrParams params) {
> ...
> return new MyBytesRefFilter (...);
>   }
> };
>   }
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-9800) FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method

[Christine Poerschke (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christine Poerschke resolved SOLR-9800.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: master (7.0)
   6.x

Thanks Jonny!

> FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-9800
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jonny Marks
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 6.x, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-9800.patch
>
>
> This patch moves the construction of SimpleFacets from inside process() to a 
> new protected method, allowing contrib modules to reuse FacetComponent with a 
> different SimpleFacets implementation.
> For example:
> {code}
> class MyFacetComponent extends FacetComponent {
>   @Override
>   protected SimpleFacets newSimpleFacets(SolrQueryRequest req, DocSet docSet, 
> SolrParams params, ResponseBuilder rb) {
> return new SimpleFacets(req, docSet, params, rb) {
>   @Override
>   protected Predicate newBytesRefFilter(String field, 
> SolrParams params) {
> ...
> return new MyBytesRefFilter (...);
>   }
> };
>   }
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9800) FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854249#comment-15854249
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9800:
---

Commit be87c9b892c016e58ad981fd900e1a5024a70967 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6x from [~cpoerschke]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=be87c9b ]

SOLR-9800: Factor out FacetComponent.newSimpleFacets method. (Jonny Marks via 
Christine Poerschke)


> FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-9800
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jonny Marks
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-9800.patch
>
>
> This patch moves the construction of SimpleFacets from inside process() to a 
> new protected method, allowing contrib modules to reuse FacetComponent with a 
> different SimpleFacets implementation.
> For example:
> {code}
> class MyFacetComponent extends FacetComponent {
>   @Override
>   protected SimpleFacets newSimpleFacets(SolrQueryRequest req, DocSet docSet, 
> SolrParams params, ResponseBuilder rb) {
> return new SimpleFacets(req, docSet, params, rb) {
>   @Override
>   protected Predicate newBytesRefFilter(String field, 
> SolrParams params) {
> ...
> return new MyBytesRefFilter (...);
>   }
> };
>   }
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master - Build # 1230 - Still Unstable

[Apache Jenkins Server]

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master/1230/

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores

Error Message:
ObjectTracker found 5 object(s) that were not released!!! 
[MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor, MMapDirectory, MMapDirectory, MMapDirectory, 
SolrCore] 
org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker$ObjectTrackerException  at 
org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker.track(ObjectReleaseTracker.java:43)
  at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.(SolrCore.java:848)  at 
org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.(SolrCore.java:825)  at 
org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:928)  at 
org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.getCore(CoreContainer.java:1295)  at 
org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores.testNoCommit(TestLazyCores.java:772)  at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)  at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)  
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
  at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
  at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)  
org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker$ObjectTrackerException  at 
org.apache.solr.common.util.ObjectReleaseTracker.track(ObjectReleaseTracker.java:43)
  at 
org.apache.solr.core.CachingDirectoryFactory.get(CachingDirectoryFactory.java:347)
  at 
org.apache.solr.core.MetricsDirectoryFactory.get(MetricsDirectoryFactory.java:195)
  

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9800) FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854221#comment-15854221
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9800:
---

Commit ef03480743d8d9ff28e34eb6e3af92cb33022ec6 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~cpoerschke]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=ef03480 ]

SOLR-9800: Factor out FacetComponent.newSimpleFacets method. (Jonny Marks via 
Christine Poerschke)


> FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-9800
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jonny Marks
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-9800.patch
>
>
> This patch moves the construction of SimpleFacets from inside process() to a 
> new protected method, allowing contrib modules to reuse FacetComponent with a 
> different SimpleFacets implementation.
> For example:
> {code}
> class MyFacetComponent extends FacetComponent {
>   @Override
>   protected SimpleFacets newSimpleFacets(SolrQueryRequest req, DocSet docSet, 
> SolrParams params, ResponseBuilder rb) {
> return new SimpleFacets(req, docSet, params, rb) {
>   @Override
>   protected Predicate newBytesRefFilter(String field, 
> SolrParams params) {
> ...
> return new MyBytesRefFilter (...);
>   }
> };
>   }
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 2807 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/2807/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff

