Hi
Rat now has a variety of components built using a variety of tools in
a variety of languages.We're looking to move to Apache CMS at the
project level, integrating Maven site builds into subversion. The
extension mechanism plugging subversion into wagon scm seems to be a
little buggy. Easier to
Hi Everyone :-)
Over in Rat-land[1] we've started working on Whisker, a tool to assist
assembled applications[2] with licensing wrangling based on a
licensing descriptor. As well as generating LICENSE, NOTICE (and - one
day - other licensing related materials), Whisker aims to validate
that each
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote:
Hey all,
I was thinking again the other day about how mixins could be introduced to
maven to improve/fix some of the issues found with the rigid parent/child
lineage of poms.
Maintaining common meta-data without mixin's is
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
go for it
+1
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
2011/7/11 Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com:
Hi Robert,
There is a problem of sync (I think) between xircles and Jira.
I just added you manually in maven-developers group in Jira and I opened
an issue on codehaus side (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2099)
I'm happy to use
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Wendy Smoak wsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new
vote, since this one is formally closed?
The 72 hour waiting time is a
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Kasun Gajasinghe kasu...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
snip
After many problems, I've now opted to uninstall the official Maven
and Ant packages (and Eclipse...), and use instead a set of scripts
which
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Sunday, July 03, 2011 7:19:36 PM Benson Margulies wrote:
So, I'm a mostly a monkey here, but it seems very sensible to me.
Perhaps Dan Kulp would chime in?
It sounds reasonable to me. I know I copied one of the
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
look, what you are trying to do is move an object of infinite mass, keeping
the lever length and force applied finite. good luck, it will be fun for us
watching from the sidelines... fundamentally maven is
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem I reported with svn was local to my checkout; my checkin
had succeeded.
I've applied all the patches with tests, and even written tests for
two without tests. I've invited two others to provide tests,
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
The problem I reported with svn was local to my checkout; my checkin
had succeeded.
I've applied all the patches
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working now on an integration test for
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-94
Done
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
A number of feature requests [1][2] could be implemented in an elegant
way by introducing an interface (ResourceMerger, say) similar to
ResourceTransformer. I'm happy to dive in and provide integration and
unit tests for this change, plus implementations for the requested
features if the consensus
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll play patch monkey. Name those JIRA.
:-)
[1] patches the documentation to add descriptions for the resource
descriptors which worked well for me. Moving on to prepare test cases
and fixes for issues discovered.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think the shade plugin does something like this.
Looks like it does...
Thanks :-)
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think the shade plugin does something like this.
Thanks
I've taken a look and this seems the right place to start but I'll
probably need to do some development...
There are 21 open issues [1] and (by my count) 8
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
The JIRA count is not a reliable indication of anything. Lots of us
use shade in production. The JIRA count can indicate a plethora of
improvement suggestions, or a bunch of uninvestigated complaints.
Don't get me
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
The JIRA count is not a reliable indication of anything. Lots of us
use shade in production. The JIRA count can indicate a plethora of
improvement suggestions, or a bunch of uninvestigated complaints.
True. That's
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think the shade plugin does something like this.
Looks like it does...
I've submitted [1] a documentation patch to help
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:47 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
If you can mange to get some patches applied and a release of the
shade plugin done that would be fantastic. MSHADE-88 for me and I've
another fix to different scoped dependencies which i can submit if
theres a
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll play patch monkey. Name those JIRA.
:-)
I've submitted a documentation patch [1] to let users know it exists.
I'm out of typing time now but I'll step up with some more later
today.
Robert
[1]
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
snip
I'm looking for smart merger of NOTICEs and LICENSEs. How is this
currently implemented?
For the NOTICE stuff, you can look at the
org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.resource.ApacheNoticeResourceTransformer
which several
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
The legal risk involved in downloading and using a jar of code pushed
to central under false pretenses is very small.
I live in the UK. That's now untrue here.
Robert
(Apoligies for allowing this to drifting off topic after I failed to
make my main point)
IMHO bait-and-switch licensing isn't something to panic about today
but better license management is something that Maven should think
about enabling. This would offer users protection from similar tactics
in
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
snip
None of this discussion is really relevant for this list... except maybe that
pointing to a URL for a license in the POM is not a good idea.
This is really what I wanted to raise here (just a bit difficult
without
(This is continuation of a thread from 2008[1]. It's now impacting the
release of Apache James 3. If the topic is too far OT please shout ;-)
The JSW artifacts in Maven Central [2] now seem to lack a public
license (in other words, a unilateral license allowing the public to
distribute and
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no such thing as a 'retroactive license change', though
perhaps the Tanuki-person has managed a sufficient approximation. Is
there?
IMO enough of a sufficient approximation to worry :-/
(more detail in
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
just an idea: what about extending the maven-release-plugin to ask for a
license if the pom doesn't contain a license section?
In principle, this would be a good feature to add to a verification
tool like Rat.
In this
Hi
I'm taking a look at adding summary reporting to a plugin [1],
targeting maven 3. the plugin loads classes to introspect them, using
getCompileClasspathElements() from the project. This works ok in
non-aggregate mode and when the aggregate goal is called directly but
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
Ok, we'll cancel the oss.sonatype.org request, unless you still want
us to host the repo for you. I left a comment on the upload request,
we need the artifacts to be signed, everything else looks good.
cool
more generally,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Brian Foxbri...@infinity.nu wrote:
If someone is interested in maintaining the poms and tracking their
releases, we can set up a repository at oss.sonatype.org.
a lot of apache projects rely on bouncy castle releases for crypto.
i'd be willing to help maintain an
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Brian Foxbri...@infinity.nu wrote:
ok create a new project issue here:
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH and those interested in maintaining
it can add a comment to the issue to get privs.
please take a quick look at
just a heads up that maven may need to switch from SHA1 to SHA512 (or
higher). not sure how difficult that will be.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
For artifact checksums? They are not a security measure, so I don't think
increasing their length is of benefit.
Having read the same mail I'm guessing you did, it made me reflect and we
probably should have kept using md5
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Paul Gier pg...@redhat.com wrote:
Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi!
I thought in a similar direction. I think we can even let the maven-scm as
it is.
The problematic usecase is if we have a multi-module build and like to
release only one of the sub modules.
John
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com wrote:
On 24-Apr-09, at 7:36 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Is sounds like the process used by our release plugin doesn't really
match
the way git works, so maybe we can change the way the release plugin
works
instead
On 4/24/09, Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com wrote:
On 24-Apr-09, at 7:55 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jason van Zyl
jvan...@sonatype.com wrote:
On 24-Apr-09, at 7:36 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Is sounds like the process used by our release
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1 for moving to git.
Jukka already mirrors a lot of projets on GitHub and there is already a
git.apache.org domain too (not sure where this leads too).
Jason is already convinced, but for all other sceptics:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok I understand. The problem is for commercial products based on Eclipse. I
forgot that.For plexus it's annoying but it mustn't be to difficult to
solve. The number of committers is limited and the major part is in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jason's recently posted
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200902.mbox/%3cea7c752b-2f67-4329-b0c5-35ccff853...@sonatype.com%3e)
a warning about tightening up release verification. i think that this
is generally a good thing. i
On 8/6/08, Brian Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said before, this was done by infra with no notice to us. The new
policy of purging is theirs, not ours. See the infra archives if you
would like to read about it.
It would be perfectly possible to publish long lived Milestones
provided they
On 7/23/08, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/07/2008, at 4:23 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I've wanted to pick up my work on this for some time and was
prodded by the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] threads
On 7/23/08, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22-Jul-08, at 8:55 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 23/07/2008, at 4:23 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I've wanted to pick up my work on this for some time
On 7/23/08, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22-Jul-08, at 8:55 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 23/07/2008, at 4:23 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I've wanted to pick up my work on this for some time
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've wanted to pick up my work on this for some time and was prodded by the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] threads to take another crack at this.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Repository+Security (the issue and
related
On 6/14/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Jun 07, at 9:39 AM 14 Jun 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
that's what I understood too, source release is mandatory and
binary optional
This is a throwback to HTTPD where a source distribution made more
sense because of platform issues.
On 5/6/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 06 May 2007 14:10, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I strongly encourage Maven experts to chime in and make their
opinions known.
I already did the last time we had a vote. What was the result of
that vote and where is there another poll?
