[RESULT][VOTE]Apache Maven Wagon 3.0.0

Hi Vote has passed: +1 Robert, Karl, Olivier I will finish release process (normally today :-) ) Cheers -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #157: SUREFIRE-1383 dependenciesToScan Does Not Leverag...

Github user owenfarrell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/157 @Tibor17 - Have you had a chance to review this PR? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 3.0.0

Hi Oliver, On 08/08/17 22:00, Olivier Lamy wrote: Sounds like a very friendly ping... I hope you take it as this ;-)... So today I should have a bit of spare time to finish it.. Take your time ..I just wanted to be sure it's not forgotten somehow... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 3.0.0

Sounds like a very friendly ping... So today I should have a bit of spare time to finish it.. On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 5:54 am, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > is there a reason why this is not continued ? Just lack of time? > > The artifacts are in staging repository ? > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 3.0.0

Hi, is there a reason why this is not continued ? Just lack of time? The artifacts are in staging repository ? Do we need one more PMC vote ? If I correctly count: Robert, Olivier (not officially voted?), Karl-Heinz ? This is the needed PMC quorum ? Or did I missed something ? Kind

Re: maven-release-plugin and signing artifacts

On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 22:05:22 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi Robert, On 04/08/17 10:55, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi Karl Heinz, this can happen when the plugin configuration contains a fixed value for arguments, i.e -Dkey=value If you want arguments to be extended

Re: Maven Shared Component: Maven Archiver

IMHO we're always pretty low on the Java version for a good reason. I don't think many will notice an upgrade from Java 6 to Java 7 for plugins, especially since Maven already requires Java 7 for quite some time. And I still like the concept that 3.x simply means "requires at least Maven

Maven Shared Component: Maven Archiver

Hi, currently I look at maven-archiver component and took a look to upgrade plexus-archiver from 3.4 to 3.5 but this in consquence needs an upgrade from JDK 6 to JDK 7 in this shared component... Is this a way we could go ? I think it's time in some areas to go that way...which needs to

[GitHub] maven-site pull request #9: Addition of Cloudsmith Package to repo-managemen...

GitHub user alancarson opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/9 Addition of Cloudsmith Package to repo-management page You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/alancarson/maven-site trunk

Ready for JDK 9 ?

Hi Robert , Thank you very much for all your testing of JDK 9 during its development! Such contributions have significantly helped shape and improve JDK 9. Now that we have reached the JDK 9 Final Release Candidate phase [1] , I would like to ask if your project can be considered to be