Error Message:
expected: but was:

Stack Trace:
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but 
was:
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([49A59B952CC708B2:8CB35F0E3C7130D2]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:125)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:147)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff(MBeansHandlerTest.java:63)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:543)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:53)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:54)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)


FAILED:  org.apache.solr.handler.admin.TestApiFramework.testFramework

Error Message:


Stack Trace:
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([49A59B952CC708B2:5ED351B22A13E48F]:0)
at 
net.sf.cglib.core.KeyFactory$Generator.generateClass(KeyFactory.java:166)
at 

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 3816 - Still Unstable!

[Policeman Jenkins Server]

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/3816/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.test

Error Message:
Could not find collection:collection2

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Could not find collection:collection2
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([4E9ECDF09D230F36:C6CAF22A33DF62CE]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:526)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.AbstractDistribZkTestBase.waitForRecoveriesToFinish(AbstractDistribZkTestBase.java:159)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.AbstractDistribZkTestBase.waitForRecoveriesToFinish(AbstractDistribZkTestBase.java:144)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.AbstractDistribZkTestBase.waitForRecoveriesToFinish(AbstractDistribZkTestBase.java:139)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase.waitForRecoveriesToFinish(AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase.java:856)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.testIndexingBatchPerRequestWithHttpSolrClient(FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.java:620)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.test(FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.java:152)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1713)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:907)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:943)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:957)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:985)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:960)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:64)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:47)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:368)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:817)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:468)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:916)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:802)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:852)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:863)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:41)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7651) Javadocs build fails with Java 8 update 121

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854186#comment-15854186
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7651:
-

Commit 9dcfcb6e6fcbab36d50c4baca697c1104c2a72ff in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~jpountz]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=9dcfcb6 ]

LUCENE-7651: Move under the 6.4.1 section.


> Javadocs build fails with Java 8 update 121
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-7651
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: general/javadocs
>Affects Versions: 6.4
> Environment: Java 8 update 121
>Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>Priority: Critical
>  Labels: Java8
> Fix For: 6.x, master (7.0), 6.5, 6.4.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7651.patch, LUCENE-7651.patch, LUCENE-7651.patch, 
> LUCENE-7651.patch
>
>
> Oracle released the recent Java 8 security update (u121). The Jenkins builds 
> fail with the following error while building the Javadocs:
> {noformat}
>   [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information...
>   [javadoc] javadoc: error - Argument for -bottom contains JavaScript.
>   [javadoc] Use --allow-script-in-comments to allow use of JavaScript.
>   [javadoc] 1 error
> {noformat}
> This is caused by the Javascript added to pretty-print code examples. We load 
> this in the page footer "{{}}" parameter.
> Surely, it will be posisble to simply add the mentioned argument, but this 
> will break builds with earlier Java 8 versions.
> This is nowhere documented, I haven't seen any documentation about this flag 
> nowhere, so I assume this is a bug in Java. They can't change or add command 
> line parameters in minor updates of Java 8. I will ask on the OpenJDK mailing 
> lists if this is a bug (maybe accidentally backported from Java 9).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7651) Javadocs build fails with Java 8 update 121

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854184#comment-15854184
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7651:
-

Commit d3a2ed8487f3934d53f864b092f91966814d4cf7 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6x from [~jpountz]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=d3a2ed8 ]

LUCENE-7651: Move under the 6.4.1 section.


