Hey guys,
thanks for your input. Kristian, I'd like to start with your concerns about
the threading in the forked process. With the code as it is now, you are
totally right, that threading in this LazyTestsToRun class is not really
required. It's a left-over from a previous attempt where the
2012/11/7 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com
Having given this some more thought and corrolated with Dawid's mail,
I think the main
concern with free-running forks is in the logging/reporting bits. I'm
still a firm beliver that *more* threads
never make things simpler and I
Kristian Rosenvold :
Andreas;
We have somewhat of a tradition for staying backward compatible om plugin
options. So normally we would add any alternate parameters in addition to
the existing (causing more code and duplication).
I know I am probably massively disqualified because total
Hi,
Remove the blank line at the beginning of the file. The processing
instruction ?xml ... must be the very first thing in the file.
Cheers,
Andreas
Am Freitag, 23. November 2012 schrieb ta rik :
Hello Team,
I'm following the instructions on
Hi mirko,
Nope, not on purpose. Thought I had my git configured to handle that for
me. I'll check my settings.
Thanks for the heads up,
Andreas
Am Sonntag, 16. Dezember 2012 schrieb Mirko Friedenhagen :
Hello,
looking at
I'm probably not entitled to vote, but I tested it with focus on forkMode
and reuseForks and it worked like a charm.
+1 from me, if it would count anything.
Andreas
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 schrieb Kristian Rosenvold :
More ping ;)
Kristian
Den 26. des. 2012 kl. 15:31 skrev
Martin,
you can also use the argLine property in the Surefire configuration to
pass appropriate -X* settings to the forked processes. That way you can use
any fork mode you might want and not have to pollute the general java opts
and, more importantly, the memory realm of a multi-module build (if
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2013 schrieb Jason van Zyl :
On Jan 31, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Arnaud Héritier
aherit...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Hi Olivier,
Thx a lot for the fix. It will help a lot the community.
But from my point of view it's perhaps not yet enough.
We should :
1/
I think I'd like to have the choice, i.e. I'd like an option for that.
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2013 schrieb Kristian Rosenvold :
A lot of you seemed to have realized that the latest version of war and
assembly have chosen the fast option over the compact option; and you
actually seem to
Ok, just read it - it /is/ an option. That's all I care about ;).
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2013 schrieb Andreas Gudian :
I think I'd like to have the choice, i.e. I'd like an option for that.
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2013 schrieb Kristian Rosenvold :
A lot of you seemed to have realized
Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
I'd like to welcome Andreas Gudian as our latest committer!
Andreas has been working mostly on surefire, where he has been
doing
some
great stuff.
Gaining the commit bit now means he can work on anything he
prefers
+1 (nb)
Am Samstag, 2. März 2013 schrieb Robert Scholte :
+1
Op Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:10:38 +0100 schreef Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@zenior.no:
+1
Den 2. mars 2013 kl. 16:19 skrev Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
:
Based on the sentiment on the discussion thread, I
+1 :)
2013/3/4 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com
Hi,
maven-shared-utils 0.3
--
We solved 1 issue and 2 foreign issues (SUREFIRE-946/SUREFIRE-950)
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=19021styleName=projectId=11761
There are a few issues left in
Welcome, Michael, and happy hacking! :-)
Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013 schrieb Michael-O 1983-01...@gmx.net:
Am 2013-03-24 11:46, schrieb Olivier Lamy:
On behalf of the Apache Maven PMC I am pleased to announce that
Michael Osipov (michaelo) has been voted in as a new Maven committer.
Is the difference that big only when forking?
Am Dienstag, 26. März 2013 schrieb Kristian Rosenvold :
My numbers seem quite dismal; forking the same test on linux/windows/mac:
0.75s on linux
0.95s on windows 7
1.6s on my MBP
The MBP (3Ghz 13) is /supposed/ to be approx as fast or faster
I'd love to see this happening. We would be a big step closer to allow more
user-defined providers or extensions, which could easily be added as
plugin-dependencies, without having to worry too much on when to load what.
