+1 Non Binding.
On 18/08/2011, at 9:23 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
[+1] I'm in favor to use as Maven core dependencies SISU and AETHER libraries
published under EPL 1.0 License and released under eclipse.org governance
Please - for the love of ANY Maven user - please do NOT roll a 3.0.4 with any
Aether thats NOT 1.12.
1.11 that ships with the current Maven 3.0.3 has fundamental issues with your
local repository has artifacts from both mirrors and non-mirrors. I'm finding
more and more users getting hit with
Sorry Mark, exactly this solution has explicitly been vetoed with the vast
majority of -1 because of various other reasons.
If we release 3.0.4 now, a user might still update his local maven installation
to 1.12 easily. So I see no downside to the current status quo.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On
Only that the majority of users will get just get unable to resolve artifact
errors, and probably never know that they can update aether - which, whilst it
isn't a difficult thing to do is just a bit fiddly - instead they'll just get
frustrated that once again maven black magic sucks.
If
lø., 20.08.2011 kl. 09.50 +0930, skrev Barrie Treloar:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
[del]
After some time with git you just start using branches for anything you
feel like, and imposing that kind of constraint now seems strange. So
3/4 weeks ago we should/may have done a release of 3.0.4 with existing
Aether/Sisu dependencies (thus yes existing ones are from Sonatype but are
dual licensed ASL/EPL - or maybe full ASL I don't remember).
Arnaud
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote:
Arnaud,
+1
2011/8/18 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
The main intention of this release is to get java7 file attribute api's
in use, which can be a great performance improvment for java7 mac
linux users. There should also be some improvement for 1.5/1.6 users,
and this release
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 8/20/11, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
From: Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Jar Plugin version 2.3.2 and maven-archiver
version 2.4.2
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Date: Saturday, August 20, 2011, 8:48
+1
-Robert
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:56:08 +0100
From: strub...@yahoo.de
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Jar Plugin version 2.3.2 and maven-archiver
version 2.4.2
To: dev@maven.apache.org
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 8/20/11, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
From:
+1
Hervé
Le jeudi 18 août 2011, Kristian Rosenvold a écrit :
Hi,
The main intention of this release is to get java7 file attribute api's
in use, which can be a great performance improvment for java7 mac
linux users. There should also be some improvement for 1.5/1.6 users,
and this
+1
On 18 August 2011 16:05, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The main intention of this release is to get java7 file attribute api's
in use, which can be a great performance improvment for java7 mac
linux users. There should also be some improvement for 1.5/1.6
When I was puttering in JXR, Hervé mentioned that Vincent had a load
of stuff in a branch. Now that the new parent POMs are out, I'd like
to update JXR to use them, and make the plugin 'parent' to the general
plugin parent. Vincent, do you want to merge in your branch, first?
12 matches
Mail list logo