> Javadocs build fails with Java 8 update 121
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-7651
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: general/javadocs
>Affects Versions: 6.4
> Environment: Java 8 update 121
>Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>Priority: Critical
>  Labels: Java8
> Fix For: 6.x, master (7.0), 6.5, 6.4.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7651.patch, LUCENE-7651.patch, LUCENE-7651.patch, 
> LUCENE-7651.patch
>
>
> Oracle released the recent Java 8 security update (u121). The Jenkins builds 
> fail with the following error while building the Javadocs:
> {noformat}
>   [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information...
>   [javadoc] javadoc: error - Argument for -bottom contains JavaScript.
>   [javadoc] Use --allow-script-in-comments to allow use of JavaScript.
>   [javadoc] 1 error
> {noformat}
> This is caused by the Javascript added to pretty-print code examples. We load 
> this in the page footer "{{}}" parameter.
> Surely, it will be posisble to simply add the mentioned argument, but this 
> will break builds with earlier Java 8 versions.
> This is nowhere documented, I haven't seen any documentation about this flag 
> nowhere, so I assume this is a bug in Java. They can't change or add command 
> line parameters in minor updates of Java 8. I will ask on the OpenJDK mailing 
> lists if this is a bug (maybe accidentally backported from Java 9).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 6.4.1 released

[Adrien Grand]

6 February 2017, Apache Solr™ 6.4.1 available

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 6.4.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search and analytics, rich
document parsing, geospatial search, extensive REST APIs as well as
parallel SQL. Solr is enterprise grade, secure and highly scalable,
providing fault tolerant distributed search and indexing, and powers
the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest
internet sites.Solr 6.4.1 is available for immediate download at:
  http://lucene.apache.org/solr/mirrors-solr-latest-redir.htmlPlease
read CHANGES.txt for a full list of new features and changes:
  https://lucene.apache.org/solr/6_4_1/changes/Changes.htmlSolr 6.4.1
contains 5 bug fixes since the 6.4.0 release: * "Plugin/Stats" section
of the UI doesn't display empty metric types * SOLR_SSL_OPTS was
mistakenly overwritten in solr.cmd * Better validation of filename
params in ReplicationHandler * Core swapping did not work with new
metrics changes in place * Admin UI could not find DataImport handlers
due to metrics changes * AnalyzingInfixSuggester/BlendedInfixSuggester
now work with core reloadFurther details of changes are available in
the change log available at:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/6_4_1/changes/Changes.htmlPlease report
any feedback to the mailing lists
(http://lucene.apache.org/solr/discussion.html)Note: The Apache
Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network for
distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using
may not have replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please
try another mirror. This also applies to Maven access.

-- 
Adrien

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 6.4.1 released

[Adrien Grand]

6 February 2017, Apache Lucene™ 6.4.1 available

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 6.4.1

Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine
library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly
any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform.

This release contains 4 bug fixes since the 6.4.0 release:

 * Javadocs now build successfully with Java 8u121
 * Fixed memory leak in the case that TermQuery or SpanTermQuery objects
that wrap a TermContext were cached
 * Fixed native memory leak when the codec is configured with the
BEST_COMPRESSION option
 * AnalyzingInfixSuggester now only opens an IndexWriter when changes need
to be applied

The release is available for immediate download at:

  http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/lucene/java/6.4.1

Please read CHANGES.txt for a full list of new features and changes:

  https://lucene.apache.org/core/6_4_1/changes/Changes.html

Please report any feedback to the mailing lists
(http://lucene.apache.org/core/discussion.html)

Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network
for distributing releases.  It is possible that the mirror you are using
may not have replicated the release yet.  If that is the case, please
try another mirror.  This also goes for Maven access.

-- 
Adrien

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7676) FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods

[Adrien Grand (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854138#comment-15854138
 ] 

Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7676:
--

+1 too

> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods
> --
>
> Key: LUCENE-7676
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Christine Poerschke
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-7676.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7667) BKDReader could call grow on larger increments

[Adrien Grand (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-7667.
--
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 6.5
   master (7.0)

> BKDReader could call grow on larger increments
> --
>
> Key: LUCENE-7667
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7667
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Adrien Grand
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: master (7.0), 6.5
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7667.patch
>
>
> Currently, we only call grow() on leaf nodes. We could make it grow with 
> larger increments by calling grow() on the number of leaf cells under the 
> current node when the relation is CELL_INSIDE_QUERY (logic that we already 
> have for point count estimations).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7676) FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods

[Robert Muir (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854131#comment-15854131
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7676:
-

looks good.

i think the {{@Test}} can be dropped from the test case.

> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods
> --
>
> Key: LUCENE-7676
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Christine Poerschke
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-7676.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6989) Implement MMapDirectory unmapping for coming Java 9 changes

[Uwe Schindler (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-6989:
--
Fix Version/s: 5.5.4

> Implement MMapDirectory unmapping for coming Java 9 changes
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-6989
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6989
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: core/store
>Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>  Labels: Java9
> Fix For: 6.0, 5.5.4, 6.4
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6989-disable5x.patch, 
> LUCENE-6989-disable5x.patch, LUCENE-6989-fixbuild148.patch, 
> LUCENE-6989.patch, LUCENE-6989.patch, LUCENE-6989.patch, LUCENE-6989.patch, 
> LUCENE-6989-v2.patch, LUCENE-6989-v3-post-b148.patch, 
> LUCENE-6989-v3-post-b148.patch, LUCENE-6989-v3-testFixes.patch
>
>
> Originally, the sun.misc.Cleaner interface was declared as "critical API" in 
> [JEP 260|http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/260 ]
> Unfortunately the decission was changed in favor of a oficially supported 
> {{java.lang.ref.Cleaner}} API. A side effect of this change is to move all 
> existing {{sun.misc.Cleaner}} APIs into a non-exported package. This causes 
> our forceful unmapping to no longer work, because we can get the cleaner 
> instance via reflection, but trying to invoke it will throw one of the new 
> Jigsaw RuntimeException because it is completely inaccessible. This will make 
> our forceful unmapping fail. There are also no changes in Garbage collector, 
> the problem still exists.
> For more information see this [mailing list 
> thread|http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-January/thread.html#38243].
> This commit will likely be done, making our unmapping efforts no longer 
> working. Alan Bateman is aware of this issue and will open a new issue at 
> OpenJDK to allow forceful unmapping without using the now private 
> sun.misc.Cleaner. The idea is to let the internal class sun.misc.Cleaner 
> implement the Runable interface, so we can simply cast to runable and call 
> the run() method to unmap. The code would then work. This will lead to minor 
> changes in our unmapper in MMapDirectory: An instanceof check and casting if 
> possible.
> I opened this issue to keep track and implement the changes as soon as 
> possible, so people will have working unmapping when java 9 comes out. 
> Current Lucene versions will no longer work with Java 9.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7676) FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods

[Christine Poerschke (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christine Poerschke updated LUCENE-7676:

Attachment: LUCENE-7676.patch

> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods
> --
>
> Key: LUCENE-7676
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Christine Poerschke
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-7676.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6989) Implement MMapDirectory unmapping for coming Java 9 changes

[Uwe Schindler (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854110#comment-15854110
 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-6989:
---

I will backport the current impl to Lucene 5.5.4.

Give me a day or two.

> Implement MMapDirectory unmapping for coming Java 9 changes
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-6989
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6989
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: core/store
>Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>  Labels: Java9
> Fix For: 6.0, 6.4
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6989-disable5x.patch, 
> LUCENE-6989-disable5x.patch, LUCENE-6989-fixbuild148.patch, 
> LUCENE-6989.patch, LUCENE-6989.patch, LUCENE-6989.patch, LUCENE-6989.patch, 
> LUCENE-6989-v2.patch, LUCENE-6989-v3-post-b148.patch, 
> LUCENE-6989-v3-post-b148.patch, LUCENE-6989-v3-testFixes.patch
>
>
> Originally, the sun.misc.Cleaner interface was declared as "critical API" in 
> [JEP 260|http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/260 ]
> Unfortunately the decission was changed in favor of a oficially supported 
> {{java.lang.ref.Cleaner}} API. A side effect of this change is to move all 
> existing {{sun.misc.Cleaner}} APIs into a non-exported package. This causes 
> our forceful unmapping to no longer work, because we can get the cleaner 
> instance via reflection, but trying to invoke it will throw one of the new 
> Jigsaw RuntimeException because it is completely inaccessible. This will make 
> our forceful unmapping fail. There are also no changes in Garbage collector, 
> the problem still exists.
> For more information see this [mailing list 
> thread|http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-January/thread.html#38243].
> This commit will likely be done, making our unmapping efforts no longer 
> working. Alan Bateman is aware of this issue and will open a new issue at 
> OpenJDK to allow forceful unmapping without using the now private 
> sun.misc.Cleaner. The idea is to let the internal class sun.misc.Cleaner 
> implement the Runable interface, so we can simply cast to runable and call 
> the run() method to unmap. The code would then work. This will lead to minor 
> changes in our unmapper in MMapDirectory: An instanceof check and casting if 
> possible.
> I opened this issue to keep track and implement the changes as soon as 
> possible, so people will have working unmapping when java 9 comes out. 
> Current Lucene versions will no longer work with Java 9.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7676) FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods

[Christine Poerschke (JIRA)]

Christine Poerschke created LUCENE-7676:
---

 Summary: FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods
 Key: LUCENE-7676
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Christine Poerschke
Assignee: Christine Poerschke
Priority: Minor






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7667) BKDReader could call grow on larger increments

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854056#comment-15854056
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7667:
-

Commit 3592af20e7925f0d84ade29c303f06355b5b92c0 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~jpountz]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=3592af2 ]

LUCENE-7667: BKDReader could call IntersectVisitor.grow on larger increments.


> BKDReader could call grow on larger increments
> --
>
> Key: LUCENE-7667
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7667
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Adrien Grand
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-7667.patch
>
>
> Currently, we only call grow() on leaf nodes. We could make it grow with 
> larger increments by calling grow() on the number of leaf cells under the 
> current node when the relation is CELL_INSIDE_QUERY (logic that we already 
> have for point count estimations).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7667) BKDReader could call grow on larger increments

[ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15854059#comment-15854059
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7667:
-

Commit 8e7bf58a130fefa39473edeacad460ff1f7fbdfa in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6x from [~jpountz]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=8e7bf58 ]

LUCENE-7667: BKDReader could call IntersectVisitor.grow on larger increments.


> BKDReader could call grow on larger increments
> --
>
> Key: LUCENE-7667
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7667
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Adrien Grand
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-7667.patch
>
>
> Currently, we only call grow() on leaf nodes. We could make it grow with 
> larger increments by calling grow() on the number of leaf cells under the 
> current node when the relation is CELL_INSIDE_QUERY (logic that we already 
> have for point count estimations).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-6928) Better deal with sparse norms

[Adrien Grand (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-6928.
--
Resolution: Implemented

The Lucene70Codec has sparse norms already.

> Better deal with sparse norms
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-6928
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6928
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Adrien Grand
>Assignee: Adrien Grand
>Priority: Minor
>
> Now that norms are disk-based (since 5.3) we're seeing similar issues as we 
> were having with doc values in case of sparse fields. We could implement a 
> similar approach to what was done in LUCENE-6863 in order to keep things fast 
> in the dense case yet reduce disk requirements in the sparse case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9800) FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method

[Jonny Marks (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jonny Marks updated SOLR-9800:
--
Description: 
This patch moves the construction of SimpleFacets from inside process() to a 
new protected method, allowing contrib modules to reuse FacetComponent with a 
different SimpleFacets implementation.

For example:

{code}
class MyFacetComponent extends FacetComponent {
  @Override
  protected SimpleFacets newSimpleFacets(SolrQueryRequest req, DocSet docSet, 
SolrParams params, ResponseBuilder rb) {
return new SimpleFacets(req, docSet, params, rb) {
  @Override
  protected Predicate newBytesRefFilter(String field, SolrParams 
params) {
...
return new MyBytesRefFilter (...);
  }
};
  }
}
{code}

  was:
This patch moves the construction of SimpleFacets from inside process() to a 
new protected method, allowing contrib modules to reuse FacetComponent with a 
different SimpleFacets implementation.

