Title: Message
Emmanuel,
Is it possible to
run multiple goals in sequence via maven-scm-plugin like the following
:
scm
connectionscm:mks:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]/connection
!--
eventually, I can wrap the connect comand after the above url's validation is
done, since there
Title: Message
Thanks
Dan,
I
think, what you have mentioned is command line option ? how to achieve
thisin pom.xml ?
Regards.
-Original Message-From: dan tran
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 12:18
PMTo: scm-dev@maven.apache.orgSubject: Re: How to
Hi,I have my own built-from-scratch version control system. I wish to now integrate this with Maven (like CVS, Subversion, etc).Could anyone please list down the things i need to do to be able to achieve this?
Thanks,Anirudh
Hi,
I got 3 binding +1 votes for this vote: Brett, Mike and mine. And one
non-binding +1 from Ernesto S. Tolentino Jr.
I think 3 +1 votes is the minimum. I'm planning to release the plugin
today. I've checked JIRA and the status is the same as when I called
the vote so I don't think I need to
Title: Message
could
you pleasemention this using a small example using xml constructs
?
Regards,
-Original Message-From: dan tran
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 12:33
PMTo: scm-dev@maven.apache.orgSubject: Re: How to run
multiple goals via
build
plugins
plugin
artifactIdmaven-scm-plugin/artifactId
goals
goalbootstrap/goal
goals
executions
execution
configuration goalsa,b,c,etc/goals
/configuration
/execution
/executions
/plugin
/plugins?
Btw, this question should go to user list.
Also, not sure why you want to
You can put any artifact as a dependency (whether it contains classes or
just plain text files doesn't matter ) and then you can get files from
it using the classloader Resource.
Marcin Maciukiewicz wrote:
Hello!
I'm working on Maven plugin for building project using 3rd party tools.
Hi!
My plugin is using my own packaging. I need to overwrite (not only
customize) clean behaviour. How to do this and still let users to
call only:
$ mvn clean
Regards.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I fixed everything I felt comfortable changing. There's a few more
issues with patches and it needs doc work and unit tests. I can do the
former but I still haven't figured out the plugin test stuff yet.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
I have to use the repository element in the maven-assembly-plugin's
assembly descriptor. Using this makes the assembly contains maven
metadata files under META-INF. (maven/.../*.pom and pom.propperties).
One solution Jesse and I talked about was to execute the assembly
plugin twice. The first
maven-dependency-plugin can prepare the staging area for you.
-D
On 6/26/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to use the repository element in the maven-assembly-plugin's
assembly descriptor. Using this makes the assembly contains maven
metadata files under META-INF.
Dan,
I cannot use the dependency-plugin because with it I cannot duplicate
the maven local repo structure in my assembly. The repository
element of the assembly's descriptor allows me to do that. However,
only the maven metadata info under META-INF/maven/* in the repo is
extraneous to me.
I tied the assembly goal to a phase. Problem resolved. Thanx for looking.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/26/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan,
I cannot use the dependency-plugin because with it I cannot duplicate
the maven local repo structure in my assembly. The repository
element of the
I am also interested on how to do this as well? any suggestion?
-Dan
On 6/26/06, Marcin Maciukiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
My plugin is using my own packaging. I need to overwrite (not only
customize) clean behaviour. How to do this and still let users to
call only:
$ mvn clean
ok,
let's go with that.
arnaud
On 6/24/06, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, in console-plugin-1.1, this is the same. I don't think it's worth
digging into that, as we would have to parse the error output (j:catch
only returns a String) ...
-Lukas
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
I
Hi all
I've had a look at the docck plugin and I like what I see so far! A
couple of questions that popped up along the way:
There is a check to make sure there is an index.[apt|xml|...] file
present. Shouldn't a lengthy description in the pom be good enough?
If a parameter is missing a
As far as I know, the docck plugin was just a prototype that I was
using to try to collect some basic information about the sate of
documentation in the plugins. I don't think much has happened to it
since then. I like all of your suggestions. It would be nice to
eventually go even further, and
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 24 Jun 06, at 6:25 PM 24 Jun 06, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
I want to be able to use the log instance returned from
Mojo.getLog() in a class that is used by Mojo. The class
Oh, I was under the impression that this was something that was going to
be used for the new and improved maven documentation.
By the way, epunzalan has made quite a lot of improvements to the plugin
since your first checkin.
--
Dennis Lundberg
John Casey wrote:
As far as I know, the docck
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 24 Jun 06, at 6:25 PM 24 Jun 06, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
I want to be able to use the log instance returned from
Mojo.getLog() in a class that is
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 24 Jun 06, at 6:25 PM 24 Jun 06, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
I want to be able to use the log instance returned from
yeah, I think the idea is definitely to build on this concept and use it for
documentation standards validation. I only meant to say that as of my first
edition, it was still pretty experimental.
:)
-j
On 6/26/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I was under the impression that
On 27/06/2006 8:48 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi all
I've had a look at the docck plugin and I like what I see so far! A
couple of questions that popped up along the way:
There is a check to make sure there is an index.[apt|xml|...] file
present. Shouldn't a lengthy description in the pom
Regarding the scm tag, only warnings are produced from them, as what
brett stated in his doc standard email.
Brett Porter wrote:
On 27/06/2006 8:48 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi all
I've had a look at the docck plugin and I like what I see so far! A
couple of questions that popped up
I have a plugin which resolves a specified artifact, expands it into a
work area within target and then runs a code generator against contents
within the expanded artifact.
{Specifically the resolved artifact contains an XML-Schema, and the tool
being executed is a csharp xsd tool (similar to
I thought there was already a model generated with modello in trunk?
Certainly a good idea to move these out of the code, though.
We're interested - just let us know what you propose before doing it :)
- Brett
On 26/06/2006 1:27 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Hey Guys,
Just looking over some of the
26 matches
Mail list logo
