Re: Pain with MNG-5181 (_maven.repositories)

2013-02-01 Thread Jörg Schaible
Andreas Gudian wrote: Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2013 schrieb Jason van Zyl : On Jan 31, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.comjavascript:; wrote: Hi Olivier, Thx a lot for the fix. It will help a lot the community. But from my point of view it's perhaps not yet

Re: Pain with MNG-5181 (_maven.repositories)

2013-02-01 Thread Arnaud Héritier
My position was to propose the low cost possible solution to have a quick fix and not to wait for months. If it could be fixed/configurable in aether it may be the solution to follow but I'm not sure about the status of this 3rd party project (eclipse migration ...) on which we don't have the

Re: Pain with MNG-5181 (_maven.repositories)

2013-02-01 Thread Jeff MAURY
+1 on Arnaud's comments. The main problem with this feature is that it is not documented thus I can't explain the real reason why Maven download several times released artifacts and this causes members of the Maven bashing group to grow Jeff On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Arnaud Héritier

Re: [VOTE] Plugins parent 24 and Shared parent 19

2013-02-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2013/1/30 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: Hi, I'd like to release Plugins parent 24 and Shared parent 19. Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-172/ Diffs: * Plugins parent 24:

Re: [VOTE] Plugins parent 24 and Shared parent 19

2013-02-01 Thread Robert Scholte
+0 I have to agree with Anders: m-invoker-p 1.7 is missing groovy´s XmlSlurper and 1.8 is really powerful compared to its previous versions Robert Op Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:54:36 +0100 schreef Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net: 0 It would have been good to get v1.8 of m-invoker-p in

Re: [VOTE] Plugins parent 24 and Shared parent 19

2013-02-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
Nothing prevent you to use this version with overriding that in a pom if you really need it. We are talking here only about a pom ! which doesn't have any impact neither real value for end users. Perso if I prefer to concentrate my energy and use my time for end users rather than for a pom. --

Re: [VOTE] Plugins parent 24 and Shared parent 19

2013-02-01 Thread Robert Scholte
Sure I know. But if plugins upgrade to this new parent and were depending on extra groovy-utils, they will first face breaking integration tests. Next they have to know they need to use either m-invoker-p 1.6 or 1.8. And with the parent 25 they have to remove it again since it should inherit

Re: [VOTE] Plugins parent 24 and Shared parent 19

2013-02-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 30 janvier 2013 00:40:43 Olivier Lamy a écrit : Hi, I'd like to release Plugins parent 24 and Shared parent 19. Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-172/ Diffs: * Plugins parent 24:

Re: [VOTE] Plugins parent 24 and Shared parent 19

2013-02-01 Thread Tony Chemit
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:34:59 +0100 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: +1 Keep fighting ;) thanks, tony. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org