Re: Maven 3.9,0 plan

run into this issue "Unable to parse maven.config file options: Unrecognized maven.config file entries: [ -e --fail-fast -Djavax.xml.accessExternalSchema=all -Daether.connector.resumeDownloads=false]" The workaround is to break it into multiple lines -D On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 2:43 PM Tamás

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.8.6 released

Thanks for releasing this needed release looks like it is slow to appear at maven central? [1] -D [1] https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/ On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 8:48 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.6

+1 (non-binding) works well with my large internal product build Thank you for pushing this new version out -Dan On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 11:30 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1, works well on tested projects and toolings > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau |

Re: Upcoming Maven 3.8.6

Hi, possible to have 3.8.6-SNAPSHOT upload to https://repository.apache.org ? Thanks -D On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:35 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Folks, > > Maven 3.8.6 is complete, no more open issues. Thank you gnodet@! > > I'll leave people this business week to work/discuss on potential

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M6

+1 tested with a large build running both unit and integration tests in production using 3.0.0-M6-SNAPSHOT (not easy for us to pickup staging) -D On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 2:07 PM Sylwester Lachiewicz wrote: > +1 > > czw., 31 mar 2022, 14:35 użytkownik Tibor Digana > napisał: > > > Hi, > > > >

Re: Quick test at maven-surefire-3.0-M6-SNAPSHOT

found this matched JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-2033 -D On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 10:39 PM Dan Tran wrote: > From the console log, looks like junit4 provider got picked up first and > lock-in? > > -D > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 9:56 PM Dan Tran wrote: &

Re: Quick test at maven-surefire-3.0-M6-SNAPSHOT

>From the console log, looks like junit4 provider got picked up first and lock-in? -D On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 9:56 PM Dan Tran wrote: > > Hi > > My surefire 3.0.0-M4 classpath contains both junit4 and junit5 providers, > and surefire beautifully run both junit4 and

Quick test at maven-sure-3.0-M6-SNAPSHOT

Hi My surefire classpath contains both junit4 and junit5 providers, and surefire beautifully run both junit4 and junit test classes with 3.0-M6-SNAPSHOT, surefire ignores all junit 5 test class [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:3.0.0-M6-SNAPSHOT:test (default-test) @ xxxt --- [INFO] Surefire

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.5

+1 (none-binding) Tested with a large multi modules build running a number of times to verify concurrency issues Many thanks to the Maven team -D On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 12:38 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Yes, have a look at MNG-7335 and MNG-7156 > > Am 2022-03-06 um 05:30 schrieb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.5

Hello In maven 3.8.4, Maven team reverted a number of fixes (which caused regressions) related to concurrency issues. does 3.8.5 add back the fixes? The release notes mention a couple of parallel build related fixes, but i am not sure if they do address all the fixes before the revert Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wrapper version 3.1.0

Hi Could you deploy a snapshot? my company repository manager does not proxy staging repos. Can build from tag, generate the wrapper files, and run mvnw on some other host, it will fail if I use the staging RC, but I can pull maven-wrapper.jar from snapshot Thanks -D On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

me (see Jira > issue > for detailed description) > > with MWRAPPER-18, from the distributionUrl in maven-wrapper.properties, it > replaces the repository prefix: see the commit > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 9 décembre 2021, 09:19:09 CET Dan Tran a écrit : > >

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

h a fix done in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWRAPPER-18 > (showing concrete usage output) > > Is it what you expected? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 9 décembre 2021, 00:59:41 CET Dan Tran a écrit : > > sorry for hi-jack this thread. is it possibl

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

sorry for hi-jack this thread. is it possible to configure mvnw to use a new location of distributionUrl on the fly? (without touching maven-wrapper.properties) Thanks -D On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:31 AM Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > In current project configuration it is a bug rather ... We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.4

I have a concern about the reverting of a couple of Jira fixes. is the real fix also in this release and will arrive later? Thanks -D On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:53 AM Tibor Digana wrote: > +1 > Cheers > Tibor17 > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 2:28 PM Michael Osipov > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.2

sounds to me, it impacts any plugin creating a class loader? such jaxws? -D On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:20 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 21:16, Michael Osipov wrote: > > > Merci Olivier for testing. > > Would you say that the change in Maven just revealed this bug in that > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.2

Further testing and comparison with current builds, there is no concrete evidence of performance degradation. here is my +1 ( none binding) Sorry about noise -D On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 5:13 PM Dan Tran wrote: > Hello, > > I am not able to dedicate the time to do bisecting this iss

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.2

Hello, I am not able to dedicate the time to do bisecting this issue -D On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:03 AM Eric Lilja wrote: > It's an impressive list of fixes and we are many that would like to see a > 3.8.2 release appear. Question for me is if the particular change > that appears to cause a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.2

tested with my company internal build with 300+ modules. the build time increase by 10%. Not sure if anyone sees the same. but I am happy to take it due to the fix at the classpath concurrency issue. Thanks for pushing this out -D On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 1:23 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > +1 >

Re: Upcoming Maven 3.8.2

looking forward to the release. please ensure to have the latest snapshot deployed. Thank you for the awesome work. -D On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:37 AM Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Awesome work. > Well done team > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 4:31 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > I

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

Thanks, will hook it up with our internal build On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 6:59 PM Olivier Lamy wrote: > done > > On Sun, 11 Jul 2021 at 07:44, Dan Tran wrote: > > > possible to push the latest snapshot to > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

possible to push the latest snapshot to https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/maven/apache-maven ? Thanks -D On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Dan Tran wrote: > Thanks, I will test out the latest 3.8 > > -D > > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:29 PM Falk

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

Thanks, I will test out the latest 3.8 -D On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:29 PM Falko Modler wrote: > Done already: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/482 > > Cheers, > Falko > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

I think this is the one https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/413 -D On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 2:56 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2021-07-10 um 00:52 schrieb Dan Tran: > > ah sorry, the proposed PR merged into master. Can we back port it to > 3.8? > >

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

ah sorry, the proposed PR merged into master. Can we back port it to 3.8? -D On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 3:47 PM Dan Tran wrote: > ping again :-) to keep discussion going :-) > > -D > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:20 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> Maybe not that many p

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

ping again :-) to keep discussion going :-) -D On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:20 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Maybe not that many people are using parallel builds... > Imho, the PR should be merged. I've created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7157 to provide a better API > and

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

ithub.com/apache/maven/pull/310 > > > > > > The solution with ThreadLocal would eat too much memory. > > > Reimplementing the POJO classes in Maven and making them thread safe > > would > > > solve many issues in the Core and Resolver. > > > C

Re: MNG-6843 Parallel build fails due to missing JAR artifacts in compilePath

we are facing the same issue at work (300+ modules), classpath empty randomly empty Love to see some resolution, will help to test it Thanks -D On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:51 PM Falko Modler wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to raise awareness for the MavenProject concurrency problem > that

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.1

+1 none-binding However, I still see random compilation failure at my multiple thread build. I am hoping the latest maven-resolver would make it go away :-) Thanks -D On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 3:16 PM Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > +1 > > this time, I could reproduce the build, done with JDK 8 on

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

without -Daether.checksums.algorithms=SHA1,MD5, very slow -D On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 3:11 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Awesome, what about with the fix, but with the default list of hashing > algos (SHA-512, SHA-256, SHA-1, MD5) in place? > > Am 2020-09-27 um 00:07 schr

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

t; > Thrilled to see your results. If this works, please remove the property > and see whether the patch along with SHA-2 on URLs changes the > performance as well. > > Michael > > Am 2020-09-26 um 21:45 schrieb Dan Tran: > > I am able to pin down the problematic c

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

ums.algorithms=SHA1,MD5 (previous behavior) > > * > > https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/commit/3c2a5141c9d393a45bdee873e6aa2c9c275b7b58?w=1 > > But still this wouldn't make any sense. > > Looking forward for some findings. > > Am 2020-09-15 um 22:45 schrieb Dan Tran:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:30 PM Dan Tran wrote: > Maven 3.7.0 with Resolver 1.4.2 - no issue > > Maven 3.7.0 with Resolver 1.6.0 + trace. I cant get any indication > about > > 4626 [main] [TRACE] GlobalSyncContextFactory$GlobalSyncContext - Acquiring > global.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

analyzable data from you. > > Michael > > > Am 2020-09-15 um 11:49 schrieb Dan Tran: > > I build maven 3.7.0 + MResolve 1.6.0. The same slow build observed at my > > 300+ modules ( 60min versus 5min) > > > > -1 ( non-binding) from me. there must and optio

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

I build maven 3.7.0 + MResolve 1.6.0. The same slow build observed at my 300+ modules ( 60min versus 5min) -1 ( non-binding) from me. there must and option to disable this new feature -D On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 4:33 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2020-09-14 um 10:57 schrieb Dan T

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

sorry about the fast finger, my test shows a huge increase in build time for large builds. Possible to disable this feature? Thanks -D On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:49 AM Dan Tran wrote: > possible to disable this feature > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123 ? > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.0

possible to disable this feature https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-123 ? On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:06 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1, tested in java 8 with mvn 3.6.3. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.5.0

I am interesting pickup latest maven-resolver hoping it can solve some random issue at our builds Since 1.5.0 no longer available, I rebuilt maven 3.6.3 with maven-resolver 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT. and hook it up our internal build The startup of my build is quite slow... however, I am looking forward

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M5

+1 tested with our 300+ maven modules build Found the following new 'good' behaviors/fixes 1. Junit 4 test class now have 'public' scope at both class and method level. 2. Exception at test 'setup' ( ie @Before) now show up as failures, They are ignored at M4 Great works Thanks On

Re: Same snapshot deploy number for entire build - possible

, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:31 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Dan, > Are you running a single 'mvn deploy' or do you have multiple runs? > I have never seen weird behaviours in multi module projects > > Cheers > Enrico > > Il ven 13 set 2019, 08:19 Dan Tran ha scritto: > >

Re: Same snapshot deploy number for entire build - possible

Hello, Maven dev any suggestion/thoughts on this issue are very much appreciated Regards -D On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:06 PM Dan Tran wrote: > Hello Maven Users and Development Team > > Currently, artifact deployed as snapshot at Maven repository has the > following format > &g

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Version 3.6.2

+1 non-bind, tested with company production builds. Should we give Intellij user a warning? On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:05 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > > the vote passed with the following resuts: > +1 jes...@udby.com, Tibor Digana, Mickael Istria, Romain Manni-Bucau, > Francois Papon, Hervé

Re: [maven-surefire] branch master updated (f7d4310 -> 8109b4f)

end. > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/master/53/ > We have to wait few hours because the Jenkins queue is full. > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 9:03 AM Dan Tran wrote: > >> @Tibor Digana I would be very helpful to >> deploy last surefire snapshot,

Re: [maven-surefire] branch master updated (f7d4310 -> 8109b4f)

@Tibor Digana I would be very helpful to deploy last surefire snapshot, so users ( like me) can easily help testing it with our internal builds Thanks -D On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:32 PM wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > tibordigana pushed a

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.3

+1 none binding, tested with Maven 3.6.2-SNAPSHOT + wagon-3.3.3 ( at staging) against an internal build Thanks for pushing out this release -D On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 3:34 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2019-06-13 um 15:46 schrieb Michael Osipov: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 6 issues: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Version 3.6.1

+1 ( non-binding) Tested with a large multi-modules build using CI/CD mode + m2e under takari team Thanks -D On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 9:29 AM Mickael Istria wrote: > Hi, > > Unfortunately, we won't have the opportunity to try it in m2e before the > deadline for voting as it seems like some

Re: Maven 3.6.1 release date

MNG-6605 indeed is a good one to have On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:08 AM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 01.04.19 08:54, Michael Osipov wrote: > > Am 2019-03-31 um 21:36 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to collect the issues which should be part of

Re: 3.6.1 release?

love to see 3.6.1 out soon :) -D On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:50 AM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 04.02.19 17:36, Michael Osipov wrote: > > I need to push Wagon first. It contains a regression for connection TTL. > > Yes of course.I know.. > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.2

+1 tested with maven-3.6.1-SNAPSHOT building large maven project -D On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 4:13 PM Tibor Digana wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:15 AM Michael Osipov > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 12 issues: > > > > >

Re: [maven] branch master updated: [MNG-6571] forgot to put new instance in cache

I am seeing test failure at the latest maven-core. is it a known issue? [INFO] Running org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.VersionRangeTest[ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.006 s <<< FAILURE! - in

Re: Are snapshots available in some Maven repo?

how about just deploy nightly snapshot of active 'main' branch ( ie master)? -D On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:03 AM Robert Scholte wrote: > Now that we use branches actively, it is way more important where a > SNAPSHOT is coming from. > I've seen it too often that people thought they were testing

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.1

+1 tested with maven-3.6.1-SNAPSHOT plus wagon-3.3.1 against a large build. -D On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:28 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122=12344772 > > There are still a couple of issues left

Re: VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.0

Revert WAGON-537 <https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-537> fixes the issue. -D On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 2:25 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2018-12-28 um 20:32 schrieb Dan Tran: > > The regression was introduced by > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-