2013/4/8 Brett Porter br...@apache.org
I looked at something similar some
How does the wicket-style approach look like?
I think we should end up with something that allows to have:
* multiple implementations of the same interface, e.g. different test
filters, different test run listeners
* configurable extensions, e.g. configure details for the filters or run
+1 :)
2013/4/9 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
+1
2013/4/9 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com:
And, to increase my winning chance in messiest vote thread of the
year, here's the correct link
for surefire 2.14.1 solved issues ;)
Hi everyone,
I just tried myself on re-deploying the surefire site, as the documentation
for the failsafe-plugin was in large parts missing.
But now the navigation bar on top is missing (that one that read: Apache /
Maven / Surefire / ...below the feather logo, where the Last Published
text is
Well, to anyone who's interested:
the problem was that I had to check out the tags of the used versions in
the parent-pom hierarchy to ../pom/maven and ../pom/asf.
I've updated the site-deployment section in the README.TXT of surefire
accordingly.
:-)
2013/4/28 Andreas Gudian andreas.gud
really
the
solution
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 5 mai 2013 23:09:16 Andreas Gudian a écrit :
Well, to anyone who's interested:
the problem was that I had to check out the tags of the used versions in
the parent-pom hierarchy to ../pom/maven and ../pom/asf.
I've updated the site
If you can create a simple IT, yes, a bug-report can be useful
did you try to checkout maven/trunks?
AFAIK, I never had any issues since I did that
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 6 mai 2013 19:30:13 Andreas Gudian a écrit :
Hi Hervé,
I would have expected it that way too, but: when un-setting
Hi,
This is my first release, so please check carefully what I may have missed
:).
We solved 16 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=19174
This is the first release that does not support JVM versions prior 1.5 to
be forked.
There are still lots of
Am Sonntag, 9. Juni 2013 schrieb Stephen Connolly :
On Friday, 7 June 2013, Andreas Gudian wrote:
We solved 16 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=19174
This is the first release that does not support JVM versions prior 1.5
+1
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Kristian Rosenvold, Olivier Lamy, Mark Struberg
+1 (non binding): Matthias Fraass, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Mirko
Friedenhagen, Andreas Gudian
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
@PMC-Members: could one of you put
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.15
This is the first release that does not support JVM versions prior 1.5
to be forked.
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
plugin
2013/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com javascript:;:
The mission of the ASF is to release software as source, and to ensure
that the released source is available under the Apache Licence.
Excuse me but I have always understand the ASF mission as building
communities around softwares.
Community
How about adding the licence link to the site.xml [1] of maven-parent? Then
we'd have it once for all the plugins developed using that parent pom. Or
is there any remote reason why someone would use that parent but another
licence?
If I hear no objections, I'll add the section there.
Andreas
+1 non-binding
2013/7/25 Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com
+1 non-binding
On Jul 23, 2013 4:00 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
wrote:
This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven
Core.
Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven
2013/8/8 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com
I just committed an update to plexus-classworlds that permits
concurrent classloading under jdk7.
I would really appreciate it if anyone would care to review this
patch, especially regarding thread safety (esp the use of guards
to
2013/8/9 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com
2013/8/9 Andreas Gudian andreas.gud...@gmail.com:
But now you need a JDK 7 to build that project, right? I didn't see that
in
the pom. Is it defined somewhere else?
That's because you're not looking at the latest commit I did
Hi,
We solved 13 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=19331
This release addresses some serious problems with character encodings in
the test report XML files and adds a new Parallel Computer implementation
to the JUnit 4.7+ provider, offering a bunch
Anyone?
If I can't collect the results today, I won't be able to do it for another
week or so.
Am Sonntag, 11. August 2013 schrieb Andreas Gudian :
Hi,
We solved 13 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=19331
This release addresses some serious
One more PMC vote would be great to get this over with... ;-)
Am Donnerstag, 15. August 2013 schrieb Olivier Lamy :
+1
On 12 August 2013 03:51, Andreas Gudian
andreas.gud...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 13 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa
And here's my +1.
2013/8/16 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
+1
On Friday, 16 August 2013, Andreas Gudian wrote:
One more PMC vote would be great to get this over with... ;-)
Am Donnerstag, 15. August 2013 schrieb Olivier Lamy :
+1
On 12 August 2013 03:51
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Kristian Rosenvold, Olivier Lamy, Stephen Connolly
+1 (non binding): Andreas Gudian
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
@PMC: could one of you please put the source bundles to the dist area and
file the release
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.16
This release addresses some serious problems with character encodings in
the test report XML files and adds a new Parallel Computer implementation
to the JUnit 4.7+ provider, offering a bunch of new
FYI, Kristian opened a Jira issue at LEGAL on that question some time ago:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-156
Am Montag, 23. September 2013 schrieb ryenus :
@Stephen, @Daniel, sorry I didn't subscribe the ML so just read your
replies via markmail.org
Regarding license, my
For the last surefire releases, I just created a tar.gz from the local
site, uploaded it to people.a.o via SCP and did the commit from there. Was
a matter of minutes instead of hours. It's cumbersome, though...
A pretty large part of the files is the Javadoc. And I don't know about you
guys, but
+1
:-)
Am Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2014 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY :
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 13 février 2014 15:14:03 Stephen Connolly a écrit :
We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August
2009.
During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a
Hi,
long ago since we released the last Surefire version. It's about time we
change that ;-).
We solved 16 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=19536
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
:52 GMT+01:00 Andreas Gudian andreas.gud...@gmail.com:
Hi,
long ago since we released the last Surefire version. It's about time we
change that ;-).
We solved 16 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=19536
There are still lots of issues left
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Olivier Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold, Hervé Boutemy, Mark Struberg
+1 (non binding): Mirko Friedenhagen, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Andreas Gudian
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Andreas
2014-03-12 22:52 GMT+01:00
Another +1 from me.
Thanks everyone!
2014-03-15 12:53 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
On Wednesday, 12 March 2014, 22:53, Andreas Gudian
andreas.gud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
long ago since we released the last Surefire version. It's about
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.17
This release comes with some smaller improvements and bug fixes for TestNG,
for the JUnit Parallel Computer, the removal of temporary files, and last
but not least it fixes a compatibility
Welcome, Mirko!
Am Dienstag, 18. März 2014 schrieb Michael Osipov :
Am 2014-03-17 20:53, schrieb Robert Scholte:
Hi,
On behalf of the Apache Maven PMC I am pleased to announce that Mirko
Friedenhagen (mfriedenhagen) has been voted in as a new Apache Maven
committer.
Mirko, welcome on
My first approach would also be to handle this in the test framework, e.g.
using the JUnit Rules as Kristian already suggested.
There you can decide on a much more fine-grained level what you want to do
in case of a failing test: re-run all the tests of the class? Or only those
test cases that
Hi,
You introduced the idea a couple of ago on this list already, and IIRC, one
main feedback question was why you don't use JUnit's Rules concept for
this. I can think of a couple of arguments to rather use Rules instead of
the extension in surefire, but I'd like to know your reasoning to go
That's a great decision! :-)
Congratulations, Karl!
Am Dienstag, 26. August 2014 schrieb Barrie Treloar :
I'm pleased to announce that the Maven PMC has voted to add Karl to the
Maven PMC.
Welcome, Karl.
I've started switching on maven-parent 25 in surefire now and I see
literary hundreds of checkstyle errors (I ignore the warnings for now).
Most of the stuff is fine with me and I'm on fixing them for a couple of
days already.
But there's one thing that struck me and that I'm a bit reluctant to
Hi Tibor,
That sounds great! Then I'd go over the open PRs on GitHub once again (I
promised some of them to be merged in time for 2.18).
Perhaps we can attempt a release later this week then.
Andreas
Am Sonntag, 26. Oktober 2014 schrieb tibor17 :
I would like to commit one more improvement
Hi,
I'm kind of done with what I wanted to get in.
Tibor, after you pushed your fix for 649 to master, you only got 1053 left
to be done, right?
Let me know as soon as you're done with that and I'll start with the
release :-)
Andreas
Am Sonntag, 26. Oktober 2014 schrieb tibor17 :
I am
I've already created the 2.19 version in Jira so issues that we know will
not make it into 2.18 can be moved there or into 3.0.
Am Montag, 27. Oktober 2014 schrieb Andreas Gudian :
Hi,
I'm kind of done with what I wanted to get in.
Tibor, after you pushed your fix for 649 to master, you
I would try to do it as soon as you're done. Preferably earlier than Friday.
Am Montag, 27. Oktober 2014 schrieb tibor17 :
Hi Andreas,
I am going to push SUREFIRE-649.
No, actually i will fix SUREFIRE-1053 and open a new minor improvement
which
takes me very short time to fix.
IMHO i
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8530 and the numerically
following ;-)
Am Montag, 27. Oktober 2014 schrieb tibor17 :
The build succeedded after SUREFIRE-649 but the deployment failed
Failed to transfer file:
2014-10-28 17:54 GMT+01:00 Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com:
Personally, I wonder why we don't merge them.
Failsafe adds some lifestyle phase bindings and then changes some
defaults. Otherwise, it's a giant anti-DRY. Why not expand surefire to
have the extra executions with shifted
Great, I'll start with that tonight.
Am Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2014 schrieb tibor17 :
Hi Andreas
Thx for your patience.
It looks like we can start making the release.
-
BR, tibor17
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
We solved 31 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=20175
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 schrieb tibor17 :
The staging is not available
http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-2.18/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html
Should not it be instead?
http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/maven-surefire-2.18/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html
Thanks, Hervé!
I've corrected the formatting of that one section that Tibor pointed out
(in the html files and for the next release in the .apt file).
2014-10-31 16:28 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr:
done
just checked out
: bb9d1ea0704be18b6c80dcf74073f98565bde926
Parents: c1267f5
Author: Andreas Gudian agud...@apache.org javascript:;
Authored: Fri Oct 31 17:02:20 2014 +0100
Committer: Andreas Gudian agud...@apache.org javascript:;
Committed: Fri Oct 31 17:02:20 2014 +0100
Looks like this source-zip can't be built due to the failing rat-check on
the generated DEPENDENCIES file as well.
I'm supposed to cancel the vote now, right? I would do a respin with an
exclusion for that file in the rat-config.
What about the other votes in progress?
2014-10-31 20:10
for Maven JXR based on this problem...
Filed in an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-184
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 11/1/14 7:05 PM, Andreas Gudian wrote:
Looks like this source-zip can't be built due to the failing rat-check on
the generated DEPENDENCIES file as well
Hi,
We solved 31 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=20175
There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:
Hmm, I would find it a bit embarrassing to release a source zip that I know
does not build without either deleting a file or skipping the rat-check,
which, as of only recently, is otherwise part of the build. That was not
the case for the previous releases... :-/
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2014
My own +1.
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2014 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise :
Hi,
first to say trying to build surefire with Maven 2.2.1 will fail with a
circular dependency...problem (as Kristian mentioned)...so best would be to
require such things not by a README better by prerequisites/enforcer
a Jira
issue and fix it for the next version.
Kristian
2014-11-03 23:12 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr
javascript:;:
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le samedi 1 novembre 2014 20:59:10 Andreas Gudian a écrit :
Hi,
We solved 31 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding):
Karl Heinz Marbaise, Hervé Boutemy, Kristian Rosenvold
+1 (non binding):
Tibor Digana, Andreas Gudian
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Could on of the PMC members please copy the source release
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.18
The release contains a number of bug fixes, and introduces an option to
automatically rerun failing tests, including proper reporting on the
console and in the XML reports for the individual
I would just respin the release with version 3.3. With Subversion it's not
that big a deal to delete a tag (with a proper comment) and recreate it for
the re-spin.
With git it would be a big no-no to replace an already pushed tag, that's
why I create the final tag only after the vote completed and
Hi Marek,
interesting... For Surefire 3.0 we have some stuff in mind to allow users
hooking in the surefire logic at several points, one of them being the
determination of tests to run and their execution order. I didn't think
about that particular case of yours, yet. But good to know.
As for
I like it. Cute but resolute birdy, and the font looks fresh and modern.
But wait - did someone shoot a hole right through the owl? You can even see
the shadow behind it. ;-) Maybe the patch in the middle could be a little
darker, perhaps with a hint/tint of the surrounding colour?
2014-11-19
+1
Am Dienstag, 25. November 2014 schrieb Stephen Connolly :
For anyone who has been living under a rock, here is the background
Background
=
I think everyone can agree that the site needs a reorganisation and a
rewrite. Users cannot find what they need, and the end result is that
I suggest Darth Mowl. But not seriously ;-).
Am Dienstag, 25. November 2014 schrieb Stephen Connolly :
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-owl-final-large.png
When I created this owl, I gave it the name Couché Tard which is a french
nickname for an owl (literal
H, H, or otherwise H.
Am Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2014 schrieb Stephen Connolly :
This is a run-off vote to select the top two options for our new mascot's
name.
The entries with the highest number of votes will be selected for the final
round. If there is only one entry with the highest
+1
2014-12-24 17:03 GMT+01:00 tibo...@lycos.com:
Hi,
We solved 13 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
projectId=10541version=20814
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
Did we already cover what we want to keep supporting via Toolchains?
We would have to take some care in Surefire if we wanted to keep some
support for 1.6 when using toolchains or when allowing users to configure
a different JVM.
2014-12-25 15:57 GMT+01:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Norbert,
yesterday I ran the whole build locally (Windows) with JDK 5 and everything
worked for me.
For the linux case, I guess it's hard to create an directory with an
invalid name. In case you don't find an alternative approach, I wouldn't be
devastated if we just removed that test case
I'm pretty sure I might be bashed for writing this, but what the heck... ;-)
I do still see some need for the maven-eclipse-plugin.
To be perfectly clear, I agree that m2e is by far superior in many ways,
not only tech-wise, but also conceptionally.
Still, at work we had to migrate from m2e to
Great, Daniel, I thought I'm the only one thinking that way... ;-)
2015-02-02 19:38 GMT+01:00 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
I’m -1 to retiring the maven-eclipse-plugin until the m2e stuff is at a
state where it can be as flexible and useful as the maven-eclipse-plugin.
Trying to bring a
package... Looking at their code, that's to be expected.
2015-02-06 18:51 GMT+01:00 Andreas Gudian andreas.gud...@gmail.com:
Hi,
With one of the previous builds, I've noticed that the mvn compiler
plugin running on JDK 9 is unable to use a different JDK from a toolchain.
Before I start
Hi,
With one of the previous builds, I've noticed that the mvn compiler
plugin running on JDK 9 is unable to use a different JDK from a toolchain.
Before I start digging into this: has anyone else noticed /
investigated that already?
On a different note: using JDK 9 to do some compiling /
I think that we don't need to fully open up our plugins so that anyone can
customize each aspect on the fly. We would too much hide the fact that
the execution is highly customized because some special stuff is hidden on
the classpath somewhere.
Likewise, if we allowed that sort of customization
Hi Norbert,
sounds great! To create a Jira-Issue for surefire [1], you just need to
sign-up on xircles [2].
You can attach your path to the Jira issue, if you like. The most fluent
way to suggest patches is by making a pull-request on GitHub where we can
directly discuss the patch.
In the end,
Hi Norbert,
Oh, I misses that one as well - our animal sniffer seems to put its nose
only into the main classes.
