Congrats Namgyu!
-Yonik
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:19 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that Namgyu Kim has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to join.
>
> Congratulations and welcome, Namgyu!
>
Congrats Munendra!
-Yonik
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:20 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that Munendra SN has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to join.
>
> Congratulations and welcome, Munendra!
>
Congrats Gus!
-Yonik
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:21 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that Gus Heck has accepted the PMC's invitation
> to join.
>
> Congratulations and welcome, Gus!
>
Welcome Gus!
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:35 AM Namgyu Kim wrote:
> Congratulations Gus! :D
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:31 PM Martin Gainty wrote:
>
>> welcome gus!
>>
>> ~martin~
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Michael McCandless
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 9:59 AM
>>
Welcome Munendra!
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:36 AM Namgyu Kim wrote:
> Congratulations Munendra! :D
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:16 PM Munendra S N
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you all
>>
>> Regards,
>> Munendra S N
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:45 PM Michael McCandless <
>>
Welcome Namgyu!
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:35 AM Namgyu Kim wrote:
> Thank you so much!
> It's a great honor and pleasure to me :D
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:13 PM Munendra S N
> wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Namgyu!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Munendra S N
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:47 PM
Well, let me know if you have to dive into that and we can wrestle it to the
ground. I suppose the short answer is “that code is correct if I remember
correctly”….
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 8:22 PM, Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote:
>
> Thank Erick,
>
> I'm not fully understand it, but it kinda makes sense
Thank Erick,
I'm not fully understand it, but it kinda makes sense somehow.
Thank you!
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:40 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Dat:
>
> That’s a confusingly-named variable, surely needs a comment. Remembering
> from a long time ago trying to work with PreferredLeader, the
I have tagged some of the issues I have filed but not had bandwidth to tackle
immediately as ’newdev’, but could probably have done it far more often.
If all of us browse through the issues we have created and tag those we think
are simple and important, then there would suddenly be a bunch!
Thanks Erick!
I hope the remaining issues sort out quite soon.
For the release managers: As I did a more scripted, automatic migration using
the Jenkins REST API (otherwise the 50 jobs we have would have been a desaster
to migrate), I already have a plan to reuse that script to allow the
If nobody has expressed their _extreme_ gratitude to Uwe, infra (and helpers?)
for the migration, I hereby rectify that!!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 8/6/2020 10:52 AM, Sourav Saha wrote:
However, it is not really removing the duplicates from the results.
Kindly let me know if I am missing something. Any leads would be
appreciated.
Analysis does absolutely nothing to search results. It only affects the
indexed terms, which are not
Hi Team,
I am new to Apache Solr. I may be missing something obvious. I am trying to
remove the duplicates from the search results in Solr 8.6 and I am trying
to use solr.ShingleFilterFactory and solr.MinHashFilterFactory. Attaching
the snippet here,
Hi Hossman,
as you are doing the statistics on Jenkins, I just wanted to give you a
ping, because the build servers of ASF changed to Cloudbees. It's still
jenkins, but different structure.
I moved all jobs over yesterday, there are still some issue (a reboot is
required to enable a plugin
There may be other things, but off the top of my head, Streaming
expressions and TRA's are not available in "legacy"...
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:49 AM Cassandra Targett
wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2020, 10:22 AM -0500, Gus Heck , wrote:
>
> WRT the name "uncoordinated mode" I fear it could be read (or
Both "legacy" and "SolrCloud" clusters are search server clusters. Seen
from far enough, they look the same.
In "legacy" the management code is elsewhere (developed by the client
operating the cluster, running on other machines using a diferent logic and
potentially another DB than Zookeeper)
On Aug 6, 2020, 10:22 AM -0500, Gus Heck , wrote:
> WRT the name "uncoordinated mode" I fear it could be read (or even become
> known as) as "clumsy mode" which is humorous but possibly not what we're
> going for :)
I had also considered “non-coordinated”, and prefer it but couldn’t articulate
Just occurred to me: Maybe no adjective for the current zookeeper based
mode just "Solr" and the non-zookeeper (legacy/uncoordinated/clumsy) could
be Solr "Lite" which has a nice pun and very much fits with reduced
functionality with less infrastructure.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:22 AM Gus Heck
I've had a nearly identical experience to what Dave describes, I also chafe
under this restriction.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:07 AM David Smiley wrote:
> I sympathize with your pain, Roman.
>
> It appears we can't really do index-time multi-word synonyms because of
> the offset ordering rule.
WRT the name "uncoordinated mode" I fear it could be read (or even become
known as) as "clumsy mode" which is humorous but possibly not what we're
going for :) I'd perhaps suggest Cluster mode for SolrCloud though I'm not
entirely sure if Legacy Solr (in curren parlance) is not a "cluster"
too,
Thanks, Ishan. Just to be clear, I’m not planning on replacing “SolrCloud”
throughout at this time. I feel there are code changes that would need to
correspond to that, so it’s a larger effort IMO. The way I put it in the Jira
is:
“...Instead I'll augment the use of the word "SolrCloud" with
I sympathize with your pain, Roman.