Re: VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.0

The regression was introduced by https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-537 which has changes at AbstractWagon used by all providers. Best to localize the change for http provider only note: wagon-maven-plugin uses its own wagon-ssh, but still share the base class with its maven runtime. that

Re: VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.3.0

Unfortunately, I found a regression at wagon-ssh where ssh download hangs. See https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-543 On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 2:21 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122=12344436

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.6.0

+1 (none binding) tested 300+ maven modules project with special interested of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6412 On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 1:55 PM Sylwester Lachiewicz wrote: > +1 from me. Tested based on Spring Boot multithreaded build and Java 11. > > Yes, it would be good to have

Re: issue with junit 5 integration

> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le mer. 5 sept. 2018 à 07:41, Dan Tran a éc

Re: issue with junit 5 integration

Odd, I am under impression surefire auto detect junit-jupiter-engine at runtime am I missing something? -D On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 10:08 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > It does _NOT_ work and as mentionned you can test on meecrowave trying to > upgrade the version in junit module. > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.4

+1 (non-binding) tested on windows/linux using a large multi-module build with Takari's smart builder and verified the Jansi multi-threaded fix for Windows -D On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Sylwester Lachiewicz < slachiew...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > Sylwester > > pon., 18 cze

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.0

+1 (Non binding) testest with a large multi-module with mixtures of junit5/4 and testng Huge thanks for getting this out and it just works very impressive -D On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 15 issues: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

Hi all Sylwester Lachiewicz provided a fix for jansi 1.18-SNAPSHOT which resolves my issue. I am not able to reproduce antrun issue -Dan On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > S. > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Stephen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

gspot.com/ > > https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ > > https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > correction > > > > > > found this reference, found on 3.5

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

correction found this reference, found on 3.5.2 but I only encounter this on 3.5.3 RC https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48723899/maven- numberformatexception-when-packaging On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 1:13 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > found this reference, found on 3.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

found this reference, found on 3.5.2 but I only encounter this on 3.5.2 RC https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48723899/maven-numberformatexception-when-packaging On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:53 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > my build contains 270+ modules using java 8. Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

my build contains 270+ modules using java 8. The failure found on windows. Have not tested on Linux yet -D On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > Encounter random failure at antrun MOJO + smart builder > > here is the error message >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

Encounter random failure at antrun MOJO + smart builder here is the error message [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.8:run (work.around.to.clean.up.classes.before.jsonschema.start) on project adm-schema: Error executing Ant tasks: For input string: "1;"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.2

ouch false alarm, I forgot to configure the artifactory mirror Sorry about the noise -D On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not able getting mvn 3.5.2 to download an internal snapshot > dependency from comp's central artifactory > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.2

I am not able getting mvn 3.5.2 to download an internal snapshot dependency from comp's central artifactory here is the error Caused by: org.eclipse.aether.resolution.DependencyResolutionException: Could not find artifact com.oracle.linux.x86_64:jre:rpm:1.8.0_151-SNAPSHOT at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

gt; > Hi Dan, > > Yes you can use such version. The URL for snapshots is > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots > > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Is there a sn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

Is there a snapshot i can test with my production? only see 2.21-SNAPSHOT Thanks -Dan On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > run unit tests on surefire project itself > > on JDK 9+181 run unit tests of other Java8 projects which

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

False alarm, I missed configure global settings.xml, it is missing the default repository setup -D On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > +1: > 3.5.1 works in my project like a charm ;-) > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Stephen Connolly < >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

I have no issue build maven 3.5.2-SNAPSHOT with clean verify at top level, but the following build fails mvn clean verify -f apache-maven C:\views\dev\maven\maven>mvn clean verify -f apache-maven [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

Looks like 3.5.1 not able to resolve snapshot dependencies i just clone out apache-maven and, change directory to apache-maven and build from there here is error [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project apache-maven: Could not resolve dependencies for project

Re: [MNG-6084] Support JSR 250 annotations

Of course, I second that for 3.5.1 Thanks -Dan On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2017-05-25 um 05:11 schrieb Dan Tran: > >> Thanks Michael for pushing this out. Looking forward to use it in 3.5.1 >> > > Just

Re: [MNG-6084] Support JSR 250 annotations

Thanks Michael for pushing this out. Looking forward to use it in 3.5.1 -D On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Who seconds MNG-6084 for 3.5.1? > > This one was developed by Dan Tran. I added non-functional fixes to it. > All ITs pass