A new pull-request would be great.
Am Dienstag, 20. Januar 2015 schrieb Norbert Wnuk :
Hi Andreas,
The JDK API level is not enforced during build so that my accidental usage
of
Thanks, Norbert!
Could you also create a new Pull-Request for it? Then I can fetch it more
easily :-)
Am Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2015 schrieb Norbert Wnuk :
Link after pushing amended commit -
https://github.com/norbertwnuk/maven-surefire/commit/d6a8af593fc03e12ecf2dc8047669472f7ca263b
On
+1 from me.
I've tested under Windows with some projects that also contain Maven
Verifier based integration tests.
Thanks for doing this release, Jason!
2015-03-13 23:46 GMT+01:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de:
Hi Jason,
checked several projects of my own projects,
checked with:
In the last two releases of surefire, we included the jira-report in the
site, listing all resolved issues with the appropriate fix-version:
http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/jira-report.html
Am Dienstag, 10. März 2015 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise :
Hi Stephan,
On
-argument name.
2015-02-26 18:07 GMT+01:00 Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io:
On Feb 26, 2015, at 3:49 AM, Andreas Gudian andreas.gud...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can handle that, but not before the weekend.
Jason, does that conflict with your schedule for the release?
No dire rush on my side and I
Hi guys,
I'm stuck with a windows box and I can give it a try...
.bat-scripting is not really a joy, but what's in the patch should be
translatable.
Andreas
2015-02-25 17:01 GMT+01:00 Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com:
You can see actual diff to mvn shell script in [1], but the changes was
could do to make stuff easier around these .bat scripts is to
drop support for this 4NT shell and Windows versions that are not based on
NT (i.e. Windows 9x / ME).
2015-02-25 19:38 GMT+01:00 Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io:
Awesome, thanks!
On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Andreas Gudian andreas.gud
-25 19:38 GMT+01:00 Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io
javascript:;
javascript:;
:
Awesome, thanks!
On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Andreas Gudian
andreas.gud...@gmail.com javascript:;
javascript:;
wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm stuck with a windows box and I
In the windows script, I introduced a new variable for the debug settings -
perhaps we can do the same for the shell scripts.
Am Freitag, 24. April 2015 schrieb Francisco Collao Gárate :
Yep the behavior is different, in my case I was using a .mavenrc, so
when I use the mvnDebug add all
Done. Created issue MSHARED-415 and set it to resolved.
@Tibor: if there isn't anything else in the release anyway, you can also
combine both into one release-process/vote.
2015-05-04 18:47 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de:
Hi,
On 5/3/15 11:13 PM, Tibor Digana wrote:
Hi Karl,
I still have half of an issue to fix before the release - I was just
immensly lazy regarding my maven activities the last months.
So it's good you bring it up, Karl! I'll see that I get my ass up over this
weekend.
I also promised to add some lines in the relation of this plugin vs m2e
Anyone who has ever done a release of a large plugin like surefire from a
european location knows what a pain it is to svn-commit a couple of
thousand files. It takes hours, but only if you're lucky and the process is
not interrupted by the server.
I had to dance around that by zipping up the
Nice! +1
Am Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2015 schrieb Stephen Connolly :
+1
On 7 May 2015 at 18:59, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de
javascript:; wrote:
Hi,
i would like to update our main page http://maven.apache.org/ to the new
Maven Fluido Skin 1.4 including new logo which will look
Hi Tibor,
wow, that's a lot of work you put in there! Great!
As you also changed stuff in surefire-booter and I always wondered, I'm
cc-ing dev@ with this question:
Do we have any documentation on which JDKs we officially support to be used
in a toolchain configuration?
For quite a while now,
BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr:
Le vendredi 1 mai 2015 15:14:05 Andreas Gudian a écrit :
Anyone who has ever done a release of a large plugin like surefire from a
european location knows what a pain it is to svn-commit a couple of
thousand files. It takes hours, but only if you're lucky
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
