Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017, 23:47:54 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit : > I think the conclusion is: 3.5.1 is not correct > > it should either be: > 3.5.2 without the 2 classloader related issues. ideally with an option to activate the classloader changes (for people knowing what they are doing or

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #167: Speedup Standard Output if Tests

Github user DaGeRe commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167 I adjusted the current commit and PR to code style, could you re-review this one? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

I think the conclusion is: 3.5.1 is not correct it should either be: 3.5.2 without the 2 classloader related issues. or 3.6.0 including the classloader related issues, but probably improved with a system property to switch back to the 3.5.0-behavior. We also need to improve ITs and

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #167: Speedup Standard Output if Tests

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167 Pls do it in a new PR. Here is link for Eclipse/Idea code style xml https://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/code.html On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Tibor Digana

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #167: Speedup Standard Output if Tests

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167 You completely changed code style. Please use ASF Maven code style because here I do not see relevant changes. On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM, DaGeRe

Re: Allow custom updatePolicy

If we did that, then wouldn't the build get really slow every time you hit that 5 minute expiration? On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:49 AM Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > I just wanted to get thoughts on a possible new feature. Right now, my > > company has thousands of Maven modules

Re: Jenkins and Maven 3.0.5 or JDK 7

I agree with Mark about the rule to split: 1 repo = 1 lifecycle But like we said with the number of repo and the flat organisation in infra side it won't be easy :( About sub-modules or sub-trees I never used them myself but I always had various bad feedbacks. About dependencies cycles ... yeah

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #167: Speedup Standard Output if Tests

GitHub user DaGeRe opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/167 Speedup Standard Output if Tests Currently, surefire creates a new byte array with size of the input *3 for saving the unescaped input. This made surefire way slower than running a test

Re: Allow custom updatePolicy

> I just wanted to get thoughts on a possible new feature. Right now, my > company has thousands of Maven modules that are all on snapshots with an > updatePolicy of "always" (basically everyone gets the latest build of > everything, kind of like a poor man's monorepo). Why "always" then and not

Allow custom updatePolicy

I just wanted to get thoughts on a possible new feature. Right now, my company has thousands of Maven modules that are all on snapshots with an updatePolicy of "always" (basically everyone gets the latest build of everything, kind of like a poor man's monorepo). This mostly works fine, but one of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

I’d really like if somebody could draft the release notes for the two different classloader changes. It will make it easier to decide whether to roll with this or bump minor with (if I recall correctly) the corresponding drop of Java 7 per our policy on JVMs with minor version bump On Wed 11 Oct

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

+1 eventually adding a flag or system property to activate the new behaviour this remembers me of the idea regarding flags to support new beta features Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017, 08:13:13 CEST Anders Hammar a écrit : > I'm feeling stronger and stronger about not having this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

I'm feeling stronger and stronger about not having this change in a bugfix release. Why not go for v3.6.0 if we decide that the class loading change is the way to go? And keep bugfix releases for just bugfixes. /Anders On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: