git SCM JIRA questions

2009-03-17 Thread Mark Struberg
sorry topic missing... --- Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de schrieb am Di, 17.3.2009: Von: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Betreff: An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org Datum: Dienstag, 17. März 2009, 10:28 Olivier, I found a few git issues which are not assigned to the right component:

Re: accurev provider

2009-03-17 Thread Grant Gardner
I've created the jira with attached code. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-445 Will do the CLA when I find myself conveniently located near a fax or scanner. On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 05:02:15 +1100, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: 1) Create

Re:

2009-03-17 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I cannot assign this to you but I have assigned this to me. If you can provide patch I will be happy to commit them :-) Thanks, -- Olivier 2009/3/17 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Olivier, I found a few git issues which are not assigned to the right component:

Re: git SCM JIRA questions

2009-03-17 Thread Olivier Lamy
done but assigned to me as I can't assign to you. -- Olivier 2009/3/17 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: sorry topic missing... --- Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de schrieb am Di, 17.3.2009: Von: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Betreff: An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org Datum: Dienstag, 17.

Re : [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3

2009-03-17 Thread Julien HENRY
Works fine for me. Good job! - Message d'origine De : John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Envoyé le : Lundi, 16 Mars 2009, 17h51mn 16s Objet : [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3 Okay, It looks like the last known bugs are resolved for 2.1.0.

Re: svn commit: r755086 - in /maven/components/branches/maven-2.1.0-RC/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin: DefaultPluginManager.java MavenPluginValidator.java

2009-03-17 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi Brett, Author: brett Date: Tue Mar 17 02:28:26 2009 New Revision: 755086 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=755086view=rev Log: [MNG-4091] Validate the plugin descriptors and improve error reporting when mismatched with artifact Modified:

Re: svn commit: r755086 - in /maven/components/branches/maven-2.1.0-RC/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin: DefaultPluginManager.java MavenPluginValidator.java

2009-03-17 Thread Brett Porter
On 17/03/2009, at 9:10 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: For the sake of reduced heap consumption, how about unregistering the validator right after createChildContainer() returns such that the validator can be garbage collected? Imagine a plugin A which depends on another plugin artifact B,

RE: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3

2009-03-17 Thread Nord, James
I'm having issues with releasing (but this is not specific to 2.1.0-RC3 and is reproducible on 2.0.10). (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-406) but I am not sure if it is a fault in core or the release plug-in. Basically a forked maven process doesn't inherit env vars.

maven archetypes questions

2009-03-17 Thread Henri Gomez
I'm creating some in-house archectypes. I've got some questions : - I need to add extra parameters, ie -DappId and got it resolved in the generated pom.xml I do : mvn archetype:generate -DarchetypeGroupId=org.mycorp.archetypes -DarchetypeArtifactId=myapp -DarchetypeVersion=1.0-SNAPSHOT

Re: svn commit: r755086 - in /maven/components/branches/maven-2.1.0-RC/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin: DefaultPluginManager.java MavenPluginValidator.java

2009-03-17 Thread Brett Porter
I've made both these changes - thanks Benjamin! - Brett On 17/03/2009, at 9:20 PM, Brett Porter wrote: On 17/03/2009, at 9:10 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: For the sake of reduced heap consumption, how about unregistering the validator right after createChildContainer() returns such that

Transitive dependency management issue

2009-03-17 Thread Thomas HUGUERRE
Hello, It is the first time I use this mailing list, I just hope it is the right one. I am facing a transitive dependency management issue since yesterday. I have checked all the documentation on the Maven web site and found my answer

Re: Plugin incompatability between between 2.0.9 and 2.1

2009-03-17 Thread John Casey
nice catch. I looked at that plugin descriptor, but missed the different version...I was looking more for bad xml. -john Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Chris Handy wrote: I am having an issue where the inclusion of a plugin using maven 2.0.9 works fine but in maven 2.1.0-RC3 it complains saying

using JDK 1.5 generics in contributions ?

2009-03-17 Thread Anders Kristian Andersen
Hi Developers I would like to add some features to org.codehaus.plexus.util.FileUtils Can I write them using Generics ? /Anders - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: svn commit: r755199 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.1.0-RC/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/DefaultPluginManager.java

2009-03-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
Why are you changing core code in the RC branch after we have started the RC cycle? Can we please leave the code alone in RCs and use the 2.1.x branch for any non-regression related changes. On 17-Mar-09, at 4:39 AM, br...@apache.org wrote: Author: brett Date: Tue Mar 17 11:39:18 2009

Re: MavenXpp3Reader

2009-03-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16-Mar-09, at 5:06 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: Yeah, I got that, but will it be interpolated... No. The raw model. at present by using MXpp3 I can get the raw model. project.getOriginalModel() gives a kind-of interpolated without property evaluation project.getModel() gives the

Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Oleg Gusakov
I posted a short blog on the subject [http://tinyurl.com/c7m8qv], and in addition to that - I argue that LATEST and RELEASE are bad. What do you think? Extract: Let me first be clear about virtual versions as a whole: they are an excellent source of hard-to-find build

Re: svn commit: r755199 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.1.0-RC/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/DefaultPluginManager.java

2009-03-17 Thread Brett Porter
On 18/03/2009, at 2:23 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Why are you changing core code in the RC branch after we have started the RC cycle? Can we please leave the code alone in RCs and use the 2.1.x branch for any non-regression related changes. See the concurrent threads - the change you

Re: The Future of OSGi Maven

2009-03-17 Thread Georgy Bolyuba
There is a comment [1] by Igor on [2]: Henri, Tycho already discovers OSGi dependencies from bundle manifest. Does this mean that dependencies can be osgi-bundles? Where can one find more information about it? All I am able to find on Maven + OSGi is how to build osgi-bundle. Thank you,

Re: The Future of OSGi Maven

2009-03-17 Thread Henri Gomez
2009/3/17 Georgy Bolyuba boly...@gmail.com: There is a comment [1] by Igor on [2]:   Henri, Tycho already discovers OSGi dependencies from bundle manifest. Does this mean that dependencies can be osgi-bundles? Where can one find more information about it? All I am able to find on Maven +

RE: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Timothy Reilly
Hi Oleg, I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable. I do think there needs to be more thought around when they're allowed. No artifact's release pom should contain SNAPSHOT, LATEST or RELEASE anywhere. The later 2 should be

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Paul Gier
Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable. I do think there needs to be more thought around when they're allowed. No artifact's release pom should contain SNAPSHOT, LATEST or RELEASE anywhere.

