There may be other things, but off the top of my head, Streaming
expressions and TRA's are not available in "legacy"...

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:49 AM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Aug 6, 2020, 10:22 AM -0500, Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com>, wrote:
>
> WRT the name "uncoordinated mode" I fear it could be read (or even become
> known as) as "clumsy mode" which is humorous but possibly not what we're
> going for :)
>
>
> I had also considered “non-coordinated”, and prefer it but couldn’t
> articulate why. The association of “uncoordinated" with clumsiness might be
> what was bugging me.
>
>  I'd perhaps suggest Cluster mode for SolrCloud though I'm not entirely
> sure if Legacy Solr (in curren parlance) is not a "cluster" too, cluster
> being a somewhat vague term. However Clustered Mode and Legacy Mode seem
> more on target. I think "Legacy" could be changed since we're not really
> planning on abandoning it (are we?), but
>
>
> One can have a cluster and not run SolrCloud. I think from an operations
> perspective, several servers all running Solr is considered a cluster, no
> matter what tools are being used to get them to talk to each other.
>
> I think “Legacy” (also used today already in some contexts) is problematic
> because there aren’t plans to abandon it. Also “Legacy replication” is
> pretty close to exactly what PULL replicas use to poll leaders and pull new
> index segments when needed. IOW, it’s not “legacy”, it’s very actively
> being used in a growing number of clusters. That might be an implementation
> detail users aren’t aware of, but I feel the term is really lacking mostly
> in that it just doesn’t say anything besides “it’s older”.
>
> the adjective there SHOULD communicate reduced functionality because there
> are plenty of features that are cloud (cluster) only.
>
>
> In my view, the reduced functionality of non-SolrCloud clusters is mostly
> around coordination of requests, leader election, configs, and other
> similar automated activities one does manually otherwise. So, I feel that
> sort of proves my point - a word that conveys lack of coordination is a
> good option for what it’s called. If there is a better antonym for
> “coordinated”, I’m all for considering it but haven’t yet been able to
> think of/find one.
>
> I think it’s important to think about what differentiates the two ways of
> managing a Solr cluster and derive the naming from that. What features of
> SolrCloud don’t exist in the non-SolrCloud approach? What words help us
> generalize those gaps and can any of them be an appropriate name?
>
>
> -Gus
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:27 AM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> The work in SOLR-14702 has left us with some awkward phrasing (which is
> still better than what it was) around non-SolrCloud clusters that I've
> offered to help fix.
>
>
> I think we've struggled for years to find a good name for non-SolrCloud
> clusters and we've used a number of variations: "legacy replication" (which
> it isn't, since PULL replicas use the same thing), "Standalone mode" (which
> it isn't because it's a cluster), now "leader/follower mode" (which could
> be confusing because SolrCloud has leaders).
>
>
> Yesterday I thought about what really differentiates a SolrCloud cluster
> and a non-SolrCloud cluster and it occurred to me that a key difference is
> the former is coordinated by ZooKeeper, while the latter is not. That led
> me to think that perhaps "coordinated mode" can someday be a better
> replacement for the term "SolrCloud", while "uncoordinated mode" could be a
> replacement today for all these other non-SolrCloud mode variations.
>
>
> I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14716 and will
> create a branch for work in progress, but before I forge too far ahead, I
> want to draw attention to it first to give a chance for discussion so we're
> in agreement.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cassandra
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>
>

-- 
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)

Reply via email to