Something I saw a while back and have been reminded of (they just had
a recent release):
http://jameleon.sourceforge.net/
Worth looking at too? It builds on top of jWebUnit and others, and
might make authoring test cases easier.
And they build with Maven :)
- Brett
On 19/10/2006, at
Next week, I'll start implementation of UI tests for all screens.
Emmanuel
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
On 17 Oct 06, at 2:34 PM 17 Oct 06, Brett Porter wrote:
I agree with Emmanuel. IIRC, the profiles are already in the model,
and basic choice of which JDK and maven/ant installation to use
Just curious, what kind of web test framework are you going to use?
-D
On 10/18/06, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Next week, I'll start implementation of UI tests for all screens.
Emmanuel
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
On 17 Oct 06, at 2:34 PM 17 Oct 06, Brett Porter wrote:
I
On 17 Oct 06, at 2:34 PM 17 Oct 06, Brett Porter wrote:
I agree with Emmanuel. IIRC, the profiles are already in the model,
and basic choice of which JDK and maven/ant installation to use
should be straightforward and extremely useful. I agree that making
it more pervasive and using the
well, I am working on finishing up some lingering project group
functionality now, but once I knock it off my list I'll work on the
testing some. I'll need to get up to speed on the latest integration
testing work you have been working on jason, and emm mentioned on irc
a while back that he was
On 17 Oct 06, at 6:15 PM 17 Oct 06, Jesse McConnell wrote:
well, I am working on finishing up some lingering project group
functionality now, but once I knock it off my list I'll work on the
testing some. I'll need to get up to speed on the latest integration
testing work you have been
Actually, To Emannuel's point about building with clean checkout or
update, I'm working on such a thing, and should have a patch this
weekend. It'll also include the per-group/per-project/per-build-def
working directories, per my conversation with Kenney, and the do you
force a build on change,
The introduction of continuum profiles isn't impacted by the DefaultContinuum
refactoring.
If we don't provide a full continuum profiles implementation in 1.1, I think we can do a minimal one
with only the possibility to choose the maven1/maven2/ant/java home directories and use them
instead
On 16 Oct 06, at 2:34 PM 16 Oct 06, Jesse McConnell wrote:
I was going to try and wrap my head about what needed to get wrapped
up for a 1.1 release of continuum this week when I got to talking to
emmanuel this morning.
I had been under the impression that we were getting near a point that
we
I agree with Emmanuel. IIRC, the profiles are already in the model,
and basic choice of which JDK and maven/ant installation to use
should be straightforward and extremely useful. I agree that making
it more pervasive and using the toolchain support would be even
better, but I don't
I was going to try and wrap my head about what needed to get wrapped
up for a 1.1 release of continuum this week when I got to talking to
emmanuel this morning.
I had been under the impression that we were getting near a point that
we might want to polish things up and cut a 1.1 release but emm
So we have ...
1) Profiles (should call this build-profile)
This is a way to pre-define an environment type to execute the build
under.
Example of build-profile against a maven 2 java project:
* Choose the JDK to run with.
* Choose the Maven version to run with.
Example of
I wouldn't like to push a release for more features, they can be
released whenever we want as 1.2.
Re backwards compatibility we should run some tool like clirr and minimize it.
We absolutely need a database migration tool, and will be useful in
next versions too.
I've heard about ActiveMapper,
snip
I agree with Emmanuel that since 1.1 as it currently stands is not
backwards compatible (I think) with the old database we ought to just
add in what we need now...But doing this will definitely move out a
1.1 release into the new year...and is that something we want to do?
I guess best
I wouldn't make a feature-freeze just yet (I'm biased, as I have a
feature planned that is very minimal-impact. :) but I wouldn't wnat to
wait to release until the new year. I think momentum is an important
thing, and the change to group handling, the ui changes, plus the rbac
stuff makes
15 matches
Mail list logo
