Thanks for the link Tibor (didn't know there was an open infra issue you
were working on). Based on that JIRA comment, they have done what I was
suggesting for Windows line lengths.
> The error message is Caused by: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess
error=5, Access is denied
Yes, need to find
Hi Jeff,
The entire problem is when trying to run a forked sub-process via
ProcessBuilder.start().
The error message is
Caused by: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess error=5, Access is denied
I found a sort of similar issue reported for Java 9 as well:
Hi Jeff,
I am not an expert for Windows internals. Here is the statement [1] given
by our INFRA team. Do you think they performed same setting you have
proposed?
If it is different, you can maybe reply on JIRA and give them the hint.
[1]:
Hi Tibor,
> I should maybe write some limitations regarding length of IT
class/method/package and length of Git branch name in README.md due to
problems with Windows paths length.
In case this helps: instead of shortening names for the Windows path length
limitation, we can configure Windows and
I will push the Jira 1490 first.
Sorry it took some time. Last days we solved issues INFRA-16168 and
INFRA-16191.
I should maybe write some limitations regarding length of IT
class/method/package and length of Git branch name in README.md due to
problems with Windows paths length.
On Fri, Mar 9,
2018-03-09 9:55 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana :
> Hi Enrico, Karl, Herve,
>
> We reported the issues [1] found during the Vote. They are fixed in
> branches [2] and CI builds [3].
> We can make a code review.
> Additionally, we fixed SUREFIRE-1490 which was in progress but we did
Hi Enrico, Karl, Herve,
We reported the issues [1] found during the Vote. They are fixed in
branches [2] and CI builds [3].
We can make a code review.
Additionally, we fixed SUREFIRE-1490 which was in progress but we did not
have spare time to include it in the Release 2.21.0. Now it is fixed in
Hello Gary, yes but my typo was corrected in the second e-mail.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> This thread has the wrong VERSION in its subject.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
I will fix all mentioned issues above but this one. I only guess what has
happened. So I need to have a log from Herve to make sure my guess is right.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Eric Lilja wrote:
> On 2018-03-06 14:27, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Herve,
>>>
>>> Can
This thread has the wrong VERSION in its subject.
Gary
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 33 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317927=12341630
>
> There are still a couple of issues left
On 2018-03-06 14:27, Tibor Digana wrote:
Hi Herve,
Can you send me a zip of the test which failed
*surefire-its/target/Surefire1177TestngParallelSuitesIT_shouldRunTwoSuitesInParallel*
?
It is a parallelism in TestNG. I will discuss it with the guys in TestNG
team on GitHub.
Thx.
Tibor
Thx to everybody!
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Tibor Digana wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Herve,
>>
>> Can you send me a zip of the test which failed
>>
+1
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi Herve,
>
> Can you send me a zip of the test which failed
> *surefire-its/target/Surefire1177TestngParallelSuitesIT_shouldRunTwoSuitesInParallel*
> ?
> It is a parallelism in TestNG. I will discuss it with the
Hi Herve,
Can you send me a zip of the test which failed
*surefire-its/target/Surefire1177TestngParallelSuitesIT_shouldRunTwoSuitesInParallel*
?
It is a parallelism in TestNG. I will discuss it with the guys in TestNG
team on GitHub.
Thx.
Tibor
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:50 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
built from sources (with classic "mvn -Prun-its verify" & Java 8) and got 2
failing unit tests:
Failed tests:
checkFileNamesWithUnicode(org.apache.maven.surefire.its.UnicodeTestNamesIT):
Did not find expected message in log
+1 (non binding)
Tested on Fedora 26/27, with J9 and J10 on my applications.
Built from surces, got only error on Unicode names tests (already known
issue)
Great !
Enrico
Il lun 5 mar 2018, 07:11 Olivier Lamy ha scritto:
> +1
>
> On 3 March 2018 at 21:42, Tibor Digana
+1
On 3 March 2018 at 21:42, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 33 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317927=12341630
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
Hi,
The only issue I have found is that the following test:
checkFileNamesWithUnicode(org.apache.maven.surefire.its.UnicodeTestNamesIT):
Did not find expected message in log
seemed to be failing on my Mac overall Maven versions and JDK versions..
JDK 8 Maven 3.1.X, 3.2.X, 3.3.X, 3.5.X
Hello Enrico,
Would you create an issue in Jira? I will fix it in the nearest release.
(Let's continue our discussion in Jira.)
Yes, it is minor issue however annoying because you see the dump file.
Details: The only problem is the order of these two lines. First line
writes to a native Std/Out
+1 (also tested on JDK10)
Thanks,
S.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 33 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317927=12341630
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
Using the '-Dgroups' parameter I get this warning.
It seems not a showstopper but the fix may be simple.
Surefire itself is corrupting stdout while writing a WARNING.
It is related to my issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/SUREFIRE-1453
Thoughts?
Enrico
# Created
Maybe disappointed a bit on how we run the build with Java 1.8 and another
J7 - J10 used in all Tests (unit + integration tests).
$ mvn install -P run-its -nsu -Dintegration-test-port=8000
-Dintegration-test-stop-port=8001 "-Djdk.home=d:\Program Files\Java\jdk10"
-Djacoco.skip=true
There were
Typo, the version is 2.21.0 of course.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 33 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317927=12341630
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
+1
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Petr Široký wrote:
> +1 non-binding. Tested on several projects with thousands of tests (both
> surefire and failsafe ones). No issue found.
>
> Env:
> Fedora 25
> Oracle JDK 8
> Maven 3.5.0.
>
> Petr
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:00
+1 non-binding. Tested on several projects with thousands of tests (both
surefire and failsafe ones). No issue found.
Env:
Fedora 25
Oracle JDK 8
Maven 3.5.0.
Petr
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:00 AM Tibor Digana wrote:
> (again from my Apache mail account)
> Pls
Am 2017-09-11 um 05:33 schrieb Tibor Digana:
Hi,
We solved 24 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12340297
There are 101 issues left in JIRA:
(again from my Apache mail account)
Pls participate in the vote and test.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Pls participate in the vote and test.
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Tibor Digana > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
Pls participate in the vote and test.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 24 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317927=12340297
>
> There are 101 issues left in JIRA:
>
+1 non-binding, tried with OpenJDK Java 8, Linux x86_64, tried on a
bunch of internal projects, non-forking mode but with --threads 2, all
junit tests, about 3k in total, tried failsafe plugin for arquillian
tests, all looks right
did not test exotic testing modes nor site plugin report
Thanks
+1 non binding, works with my production build and I can only test with
snapshot
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Thomas Collignon
wrote:
> Hello
>
> +1 for me
>
> 2017-09-12 10:29 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana :
>
> > Hi Dan,
> > Yes you can use
Hello
+1 for me
2017-09-12 10:29 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana :
> Hi Dan,
> Yes you can use such version. The URL for snapshots is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Dan Tran wrote:
>
> >
Hi Dan,
Yes you can use such version. The URL for snapshots is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Dan Tran wrote:
> Is there a snapshot i can test with my production? only see 2.21-SNAPSHOT
>
> Thanks
>
> -Dan
>
> On
Is there a snapshot i can test with my production? only see 2.21-SNAPSHOT
Thanks
-Dan
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> run unit tests on surefire project itself
>
> on JDK 9+181 run unit tests of other Java8 projects which
+1 (non binding)
run unit tests on surefire project itself
on JDK 9+181 run unit tests of other Java8 projects which required
java.se.ee module to be present
Thank you !
Enrico
2017-09-11 5:33 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 24 issues:
>
34 matches
Mail list logo