It appears we can't really do index-time multi-word synonyms because of the
offset ordering rule. But it's not just synonyms, it's other forms of
multi-token expansion. Where I work, I've seen an interesting approach to
mixed language text analysis in which a
+1 Cassandra. These names are very appropriate. I'm glad we'll get rid of
"SolrCloud" name.
On Thu, 6 Aug, 2020, 7:57 pm Cassandra Targett,
wrote:
> The work in SOLR-14702 has left us with some awkward phrasing (which is
> still better than what it was) around non-SolrCloud clusters that I've
>
Yeah +1 for standardization +1.01 if it lands on *Test :) but that's just
my personal preference.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:17 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:54 PM Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>
>> This has amused/annoyed me for a long time. But did I ever have the
>>
> public CompletableFuture>
requestAsync(SolrRequest request);
NamedList aside, this looks like a great async API to me. But I
would still like some control over the thread pool/executor that's being
used.
Maybe that doesn't have to be part of the requestAysnc method signature,
maybe it could be
Hi Mike,
Yes, they are not zero offsets - I was instinctively avoiding
"negative offsets"; but they are indeed backward offsets.
Here is the token stream as produced by the analyzer chain indexing
"THE HUBBLE constant: a summary of the hubble space telescope program"
term=hubble pos=2 type=word
Congratulations Munendra! :D
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:16 PM Munendra S N wrote:
> Thank you all
>
> Regards,
> Munendra S N
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:45 PM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> Welcome Munendra!
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>>
Congratulations Gus! :D
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 7:31 PM Martin Gainty wrote:
> welcome gus!
>
> ~martin~
>
> --
> *From:* Michael McCandless
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 9:59 AM
> *To:* Lucene/Solr dev
> *Subject:* Re: Welcome Gus Heck to the PMC
>
> Welcome
Thank you so much!
It's a great honor and pleasure to me :D
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:13 PM Munendra S N wrote:
> Congratulations Namgyu!
>
> Regards,
> Munendra S N
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:47 PM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> Welcome Namgyu!
>>
>> Mike
The work in SOLR-14702 has left us with some awkward phrasing (which is
still better than what it was) around non-SolrCloud clusters that I've
offered to help fix.
I think we've struggled for years to find a good name for non-SolrCloud
clusters and we've used a number of variations: "legacy
+1
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:54 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> This has amused/annoyed me for a long time. But did I ever have the
> energy to tackle it? N.
>
> +1
>
> > On Aug 6, 2020, at 1:50 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:37 PM David
This has amused/annoyed me for a long time. But did I ever have the energy
to tackle it? N.
+1
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 1:50 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:37 PM David Smiley wrote:
> +1 to standardize on something.
> This has been brought
Dat:
That’s a confusingly-named variable, surely needs a comment. Remembering from a
long time ago trying to work with PreferredLeader, the problem is that you
can’t _replace_ the head because that’s the one that actually is the leader.
You have to spoof that by inserting a node that points to
welcome gus!
~martin~
From: Michael McCandless
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 9:59 AM
To: Lucene/Solr dev
Subject: Re: Welcome Gus Heck to the PMC
Welcome Gus!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:09 PM David Smiley
Hi guys,
When I look at these lines,
if(joinAtHead){
log.debug("Node {} trying to join election at the head", id);
List nodes =
OverseerTaskProcessor.getSortedElectionNodes(zkClient,
shardsElectZkPath);
if(nodes.size() <2){
leaderSeqPath = zkClient.create(shardsElectZkPath + "/" + id +
Hi Roman,
Hmm, this is all very tricky!
First off, why do you call this "zero offsets"? Isn't it "backwards
offsets" that your analysis chain is trying to produce?
Second, in your first example, if you output the tokens in the right order,
they would not violate the "offsets do not go
I tried to start looking at the newdev label a few months ago and pick a
couple of issues up. My feeling was that tagged issues were old and
typically of very little relevance - still David was very nice helping me
get my commits through (and I learned a huge lot).
I think having a newdev label
Thank you all
Regards,
Munendra S N
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:45 PM Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Welcome Munendra!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:09 PM David Smiley wrote:
>
>> Welcome Munendra!
>>
>> ~ David Smiley
>> Apache Lucene/Solr
Congratulations Namgyu!
Regards,
Munendra S N
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:47 PM Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Welcome Namgyu!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:08 PM David Smiley wrote:
>
>> Welcome Namgyu!
>>
>> ~ David Smiley
>> Apache
Congratulations Gus!
Regards,
Munendra S N
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:46 PM Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Welcome Gus!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:09 PM David Smiley wrote:
>
>> Welcome Gus!
>>
>> ~ David Smiley
>> Apache Lucene/Solr
40 matches
Mail list logo
