Or maybe just integrate http://www.graphdracula.net/showcase/ into the html
report and let people drag the graph to their needs. Note that the site
also lists similar projects providing similar functionality, so worth
checking out either way
On 13 April 2015 at 08:59, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 13
On 13/04/2015 03:46, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
last week, during DevoxxFR, Arnaud and I showed maven-jdeps-plugin: as
expected, a lot of users didn't know about this tool
So for sure, having this plugin and a report would help
Then there is the question of: what should the report look like?
Should it
notice: I made some tests, and animal-sniffer detects internals API use
then failOnWarning will not be useful for people already using animal sniffer
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 17 février 2015 00:04:37 Robert Scholte a écrit :
> Hi Alan,
>
> I've added a flag called failOnWarning (default:true), a
last week, during DevoxxFR, Arnaud and I showed maven-jdeps-plugin: as
expected, a lot of users didn't know about this tool
So for sure, having this plugin and a report would help
Then there is the question of: what should the report look like?
Should it be a simple stdout dump of command line re
Thanks I'll check it out.
Mandy
On 2/19/2015 12:10 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Mandy,
based on your proposal I've added 2 parameters:
dependenciesToAnalyzeIncludes and dependenciesToAnalyzeExcludes
This way it's not an All-Or-Nothing option, but instead you have full
control over the depende
Op Fri, 20 Feb 2015 04:48:54 +0100 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY
:
ok, I just updated the index page to try to improve explanations about
this
unusual/new toolchains use case (ie not trying to be consistent across
plugins)
notice that if you use ToolchainManagerPrivate like
maven-toolchains-plugi
>From my standpoint that would be amazing - we'd always struggled with how
we're going to try and educate millions of developers about running this on
their code base. Having it as a core report is a great start!
Cheers,
Martijn
On 20 February 2015 at 03:55, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> regarding fa
regarding failing or not failing (that's the question):
IMHO, it would be useful to create Maven reports: as a first step, adding
maven-jdeps-report as report will help people be aware of the state of their
code and publishing it inside their site without taking any fix action at the
moment
co
ok, I just updated the index page to try to improve explanations about this
unusual/new toolchains use case (ie not trying to be consistent across
plugins)
notice that if you use ToolchainManagerPrivate like maven-toolchains-plugin
does, you even don't require Maven 3.2.6 to do that
Regards,
Hi Mandy,
based on your proposal I've added 2 parameters:
dependenciesToAnalyzeIncludes and dependenciesToAnalyzeExcludes
This way it's not an All-Or-Nothing option, but instead you have full
control over the dependencies to include.
You can select the dependencies by using the pattern groupI
Hi Anders,
AFAIK the majority of goals is dash-based and not camelCaseBased.
I'd prefer not to guess the name of the goal, so I'd like to follow the
dash-based goal convention.
Maybe we should add/rename the goals for the m-compiler-p and
m-resources-p.
thanks,
Robert
Op Wed, 18 Feb 2015 0
Robert,
Wrt to the goal names, do we want the "test-xxx" syntax instead of
"testXxx" (used in m-compiler-p and m-resources-p)? "test-xxx" is used in
some other core plugins as well.
/Anders
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during FOSDEM 2015 a few members of the
Hi Tibor,
the plugin is just a thin wrapper around the jdeps executable to make it
easier to integrate it with your Maven project. So for the Apache Maven
JDeps plugin it is out of scope. However, you could share your idea with
the jigsaw project[1]
thanks,
Robert
[1] http://mail.openjdk
Hi Robert,
It would be great to launch the JDeps within Javac compiler. Do you think it
would be possible for JDeps?
I like the way how my annotation processor (AP) is wired with the compiler.
I don't think that JDeps use annotations. I am not sure if compiler has
other kinds of processor interfac
Hi Alan,
I've added a flag called failOnWarning (default:true), assuming that the
usage of jdkinternals is considered a warning and not an error.
With the following configuration you'll be able to run jdeps multiple
times within the same build.
org.apache.maven.plugins
Hi Alan,
if you are referring to the -R / -recursive option of the jdeps tool, then
yes you can.
See
http://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-jdeps-plugin-LATEST/maven-jdeps-plugin/jdkinternals-mojo.html#recursive
I think jdeps is first of all interesting for the classes of the current
That's exactly the reason why I hadn't started it. Ordering based on
version is simple, but you probably need to respect the other requirements
as well.
I see some challenges here: how to switch between the two without changing
the pom.xml or toolchains.xml?
I have some ideas: let me work
generic toolchain ordering doesn't seem feasible
jdk toolchain ordering, since we know fields, can be done: version is the
easiest one to order. But then there are other properties: how to order them,
since they are full open?
it will be the same if you implement order in jdeps plugin: how to o
Op Sun, 15 Feb 2015 07:09:37 +0100 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY
:
another topic:
"When using Apache Maven 3.2.6 you don't need to include the <<>>; the <<>>
can pick up..."
looking at the code, IIUC: the plugin doesn't use the jdk toolchain
configured
(or not) for the whole build with maven-toolc
Hi Hervé,
yes, you are right, it is indeed the last one specified in the toolchains
with type 'jdk'.
I'm still wondering if I should make Toolchains Comparable, so we can
indeed order them.
In that case it would really be the latest.
thanks,
Robert
Op Sun, 15 Feb 2015 07:05:05 +0100 schree
another topic:
"When using Apache Maven 3.2.6 you don't need to include the <<>>; the <<>>
can pick up..."
looking at the code, IIUC: the plugin doesn't use the jdk toolchain configured
(or not) for the whole build with maven-toolchain-plugin but will select a jdk
toolchain based on its own pre
Hi Robert,
I just had a look at jdeps doc, and was suprosed by "the maven-jdeps-plugin
can pick up the latest jdk toolchain": latest, really?
Then I had a look at the code: IIUC, it uses *the last one* declared in
toolchains.xml, but not really the latest since there is no sort on version in
c
22 matches
Mail list logo
