[Fwd: M2Eclipse]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tried the user list with no response, so I figured I'd go the dev route. Is there any place to get this outside of codehaus? Or a specific URL at codehaus to use (as it was noted that project specific URLs will work when the main URLs won't)?

Re: [vote] Jesse McConnell as a Maven Plugins committer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I think we all agree we need more keen people helping out with plugins! Jesse has been contributing on the users list and mojo project for some time, and has recently contributed several patches to the Apache Maven

Re: [vote] Maria Odea (Deng) Ching as a Maven Plugins and Repository Manager committer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Like John, Deng has been helping out on the users list, plugins and the repository manager for some time. I'd like to propose we give her commit access. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Brett

Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (third RC)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 (non-binding) John Casey wrote: Hi again, I wanted to let everyone know that we've got the latest round of regressions fixed, including: * Fabrizio's lingering path problems from MNG-2006 * MNG-2136 * MNG-2124 * MNG-2130 These fixes

Re: Making the current web site suck less

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All in all, I'd have to agree with the sentiments of this. I don't think anything should be taken personally although I know some personalities might be inclined to react emotionally at the words used, but if you look at the sentiment I believe it's

Re: Making the current web site suck less

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Kuhnert wrote: I think what everyone is saying sounds more or less correct, but what is the solution then? If they can't rely on a runtime container to host the site, options become MUCH more limited. Complaints about the UI are fine

Re: Making the current web site suck less

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It uses anakia to transform, but in true Maven spirit it should be able to be done - with a plugin. ;-) And maybe maven-site is suited to it just fine (not a maven-site expert for user sites AT ALL - I'm with Jesse here that so much more 'whiz-bang'

[jira] Created: (MPIR-33) ScmReport doesn't accept non-artifactId URLs

ScmReport doesn't accept non-artifactId URLs Key: MPIR-33 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-33 Project: Maven 2.x Project Info Reports Plugin Type: Bug Versions: 2.0-beta-3 Reporter: Brian K. Wallace

[jira] Updated: (MNG-2129) generated source repo page is misleading when added to the general site.

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2129?page=all ] Brian K. Wallace updated MNG-2129: -- Attachment: MNG-2129-maven-site.patch generated source repo page is misleading when added to the general site

[jira] Commented: (MPIR-33) ScmReport doesn't accept non-artifactId URLs

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-33?page=comments#action_60395 ] Brian K. Wallace commented on MPIR-33: -- I believe I have inaccurately reported this issue. The issue appears to be more with documentation of how/why rather than functional

Re: Making the current web site suck less

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wendy Smoak wrote: On 3/7/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * I'm still a little torn on where plugin docs go. No hurry on this, but something to ponder. We definitely need to make the references for those integrate better. Site/skin

Re: Making the current web site suck less

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wendy Smoak wrote: On 3/7/06, Brian K. Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While I agree that it would be nice to have the 'latest and greatest' docs on the main site, I don't believe having them as the only documentation is a good idea at all

Re: [jira] Closed: (MPA-50) create new Maven dev lists

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brett Porter (JIRA) wrote: [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPA-50?page=all ] Brett Porter closed MPA-50: --- Resolution: Fixed create new Maven dev lists -- Key:

[jira] Commented: (MNG-808) Maven 2 Website Information

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-808?page=comments#action_60298 ] Brian K. Wallace commented on MNG-808: -- Aside from the Why Choose/Use Maven, is there really a need for the Why XXX sections? I view Why perform Unit Testing or Why use CI as issues