On 5/6/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6 May 07, at 9:30 AM 6 May 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Just FYI:
There's another thread going on on the general incubator list about
where
incubating maven artifacts should go:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/
On 3/13/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Who here will be at ApacheCon in May? I know Jason is as he is
speaking. Anyone want to get together there?
i'll be there over the queens day weekend as well as the conference
- robert
On 1/11/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Jan 07, at 3:42 PM 11 Jan 07, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
hi john
You can now generate release reports using the maven-swizzle-plugin.
have you implemented your
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
hi john
You can now generate release reports using the maven-swizzle-plugin.
have you implemented your header checked yet?
i'm interested in collaborating on release auditing (in particular for apache)
- robert
On 1/11/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Jan 07, at 3:42 PM 11 Jan 07, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
hi john
You can now generate release reports using the maven-swizzle-plugin.
have you implemented your
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not yet. Still looking for existing maven plugins that might be doing
this already. Not sure if the verifier plugin could do this for us.
there's quite a few wrinkles to release auditing which aren't
immediately obvious
RAT code's rubbish (i
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was thinking of integrating both docck and rat plugins by calling
their execute() methods.
Docck throws a MojoFailureException when documentation tests fails and
test results could be redirected to a file through the output
parameter. So
On 1/11/07, John Tolentino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
Can you have a plexus component for the license header auditing then?
i think so but we may need to think about the best way to do it...
RAT's half way through a redesign ATM but i'll move that onto a branch :-/
I can hook it
On 12/22/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 19 Dec 06, at 12:28 PM 19 Dec 06, Steve Loughran wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Just checking in with folks to see if anyone is planning
On 12/21/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12/20/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL
On 12/20/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
2. looking to get management approval to hand the code to the MIT
On 12/20/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just some holiday fun ahead...
On 12/20/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are
1. planning an apache con EU talk, fear the repository police.
in suitable costumes, i hope ;-)
nothing planned, but if we have someone in
On 12/20/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 19 Dec 06, at 12:28 PM 19 Dec 06, Steve Loughran wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Just checking in with folks to see if anyone is planning ApacheCon
talks.
1. fear the repository police. We will pick people in
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'd like to see POM auditing in there somewhere.
+1
henri's been talking about adding this to RAT. IMHO this should be
implemented as a separate component so that it could be used by a
variety of applications: for example, it might
On 12/19/06, John Tolentino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Been working on a tool to generate reports for release candidates and
this is a mock of what it should look like:
http://people.apache.org/~jtolentino/release-reports/MockReport.html
We can send this generated page to the dev
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'd like to see POM auditing in there somewhere.
+1
henri's been talking about adding this to RAT. IMHO this should be
implemented as a separate
Burrell Donkin
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAR-7?rc=1 commented out code to set the
Specification-Version manifect attribute. There seems to have been quite a bit
of debate about that bug. The result seems to be that the code was commented
out
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/maven-1
Burrell Donkin
It would be very useful to be able to specify which plugins (and versions) are
required by the build. Apache projects are starting to specify these
dependencies in the standard project dependency section. This is bad in the
long run since it leads to Maven reporting inaccurate
maven-classic.css obscures external linked URLs on MSIE
---
Key: MAVEN-1682
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1682
Project: Maven
Type: Bug
Environment: MSIE on windows
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
[PATCH] typo
Key: MAVEN-1614
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1614
Project: maven
Type: Improvement
Components: documentation
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
Priority: Trivial
Attachments: maven-typo
Typo in using/index
[PATCH] two plugin related FAQs
---
Key: MAVEN-1613
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1613
Project: maven
Type: Improvement
Components: documentation
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
Priority: Trivial
Attachments
[PATCH] release documentation
--
Key: MAVEN-1611
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1611
Project: maven
Type: Improvement
Components: documentation
Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin
Priority: Trivial
Attachments
On 6 Apr 2004, at 23:37, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 16:54, robert burrell donkin wrote:
IIRC the plan was to phase out betwixt but i see there's still a
dependency in the build and some references in the code. is betwixt
going to be used for the upcoming release (and if so, where
IIRC the plan was to phase out betwixt but i see there's still a
dependency in the build and some references in the code. is betwixt
going to be used for the upcoming release (and if so, where)?
(i've made quite a lot of progress on betwixt over the last few months
and can probably look at
71 matches
Mail list logo
