Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0.1 (Take 2)

2008-01-29 Thread Brett Porter
+1! :) I'm running it now, ran through my standard set up and checked the distribution. Just some minor issues to adjust in the release process for the docs: - site.xml version needs to be adjusted prior to release in docs - release notes in the docs need to be updated before build Cheers,

Re: Continuum update

2008-01-29 Thread Rahul Thakur
I'll try to send at the same time my ideas for 2.x so we'll can discuss about them. Can't wait for 2.x design discussions to kick off :-) Cheers, Rahul Emmanuel

Re: project level exclusions

2008-01-29 Thread Carlos Sanchez
sounds like there are other 44 people that agrees with you ;) http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1977 On Jan 28, 2008 11:16 PM, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It occurs to me I'd really like the ability to apply exclusions at a more general level than each individual dep. We have ton

Re: maven release non interactive mode.

2008-01-29 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Jan 29, 2008 6:31 AM, Benoit Decherf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - There should be an option that can be setted from the command line so the plugin can run in the non-interactive mode. The release plugin docs suggest using --batch-mode, does that help?

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release Maven Surefire plugin version 2.4.1

2008-01-29 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2008/1/27, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's vote again! [Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide on a change this small is almost irresistable. ;-)] -Dan -- Forwarded message -- Date:

Re: Tree/graph of Artifact objects

2008-01-29 Thread Mark Hobson
On 23/01/2008, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far the tree seems to have enough data in it that it can be rewrapped as a graph. I have wrapper similar to DependencyNode that has multiple parents. Anywhere a child is a duplicate or conflict it's replaced by the wrapper of the

Re: Plugin Parameters: expression vs. default-value

2008-01-29 Thread John Casey
default-value is usually what plugin developers want, not expression. The reason we support both is to allow a default value extracted from the build state, but offer a name for the parameter that's different from the member variable name. It's an artifact of running for awhile without

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release Maven Surefire plugin version 2.4.1

2008-01-29 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 -Lukas Dan Fabulich wrote: Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's vote again! [Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide on a change this small is almost irresistable. ;-)] -Dan -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:53:28

Re: maven release non interactive mode.

2008-01-29 Thread Benoit Decherf
Ok, thanks. I just check the maven-release code, and the only thing that can't be done in batch mode is snapshot resolution for dependencies, that's right ? Wendy Smoak wrote: On Jan 29, 2008 6:31 AM, Benoit Decherf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - There should be an option that can be

Good program, imperfect documentation

2008-01-29 Thread Johnny
http://maven.apache.org/download.html says at the page bottom Unix-based Operating Systems (Linux, Solaris and Mac OS X) 1. Extract the distribution archive to the directory you wish to install Maven 2.0.8. These instructions assume you chose /usr/local/apache-maven-2.0.8 . The directory

Re: source of missing dependency unclear

2008-01-29 Thread John Casey
Hi Joerg, I'm sorry to hear you're having such difficulty with maven and its error-reporting. All I can offer by way of consolation right now is that I've revamped error reporting pretty substantially over the past few weeks. I started by analyzing all errors that hit the

maven release non interactive mode.

2008-01-29 Thread Benoit Decherf
Hi, I'm working on a refactoring of the release process from continuum to use maven release plugin directly (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1633) So, my first problem comes with the release.properties usage. All informations needed to create a release are setted in

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2008-01-29 Thread Mark Hobson
On 23/01/2008, Michael McCallum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:42:13 Mark Hobson wrote: There is another caveat in that it's all or nothing. Using a profile mechanism will switch all range dependencies into snapshot mode, when typically a developer only wishes to upgrade a

Re: Please comment: 2.1 Lifecycle Features on MAVEN Confluence space

2008-01-29 Thread John Casey
Right...I guess it'd help to include the URL: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Deterministic+Lifecycle+Planning Thanks! -john On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:58 PM, John Casey wrote: Hi all, I've written up the new features present in the refactored lifecycle support for 2.1, if anyone is

Re: Version ranges and snapshots

2008-01-29 Thread Michael McCallum
How about for MNG-3092 we make it configurable per repository whether the metadata resolution includes snapshots in ranges... you could even default to false to keep Dave and yourself happy and I can turn it on where i need it. I'm not certain if its possible but would perhaps be the most

Re: Tree/graph of Artifact objects

2008-01-29 Thread Carlos Sanchez
if you want something graphical take a look at http://code.google.com/p/maven-dependency-browser/ it's going to be integrated in Q4E http://code.google.com/p/q4e/issues/detail?id=144 On Jan 18, 2008 12:15 PM, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to get or make a tree of

Re: Plugin Parameters: expression vs. default-value

2008-01-29 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
default-value is usually what plugin developers want, not expression. [...] In other words, expression results should not be allowed to reflectively query the build state, as in ${project.build.directory}, Thanks for clarifying this. Until you get a proper documentation up and running, I

[Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-01-29 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Hi I started a document [1] with my ideas about Continuum 2. As you can see in this doc, I want to add lot of things in the next version. Feel free to comment on it. [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/Continuum+2.0+Design+Discussion Emmanuel

Re: source of missing dependency unclear

2008-01-29 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | Hi Joerg, Hi John, (top-posting this time) thanks for your detailed response. I am very happy to hear that you care and take this serious. Further I will be one of the early adopters if 2.1-alpha is out. Maybe I will find the time to test an 2.1

Building Maven

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Funk
Hi, I'm brand new to this subject, but I was trying to build maven the bootstrap way, like described here http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-building-m2.html but I always run into a: HOWEVER, since you did not specify a repository path, maven will use:

RE: Good program, imperfect documentation

2008-01-29 Thread Brian E. Fox
Fixed. -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 8:07 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Good program, imperfect documentation http://maven.apache.org/download.html says at the page bottom Unix-based Operating Systems (Linux, Solaris and

RE: Building Maven

2008-01-29 Thread Brian E. Fox
The easiest way to build 2.0.x is with maven itself. The bootstrap does work now for 2.1 but I wouldn't be surprised if it was broken in 2.0.x -Original Message- From: Martin Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 6:34 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: