Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
>> It is ONLY required when the runtime is Java 8 or lower AND you need to >> read the module descriptors. thx for clarifying. Am i right if I say that it would happen with J9/Toolchain used in Compiler but J8 in the Maven build? Is it realistic? Maybe some people would do it due to some other plugins unreliable on J9+ WDYT? On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:20 AM Robert Scholte wrote: > On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 13:44:48 +0200, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 13:33, Robert Scholte a > > écrit : > > > >> As far as I know, surefire won't touch the Plexus Java code that > >> requires > >> ASM. > >> It is ONLY required when the runtime is Java 8 or lower AND you need to > >> read the module descriptors. > >> > >> Maven Shade is a different case: it must parse the Java bytecode (and > >> only > >> when using minifyJar), hence it needs the latest ASM. > >> > > > > + Relocation ;) > > Well, the unexpected answer is actually No, see > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/shade/relocation/SimpleRelocator.java > > (but it might be better to do so...) > > > > > > >> Robert > >> > >> On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:35:05 +0200, Tibor Digana > >> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > >> > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > >> > We have similar upgrade in > >> > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > >> > > >> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > >> >> Maybe time for a new release? > >> >> Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > >> >> > >> >> cheers > >> >> -- > >> >> Olivier Lamy > >> >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 13:44:48 +0200, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 13:33, Robert Scholte a écrit : As far as I know, surefire won't touch the Plexus Java code that requires ASM. It is ONLY required when the runtime is Java 8 or lower AND you need to read the module descriptors. Maven Shade is a different case: it must parse the Java bytecode (and only when using minifyJar), hence it needs the latest ASM. + Relocation ;) Well, the unexpected answer is actually No, see https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/shade/relocation/SimpleRelocator.java (but it might be better to do so...) Robert On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:35:05 +0200, Tibor Digana wrote: > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > We have similar upgrade in > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> Hi, >> It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. >> Maybe time for a new release? >> Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? >> >> cheers >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
Because i understood you talking about relocating ASM within Surefire here in this thread. It did not make sense for me since the ASM always has to adapt to a new bytecode. So you mean relocating ASM in the m-shade-p, right? User's dependencies are loaded in a separate classloader, no need to relocate (plugin's dependency) ASM in Surefire plugin because it is used only in MOJO and the plugin's dependency is not loaded to user's tests. On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:42 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Not sure what you meant Tibor, just completed that relocation can need asm > upgrade in shade plugin - if we dont want users to do it in the pom which > is ok/needed if they use new java versions. > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 20:24, Tibor Digana a > écrit : > > > Relocation is useless. The ASM is changed because of the bytecode > > compatibility. We always had to upgrade plexus-java in the past; > otherwise > > the users reported a bug directly or in the Stackoverflow. > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:45 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 13:33, Robert Scholte a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > As far as I know, surefire won't touch the Plexus Java code that > > requires > > > > ASM. > > > > It is ONLY required when the runtime is Java 8 or lower AND you need > to > > > > read the module descriptors. > > > > > > > > Maven Shade is a different case: it must parse the Java bytecode (and > > > > only > > > > when using minifyJar), hence it needs the latest ASM. > > > > > > > > > > + Relocation ;) > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:35:05 +0200, Tibor Digana < > > tibordig...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > > > > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > > > > > We have similar upgrade in > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > > > > >> Maybe time for a new release? > > > > >> Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > > > >> > > > > >> cheers > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Olivier Lamy > > > > >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
Not sure what you meant Tibor, just completed that relocation can need asm upgrade in shade plugin - if we dont want users to do it in the pom which is ok/needed if they use new java versions. Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 20:24, Tibor Digana a écrit : > Relocation is useless. The ASM is changed because of the bytecode > compatibility. We always had to upgrade plexus-java in the past; otherwise > the users reported a bug directly or in the Stackoverflow. > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:45 PM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 13:33, Robert Scholte a > > écrit : > > > > > As far as I know, surefire won't touch the Plexus Java code that > requires > > > ASM. > > > It is ONLY required when the runtime is Java 8 or lower AND you need to > > > read the module descriptors. > > > > > > Maven Shade is a different case: it must parse the Java bytecode (and > > > only > > > when using minifyJar), hence it needs the latest ASM. > > > > > > > + Relocation ;) > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:35:05 +0200, Tibor Digana < > tibordig...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > > > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > > > > We have similar upgrade in > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > > > >> Maybe time for a new release? > > > >> Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > > >> > > > >> cheers > > > >> -- > > > >> Olivier Lamy > > > >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
