Here my +1.
2012/5/21 Olivier Lamy :
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6.
> We fixed 16 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 )
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-104/
>
> Staging site: http://maven.apache.org
+1 (binding)
On 21 May 2012 14:51, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6.
> We fixed 16 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 )
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-104/
>
> Staging site: http
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Anders Hammar
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 11:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Invoker Plugin 1.6 (take 3)
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks Olivier!
>
> /Ande
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Olivier!
/Anders
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:16 PM, LeClaire Garvin
wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Garvin LeClaire
> garvin.lecla...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On May 21, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6
+1 non-binding
Regards,
Garvin LeClaire
garvin.lecla...@gmail.com
On May 21, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6.
We fixed 16 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 )
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org
Thanks for the polished ping :-)
I will take care of that this week.
2012/5/21 Anders Hammar :
> I'd appreciate spinning a release of this. When staged I can test on
> my real corporate use cases. Should be very similar to my test on the
> snapshot though, so I don't expect any issues.
>
> /Anders
I'd appreciate spinning a release of this. When staged I can test on
my real corporate use cases. Should be very similar to my test on the
snapshot though, so I don't expect any issues.
/Anders
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> It's not that easy. The corporate infrastructur
It's not that easy. The corporate infrastructure only proxies central,
not any snapshot repos. So I can't test a Snapshot version.
So what I've done is verifying that the plugin now works with the new
embedded Maven 3 feature of Hudson. Really my main goal and should be
what I need for the corpora
Hi,
AFAIK no rush :-)
So take the time to test your various use cases.
2012/5/2 Anders Hammar :
>> If no settings specified, the maven invocation will use the default
>> one (~/.m2/settings.xml)
>
> Actually it will use the settings of the calling process, which could
> be something different than
> If no settings specified, the maven invocation will use the default
> one (~/.m2/settings.xml)
Actually it will use the settings of the calling process, which could
be something different than the default file-based one.
Due to corporate infrastructure reasons I couldn't test one of my
actual u
2012/4/29 Anders Hammar :
> Yes, I will. Will not happen until Wednesday though. (Holidays here in
> Sweden.)
>
> Regarding the flag, inheriting setitngs.xml by default from the
> invoking process if no settings.xml is specified in the flugin config
> is not implemented? I'm asking based on mine a
Yes, I will. Will not happen until Wednesday though. (Holidays here in Sweden.)
Regarding the flag, inheriting setitngs.xml by default from the
invoking process if no settings.xml is specified in the flugin config
is not implemented? I'm asking based on mine and Stephen's discussion.
/Anders
On
On 26 April 2012 23:18, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>
> On 26 April 2012 23:13, Robert Scholte wrote:
>
>> Op Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:57:14 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly <
>> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.**com >:
>>
>>
>> On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Hammar wrote:
>>>
>>> > I would argue that thos
On 26 April 2012 23:13, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Op Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:57:14 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.**com >:
>
>
> On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Hammar wrote:
>>
>> > I would argue that those are broken projects. You should pretty much
>>> always
>>> >
Op Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:57:14 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly
:
On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Hammar wrote:
> I would argue that those are broken projects. You should pretty much
always
> use mrm if you are using invoker for testing a maven plugin. There are
> cases where you might use invok
ok in order to try make all happy :-) I will make that configurable.
@Anders I have pushed a snapshot with a new flag called
mergeUserSettings. Can you try with your use case ?
2012/4/26 Stephen Connolly :
> On 26 April 2012 13:57, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>
>> On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Ham
On 26 April 2012 13:57, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Hammar wrote:
>
>> > I would argue that those are broken projects. You should pretty much
>> always
>> > use mrm if you are using invoker for testing a maven plugin. There are
>> > cases where you might use invoker f
On 26 April 2012 13:40, Anders Hammar wrote:
> > I would argue that those are broken projects. You should pretty much
> always
> > use mrm if you are using invoker for testing a maven plugin. There are
> > cases where you might use invoker for something else, in which case you
> > should not be s
> I would argue that those are broken projects. You should pretty much always
> use mrm if you are using invoker for testing a maven plugin. There are
> cases where you might use invoker for something else, in which case you
> should not be specifying a custom settings.xml.
I might be wrong, but t
On 26 April 2012 12:01, Anders Hammar wrote:
> The problem I have with using the mrm-maven-plugin is that it would
> then require the pom to be updated.