RE: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3

2009-03-17 Thread Steve Ariantaj
Passed tests on our projects. -Original Message- From: John Casey [mailto:jdca...@commonjava.org] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 9:51 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3 Okay, It looks like the last known bugs are resolved for 2.1.0. So, let's take

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Michael McCallum
how often do you really change the enterprise pom though? On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:24:25 Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable. I do think there needs to be more thought around when

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Stephen Connolly
too often hence the itch that had me write versions-maven-plugin and the update-parent goal On 17/03/2009, Michael McCallum gho...@apache.org wrote: how often do you really change the enterprise pom though? On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:24:25 Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a

RE: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Jörg Schaible
Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable. I do think there needs to be more thought around when they're allowed. No artifact's release pom should contain SNAPSHOT, LATEST or RELEASE

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3

2009-03-17 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
It seems that we aren't checking for Java version used to launch maven (=1.5).I made the error to try to launch a build with the RC3 and Java 1.4 and received a method not found error. I quickly found my error but i'm not sure everyone will think about this. Perhaps it could save us time of users'

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3

2009-03-17 Thread John Casey
Funny...I've been building these RC's using JDK 1.4 and Maven 2.0.10 (except RC1, which used 2.1.0-M1, IIRC)...I'll see whether I can reproduce the error. Do you have any idea where your error came from? -john Arnaud HERITIER wrote: It seems that we aren't checking for Java version used to

Re: release of maven-eclipse-plugin 2.6 ?

2009-03-17 Thread Barrie Treloar
How is this coming along? I think I am getting some more free time in the coming weeks to help if needed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3

2009-03-17 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I tried to build the archetype sub project with jdk 1.4 / 2.1.0 RC3I can try to reproduce it. It seems its because I didn't have some SNAPSHOT dependencies in my local repo. On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:30 PM, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote: Funny...I've been building these RC's using

Re: The Future of OSGi Maven

2009-03-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 17-Mar-09, at 10:13 AM, Georgy Bolyuba wrote: There is a comment [1] by Igor on [2]: Henri, Tycho already discovers OSGi dependencies from bundle manifest. Does this mean that dependencies can be osgi-bundles? Where can one find more information about it? All I am able to find on Maven

Re: The Future of OSGi Maven

2009-03-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 17-Mar-09, at 10:17 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: 2009/3/17 Georgy Bolyuba boly...@gmail.com: There is a comment [1] by Igor on [2]: Henri, Tycho already discovers OSGi dependencies from bundle manifest. Does this mean that dependencies can be osgi-bundles? Where can one find more

Current status of moving apache projects to apache's nexus instance?

2009-03-17 Thread David Jencks
I'm trying to help the apache portals project set up some root poms. They are currently using the apache pom version 5 which IIUC deploys releases and snapshots to the apache nexus instance. I googled but couldn't find any instructions on how to proceed with this. I think it would be

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3

2009-03-17 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I reproduced it.The problem seems to be in jetty. To reproduce : An empty local repo, JDK 1.4, maven 2.1.0-RC3 In archetype/pom.xml you change the maven-parent version to 11 (instead of 11-SNAPSHOT). You launch a build When you'll execute tests in Building Maven Archetype Common you'll have a

Re: svn commit: r755199 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.1.0-RC/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/DefaultPluginManager.java

2009-03-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 17-Mar-09, at 10:10 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 18/03/2009, at 2:23 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Why are you changing core code in the RC branch after we have started the RC cycle? Can we please leave the code alone in RCs and use the 2.1.x branch for any non-regression related changes.

Re: release of maven-eclipse-plugin 2.6 ?

2009-03-17 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
if the release wasn't done, you'll make many users happy doing it Arnaud On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote: How is this coming along? I think I am getting some more free time in the coming weeks to help if needed.

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Stephen Connolly
too often hence the itch that had me write versions-maven-plugin and the update-parent goal On 17/03/2009, Michael McCallum gho...@apache.org wrote: how often do you really change the enterprise pom though? On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:24:25 Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Oleg Gusakov
� wrote: Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable. I do think there needs to be more thought around when they're allowed. No artifact's release pom should contain SNAPSHOT, LATEST or

Re: svn commit: r755199 - /maven/components/branches/maven-2.1.0-RC/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/DefaultPluginManager.java

2009-03-17 Thread Brett Porter
On 18/03/2009, at 9:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 17-Mar-09, at 10:10 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 18/03/2009, at 2:23 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Why are you changing core code in the RC branch after we have started the RC cycle? Can we please leave the code alone in RCs and use the

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC3

2009-03-17 Thread Brett Porter
Seems like this would fail on earlier versions as well? On 18/03/2009, at 9:50 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: I reproduced it.The problem seems to be in jetty. To reproduce : An empty local repo, JDK 1.4, maven 2.1.0-RC3 In archetype/pom.xml you change the maven-parent version to 11 (instead