Relocation is useless. The ASM is changed because of the bytecode compatibility. We always had to upgrade plexus-java in the past; otherwise the users reported a bug directly or in the Stackoverflow. On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:45 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 13:33, Robert Scholte a > écrit : > > > As far as I know, surefire won't touch the Plexus Java code that requires > > ASM. > > It is ONLY required when the runtime is Java 8 or lower AND you need to > > read the module descriptors. > > > > Maven Shade is a different case: it must parse the Java bytecode (and > > only > > when using minifyJar), hence it needs the latest ASM. > > > > + Relocation ;) > > > > Robert > > > > On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:35:05 +0200, Tibor Digana > > > > > wrote: > > > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > > > We have similar upgrade in > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > > >> Maybe time for a new release? > > >> Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > >> > > >> cheers > > >> -- > > >> Olivier Lamy > > >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 13:33, Robert Scholte a écrit : > As far as I know, surefire won't touch the Plexus Java code that requires > ASM. > It is ONLY required when the runtime is Java 8 or lower AND you need to > read the module descriptors. > > Maven Shade is a different case: it must parse the Java bytecode (and > only > when using minifyJar), hence it needs the latest ASM. > + Relocation ;) > Robert > > On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:35:05 +0200, Tibor Digana > > wrote: > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > > We have similar upgrade in > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > >> Maybe time for a new release? > >> Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > >> > >> cheers > >> -- > >> Olivier Lamy > >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
As far as I know, surefire won't touch the Plexus Java code that requires ASM. It is ONLY required when the runtime is Java 8 or lower AND you need to read the module descriptors. Maven Shade is a different case: it must parse the Java bytecode (and only when using minifyJar), hence it needs the latest ASM. Robert On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:35:05 +0200, Tibor Digana wrote: We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. We have similar upgrade in https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. Maybe time for a new release? Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? cheers -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
Have to admit I dont know, clearly a different load though. Feel free to ask Joel on the ticket. Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 12:49, Tibor Digana a écrit : > I have noticed this happening only with snapshot versions. The snapshot and > release repos have different h/w?! > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:44 PM Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote: > > > They work on it with some rate limiting until it gets resolved. > > They had some abnormal load. > > > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 12:24, Tibor Digana a > > écrit : > > > > > Romain, I have enabled JUnit5 5.6.0/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. > > > I want to know if the bug OSSRH-51220 is fixed. > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/junit5-snapshots/ > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:10 PM Tibor Digana > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Here is the pull request > > > > https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-languages/pull/29 > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I understand and if we can we must do but not a blocker - was my > point > > > >> Also keep in mind we could do the update automatically with asm > > > versioning > > > >> scheme using our resolver in the mojo. > > > >> So let's fix issues for most users - once again j > 11 is a play > area, > > > not > > > >> for prod today - and maybe enhance our asm integration layer later. > > > >> > > > >> Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:42, Tibor Digana > a > > > >> écrit : > > > >> > > > >> > all bad, see the stackoverflow. It happens that the users argue > that > > > >> they > > > >> > have to update our dependencies which is our responsibility! > > > >> > > > > >> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Dont think there is an api version upgrade between 7.0 and 7.2 > so > > > can > > > >> be > > > >> > > upgraded in user pom so not a blocker for a milestone release > > > >> IMHOj13 > > > >> > > and j14 are still not adopted too so all good. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:35, Tibor Digana < > > tibordig...@apache.org> > > > a > > > >> > > écrit : > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > > > >> > > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > > > >> > > > We have similar upgrade in > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy < > ol...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Hi, > > > >> > > > > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues > > fixed. > > > >> > > > > Maybe time for a new release? > > > >> > > > > Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > cheers > > > >> > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > Olivier Lamy > > > >> > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
I have noticed this happening only with snapshot versions. The snapshot and release repos have different h/w?! On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:44 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > They work on it with some rate limiting until it gets resolved. > They had some abnormal load. > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 12:24, Tibor Digana a > écrit : > > > Romain, I have enabled JUnit5 5.6.0/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. > > I want to know if the bug OSSRH-51220 is fixed. > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/junit5-snapshots/ > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:10 PM Tibor Digana > > wrote: > > > > > Here is the pull request > > > https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-languages/pull/29 > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I understand and if we can we must do but not a blocker - was my point > > >> Also keep in mind we could do the update automatically with asm > > versioning > > >> scheme using our resolver in the mojo. > > >> So let's fix issues for most users - once again j > 11 is a play area, > > not > > >> for prod today - and maybe enhance our asm integration layer later. > > >> > > >> Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:42, Tibor Digana a > > >> écrit : > > >> > > >> > all bad, see the stackoverflow. It happens that the users argue that > > >> they > > >> > have to update our dependencies which is our responsibility! > > >> > > > >> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Dont think there is an api version upgrade between 7.0 and 7.2 so > > can > > >> be > > >> > > upgraded in user pom so not a blocker for a milestone release > > >> IMHOj13 > > >> > > and j14 are still not adopted too so all good. > > >> > > > > >> > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:35, Tibor Digana < > tibordig...@apache.org> > > a > > >> > > écrit : > > >> > > > > >> > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > > >> > > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > > >> > > > We have similar upgrade in > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi, > > >> > > > > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues > fixed. > > >> > > > > Maybe time for a new release? > > >> > > > > Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > cheers > > >> > > > > -- > > >> > > > > Olivier Lamy > > >> > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
They work on it with some rate limiting until it gets resolved. They had some abnormal load. Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 12:24, Tibor Digana a écrit : > Romain, I have enabled JUnit5 5.6.0/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. > I want to know if the bug OSSRH-51220 is fixed. > > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/junit5-snapshots/ > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:10 PM Tibor Digana > wrote: > > > Here is the pull request > > https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-languages/pull/29 > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I understand and if we can we must do but not a blocker - was my point > >> Also keep in mind we could do the update automatically with asm > versioning > >> scheme using our resolver in the mojo. > >> So let's fix issues for most users - once again j > 11 is a play area, > not > >> for prod today - and maybe enhance our asm integration layer later. > >> > >> Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:42, Tibor Digana a > >> écrit : > >> > >> > all bad, see the stackoverflow. It happens that the users argue that > >> they > >> > have to update our dependencies which is our responsibility! > >> > > >> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Dont think there is an api version upgrade between 7.0 and 7.2 so > can > >> be > >> > > upgraded in user pom so not a blocker for a milestone release > >> IMHOj13 > >> > > and j14 are still not adopted too so all good. > >> > > > >> > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:35, Tibor Digana > a > >> > > écrit : > >> > > > >> > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > >> > > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > >> > > > We have similar upgrade in > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, > >> > > > > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > >> > > > > Maybe time for a new release? > >> > > > > Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > cheers > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Olivier Lamy > >> > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