>
> Here's a scenario:
> In an environment with no direct access to central but an internal MRM
> is used, which is configured in settings.xml.
The problem I have with using the mrm-maven-plugin is that it would
then require the pom to be updated.
Here's a scenario:
In an environment with no direct access to central but an internal MRM
is used, which is configured in settings.xml. I download some open
source project that uses the m-invoke
So vote cancelled again :-).
I will make this merge optional (off by default).
2012/4/26 Stephen Connolly :
> I actually think the merge feature is a step backwards and I am toying with
> being -1 on the commit.
>
> for proxies I think mrm-maven-plugin @ mojo is the way to go.
>
> invoker is a dif
I actually think the merge feature is a step backwards and I am toying with
being -1 on the commit.
for proxies I think mrm-maven-plugin @ mojo is the way to go.
invoker is a different use case from release, so passing through the
settings is, in general, a bad thing. If you make the merge an opt
Good catch on the warning for activated profiles.
They are activated in the maven build so the invoker plugin merge
those setting with those eventually defined in the mojo configuration
field ( ).
What I can do is made this merge feature optional (off by default and
add a debug flag to display it f
The buildjob is used to store the results of the invoked runs.
That page describes the schema.
Iirc I was to write a Jenkins plugin to parse them so that you could track
the invoked tests in the trend graph... But I do get pulled every which way
and it can take a while before I return to these th
I'm interested to know the content of those build.log files.
Note using parallel feature, you will need some resources on the
machine running build because if you have a MAVEN_OPTS with a huge
mx/ms this will be multiplicated by the number of parallel thread you
are configuring.
This parallelThread
Hi,
just an other question came to my mind
What is the purpose of the
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin-1.6/build-job.html
It's given as a link in the docs? But i can't find an explanation which
intention it has ? May be i oversight it simply ?
Can someone enlighten me?
Hi,
i have a question concerning the parameters which given to instances of
the invoker-plugin on command during execution of the integration test:
Based on the files i've taken a look into it looks like there is a
profile activated or added on default so far as i understand this is
based on
Hi,
-1 (non binding) based on my reported problems...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
--
SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung SchulungTel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893
Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz MarbaiseICQ#: 135949029
Hauptstrasse 177 USt.IdNr: DE191347579
52146 Würselen
Hi Oliver,
sorry for late answer ...but here is the result with settings
parallelThreads to 5...
[INFO] Installing
/home/build/wc/appassembler/appassembler-maven-plugin/pom.xml to
/home/build/wc/appassembler/appassembler-maven-plugin/target/local-repo/org/codehaus/mojo/appassembler-maven-plu
+1 (non-binding)
/Anders
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:53, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6.
> We fixed 14 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 )
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-097/
Thanks Lukas for the fix.
I have fixed too the parallelThreads trouble. @Karl can you test with
your projects ?
Thanks
2012/4/24 Lukas Theussl :
>
> See
> http://maven.apache.org/doxia/issues/index.html#Verbatim_blocks_not_boxed
>
> I have fixed the apt sources.
>
> Cheers,
> -Lukas
>
>
>
>
> Karl
See
http://maven.apache.org/doxia/issues/index.html#Verbatim_blocks_not_boxed
I have fixed the apt sources.
Cheers,
-Lukas
Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
i have checked the staged Site and observed that the frames around the
source examples or code snippet are not there...
For example if
HI,
I have added simply
3
Of course this should be
written: parallelThreads...
Just a typo...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
--
SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung SchulungTel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893
Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz MarbaiseICQ#: 135949029
Hauptstrasse 177
Hi,
i have checked the staged Site and observed that the frames around the
source examples or code snippet are not there...
For example if you compare
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin-1.6/examples/invoker-properties.html
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin/
Hi,
just tested an other project
(https://github.com/khmarbaise/Maven-License-Verifier-Plugin)
I have added simply
3
to my configuration for the invoker-plugin plus of course the version to
1.6...
with the following result:
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-invoker-plugin:1.6:run (integration-test) @
Hi,
i just tested it on the current state of the appassembler-plugin (trunk)
with integration-tests but results into the following.
I have added simply
3
to my configuration for the invoker-plugin plus of course the version to
1.6...
May be i oversight something ?
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-i
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
/Anders
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 14:22, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6.
> We fixed 14 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 )
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/mav
38 matches
Mail list logo
