Hi Team,
I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for all
underlying licenses?
example : junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and MIT .
Please let me know if this is the aproriate group who should I send these
questions to..
Regards,
Vetrikkumaran Murugesan
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:41 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
> I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for
> all underlying licenses?
>
> example : junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and MIT .
>
>
>
> Please let me know i
Thanks Upayavira,
I was using apache solr 5.3.0.
2015-09-14 17:28 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk>:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:41 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
>
> I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for a
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:41 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>>
>> I see GPL and MIT license used in SOLR. So apache 2.0 holds good for
>> all underlying licenses?
>>
>> e
Thx Koji, i've added the License in r1340665, Stefan
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
I think we include d3.js in our Solr distribution, but I couldn't
find copyright notice of d3:
https://github.com/mbostock/d3/blob/master/LICENSE
Isn't it missing?
koji
--
I think we include d3.js in our Solr distribution, but I couldn't
find copyright notice of d3:
https://github.com/mbostock/d3/blob/master/LICENSE
Isn't it missing?
koji
--
Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
http://soleami.com/