For example:

{code}
class MyFacetComponent extends FacetComponent {
  @Override
  protected SimpleFacets newSimpleFacets(SolrQueryRequest req, DocSet docSet, 
SolrParams params, ResponseBuilder rb) {
return new SimpleFacets(req, docSet, params, rb) {
  @Override
  protected BytesRefFilter newBytesRefFilter(String field, SolrParams 
params) {
...
return new MyBytesRefFilter (...);
  }
};
  }
}
{code}


> FacetComponent - move construction of SimpleFacets to a protected method
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-9800
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9800
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jonny Marks
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-9800.patch
>
>
> This patch moves the construction of SimpleFacets from inside process() to a 
> new protected method, allowing contrib modules to reuse FacetComponent with a 
> different SimpleFacets implementation.
> For example:
> {code}
> class MyFacetComponent extends FacetComponent {
>   @Override
>   protected SimpleFacets newSimpleFacets(SolrQueryRequest req, DocSet docSet, 
> SolrParams params, ResponseBuilder rb) {
> return new SimpleFacets(req, docSet, params, rb) {
>   @Override
>   protected Predicate newBytesRefFilter(String field, 
> SolrParams params) {
> ...
> return new MyBytesRefFilter (...);
>   }
> };
>   }
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9914) SimpleFacets: refactor "contains" check into "SubstringBytesRefMatcher" class

[Jonny Marks (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jonny Marks updated SOLR-9914:
--
Description: 
This patch refactors the "contains" logic for only including constraints which 
contain a given substring, into a "Predicate" interface and 
"SubstringBytesRefFilter" implementation. 
This allows users to have custom logic for including terms in the filter 
counts, not only based on substring matches.

  was:
This patch refactors the "contains" logic for only including constraints which 
contain a given substring, into a "BytesRefMatcher" interface and 
"SubstringBytesRefMatcher" implementation. 
This allows users to have custom logic for including terms in the filter 
counts, not only based on substring matches.


> SimpleFacets: refactor "contains" check into "SubstringBytesRefMatcher" class
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-9914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9914
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jonny Marks
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-9914.patch, SOLR-9914.patch, SOLR-9914.patch
>
>
> This patch refactors the "contains" logic for only including constraints 
> which contain a given substring, into a "Predicate" interface and 
> "SubstringBytesRefFilter" implementation. 
> This allows users to have custom logic for including terms in the filter 
> counts, not only based on substring matches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9912) SimpleFacets - support facet.excludeTerms parameter

[Jonny Marks (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jonny Marks updated SOLR-9912:
--
Attachment: SOLR-9912.patch

Updating patch after SimpleFacets.contains removed in subtask

> SimpleFacets - support facet.excludeTerms parameter
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-9912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9912
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jonny Marks
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-9912.patch, SOLR-9912.patch, SOLR-9912.patch
>
>
> This ticket is for supporting a new facet.excludeTerms parameter for removing 
> specific terms from the facet counts, without having to exclude the terms 
> from the index itself.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9914) SimpleFacets: refactor "contains" check into "SubstringBytesRefMatcher" class

[Jonny Marks (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jonny Marks updated SOLR-9914:
--
Attachment: SOLR-9914.patch

Removed SimpleFacets.contains

> SimpleFacets: refactor "contains" check into "SubstringBytesRefMatcher" class
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-9914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9914
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jonny Marks
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-9914.patch, SOLR-9914.patch, SOLR-9914.patch
>
>
> This patch refactors the "contains" logic for only including constraints 
> which contain a given substring, into a "BytesRefMatcher" interface and 
> "SubstringBytesRefMatcher" implementation. 
> This allows users to have custom logic for including terms in the filter 
> counts, not only based on substring matches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Backport mmap to 5.5

[Adrien Grand]

Hi Uwe,

It works for me. Thanks for doing it.

Le lun. 6 févr. 2017 à 14:23, Uwe Schindler  a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> I was talking on Saturday with Sanne Grinovero this weekend on FOSDEM.
> Because they have to support the current version of Hibernate Search for
> longer time including Java 9 support, they would like to have current Java
> 9 support backported to 5.5 and 5.3. I told him 5.3 is unlikely to get ever
> released, but he may apply the 5.5 patch to 5.3, too.
>
> As the backport requires some Java 7 changes, I'd like to do this now. So
> give me one or 2 days!
>
> OK?
>
> Uwe
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.5.4

[Adrien Grand]

Thanks Uwe and Steve!

Le lun. 6 févr. 2017 à 14:12, Steve Rowe  a écrit :

> I enabled the already existing 5.5 branch jobs on ASF Jenkins.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > No problem, I'll help! Will do it when back home from Brussels. It is
> more complicated, because it needs Java 7 and smoker should run on both. So
> we should reuse disabled old jobs.
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > Am 6. Februar 2017 12:06:41 MEZ schrieb Adrien Grand  >:
> > Could someone help me enable Jenkins builds on branch_5_5?
> >
> > Le lun. 6 févr. 2017 à 12:02, Adrien Grand  a écrit :
> > I started backporting some changes. Please find below the list of
> changes we have in 5.5.4 for now. Uwe, do you think we should try to
> backport LUCENE-7651 too?
> >
> > * LUCENE-7417: The standard Highlighter could throw an
> IllegalArgumentException when
> >   trying to highlight a query containing a degenerate case of a
> MultiPhraseQuery with one
> >   term.  (Thomas Kappler via David Smiley)
> >
> > * LUCENE-7657: Fixed potential memory leak in the case that a
> (Span)TermQuery
> >   with a TermContext is cached. (Adrien Grand)
> >
> > * LUCENE-7647: Made stored fields reclaim native memory more
> aggressively when
> >   configured with BEST_COMPRESSION. This could otherwise result in
> out-of-memory
> >   issues. (Adrien Grand)
> >
> > * LUCENE-7562: CompletionFieldsConsumer sometimes throws
> >   NullPointerException on ghost fields (Oliver Eilhard via Mike
> McCandless)
> >
> > * LUCENE-7543: Make changes-to-html target an offline operation, by
> moving the
> >   Lucene and Solr DOAP RDF files into the Git source repository under
> >   dev-tools/doap/ and then pulling release dates from those files,
> rather than
> >   from JIRA. (Mano Kovacs, hossman, Steve Rowe)
> >
> > * SOLR-9819: Upgrade commons-fileupload to 1.3.2, fixing a potential
> vulnerability CVE-2016-3092 (Anshum Gupta)
> >
> > * SOLR-10031: Validation of filename params in ReplicationHandler
> (Hrishikesh Gadre, janhoy)
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 3 févr. 2017 à 12:17, Adrien Grand  a écrit :
> > Sure, the list of bugs I gave is not exhaustive. :)
> >
> > By the way I did not say it explicitly but I don't mind being the
> release manager for this release.
> >
> > Le ven. 3 févr. 2017 à 12:16, Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> a écrit :
> > +1
> >
> > I would also like to backport
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7562 for 5.5.4 (and
> > probably there are other bug fixes).
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to propose releasing Lucene/Solr 5.5.4 in order to
> address both
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647 and
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657 like for the 6.4.1
> > > release.
> > >
> > > I propose to start building a RC after 6.4.1 is out in order to not
> have to
> > > RCs running at the same time, which means we could hopefully build the
> first
> > > RC early next week.
> > >
> > > Opinions?
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> > --
> > Uwe Schindler
> > Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Backport mmap to 5.5

[Uwe Schindler]

Hi,

I was talking on Saturday with Sanne Grinovero this weekend on FOSDEM. Because 
they have to support the current version of Hibernate Search for longer time 
including Java 9 support, they would like to have current Java 9 support 
backported to 5.5 and 5.3. I told him 5.3 is unlikely to get ever released, but 
he may apply the 5.5 patch to 5.3, too.

As the backport requires some Java 7 changes, I'd like to do this now. So give 
me one or 2 days!

OK?

Uwe
--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de