Romain, I have enabled JUnit5 5.6.0/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. I want to know if the bug OSSRH-51220 is fixed. https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/junit5-snapshots/ On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:10 PM Tibor Digana wrote: > Here is the pull request > https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-languages/pull/29 > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > >> I understand and if we can we must do but not a blocker - was my point >> Also keep in mind we could do the update automatically with asm versioning >> scheme using our resolver in the mojo. >> So let's fix issues for most users - once again j > 11 is a play area, not >> for prod today - and maybe enhance our asm integration layer later. >> >> Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:42, Tibor Digana a >> écrit : >> >> > all bad, see the stackoverflow. It happens that the users argue that >> they >> > have to update our dependencies which is our responsibility! >> > >> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com >> > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Dont think there is an api version upgrade between 7.0 and 7.2 so can >> be >> > > upgraded in user pom so not a blocker for a milestone release >> IMHOj13 >> > > and j14 are still not adopted too so all good. >> > > >> > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:35, Tibor Digana a >> > > écrit : >> > > >> > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. >> > > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. >> > > > We have similar upgrade in >> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. >> > > > > Maybe time for a new release? >> > > > > Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? >> > > > > >> > > > > cheers >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Olivier Lamy >> > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
Here is the pull request https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-languages/pull/29 On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > I understand and if we can we must do but not a blocker - was my point > Also keep in mind we could do the update automatically with asm versioning > scheme using our resolver in the mojo. > So let's fix issues for most users - once again j > 11 is a play area, not > for prod today - and maybe enhance our asm integration layer later. > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:42, Tibor Digana a > écrit : > > > all bad, see the stackoverflow. It happens that the users argue that they > > have to update our dependencies which is our responsibility! > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Dont think there is an api version upgrade between 7.0 and 7.2 so can > be > > > upgraded in user pom so not a blocker for a milestone release > IMHOj13 > > > and j14 are still not adopted too so all good. > > > > > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:35, Tibor Digana a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > > > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > > > > We have similar upgrade in > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > > > > > Maybe time for a new release? > > > > > Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > > > > > > > > > cheers > > > > > -- > > > > > Olivier Lamy > > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
I understand and if we can we must do but not a blocker - was my point Also keep in mind we could do the update automatically with asm versioning scheme using our resolver in the mojo. So let's fix issues for most users - once again j > 11 is a play area, not for prod today - and maybe enhance our asm integration layer later. Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:42, Tibor Digana a écrit : > all bad, see the stackoverflow. It happens that the users argue that they > have to update our dependencies which is our responsibility! > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > > wrote: > > > Dont think there is an api version upgrade between 7.0 and 7.2 so can be > > upgraded in user pom so not a blocker for a milestone release IMHOj13 > > and j14 are still not adopted too so all good. > > > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:35, Tibor Digana a > > écrit : > > > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > > > We have similar upgrade in > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > > > > Maybe time for a new release? > > > > Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > > > > > > > cheers > > > > -- > > > > Olivier Lamy > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
all bad, see the stackoverflow. It happens that the users argue that they have to update our dependencies which is our responsibility! On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Dont think there is an api version upgrade between 7.0 and 7.2 so can be > upgraded in user pom so not a blocker for a milestone release IMHOj13 > and j14 are still not adopted too so all good. > > Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:35, Tibor Digana a > écrit : > > > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > > We have similar upgrade in > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > > > Maybe time for a new release? > > > Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > > > > > cheers > > > -- > > > Olivier Lamy > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
Dont think there is an api version upgrade between 7.0 and 7.2 so can be upgraded in user pom so not a blocker for a milestone release IMHOj13 and j14 are still not adopted too so all good. Le sam. 12 oct. 2019 à 11:35, Tibor Digana a écrit : > We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. > The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. > We have similar upgrade in > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > Hi, > > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > > Maybe time for a new release? > > Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > > > cheers > > -- > > Olivier Lamy > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > >
Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?
We still use plexus-java:1.0.3 which depends on ASM 7.0. The support for JDk 13 and 14 is in the version 7.2. We have similar upgrade in https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/pull/29 On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:53 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed. > Maybe time for a new release? > Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5? > > cheers > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >