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 3

Tested with 2.20-SNAPSHOT (no access to staging at production build) encountered a couple of failing tests (*Tests.java) which started to run due to - [SUREFIRE-1260 ] - Add **/*Tests.java as one of the default include patterns Other

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 2

is 2.20-SNAPSHOT up to date? that is only quick way I can test Thanks -D On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > @Petr > Both issues are fixed now. Would you please verify this version from > master? I tested on my side. > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 2.12

+0 this release works at my side, however the Http HugeFileDownloadTest almost double between 2.11 (dropped) and 2.12. 162 sec versus 301 sec on my virtual Centos 7 4CPU, OpenJDK 7 Sorry about late response May want to have an explanation for the discrepancy before release Thanks -Dan

Re: [VOTE] Reset Maven Core, Integration Tests and Resolver repository master branches

+1 (Committer) Special thanks for pulling all these together -D On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 at 6:40 pm, Karl Heinz Marbaise > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > +1 (PMC + Committer) > > > > > > > > Kind

[Wagon] http-provider suite is longer by 3 minutes

Hi, before the canceled wagon-1.11 the suite was about 6minutes, now it is 9 min on my virtualbox centos 7, jdk 7 Is it a concern? Thanks -Dan PS the good thing the huge http test no longer timeout on my box

Re: Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11 - Cancel

is not reliable given people who have copied it won't have it > removed > > automatically) > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le mardi 3 janvier 2017, 18:59:15 CET Dan Tran a écrit : > > > I reverted the poms back to 2.11-SNAPSHOT not keep the

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11 - Cancel

I reverted the poms back to 2.11-SNAPSHOT not keep the tag for now since some ppl may object removing remote history. so we can keep the tag and move to 2.11.1-SNAPSHOT or remove wagon-2.11 tag and move on -Dan On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11 - Cancel

yes I can. so it is ok to remove the tag? -D On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2016-12-28 um 19:46 schrieb Dan Tran: > >> Hi >> >> I am going to cancel this vote due to inconsistent test failure at >> wagon

Re: [DISCUSS] Big Scrub for proposed 3.5.0 (if we reset master)

I would like to add MNG-6084 WONTFIX Support JSR 250 @PreDestory and @PostContruct On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2017-01-01 um 02:11 schrieb Anton Tanasenko: > >> FIX-3.5.0: >> MNG- WONTFIX Add a ProjectArtifactsCache

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11 - Cancel

Hi I am going to cancel this vote due to inconsistent test failure at wagon-http provider on huge download test. Thanks -Dan On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Michael Osipov <mosi...@gmx.de> wrote: > Am 2016-12-28 um 06:05 schrieb Dan Tran: > >> i still see the same timeout e

Re: [1/2] maven-wagon git commit: [WAGON-474] Upgrade and revise all tests for Jetty 8

strange, i placed your recommended logger settings under systemPropertyVariables and see no log for the timeout issue Anyway I am going to cancel the vote and have to roll it again Thanks -Dan On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2016-12-28 um

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11

all now. since I cant release it -Dan On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Am 2016-12-25 um 19:51 schrieb Dan Tran: > >> Just want to confirm, your FreeBSD and build.apache.org's ubuntu see the >> same test failu

Re: [1/2] maven-wagon git commit: [WAGON-474] Upgrade and revise all tests for Jetty 8

redhat7/openjdk 7 ( latest) this test fails on timeout. I have seen this issue before not lately. Used to work on 2.9, 2 10, and 2.11) -D On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2016-12-26 um 01:45 schrieb Dan Tran: > >> this b

Re: [1/2] maven-wagon git commit: [WAGON-474] Upgrade and revise all tests for Jetty 8

this branch has one test consistently fail test on my local redhat 7, java 7 Running org.apache.maven.wagon.providers.http.HugeFileDownloadTest On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 3:58 PM, wrote: > Repository: maven-wagon > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/jetty-8 [created]

Re: maven-wagon git commit: [WAGON-471] Clean up dependency mess (reported by dependency:analyze)

is it necessary to introduce org.slf4j slf4j-simple as compile scope? Thanks -Dan On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 12:10 PM, wrote: > Repository: maven-wagon > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 4da2accfd -> b451e418e > > > [WAGON-471] Clean up dependency mess

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11

Just want to confirm, your FreeBSD and build.apache.org's ubuntu see the same test failure?? Do you think we should cancel the vote and wait for your fix? Thanks -Dan On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2016-12-25 um 18:45 schrieb

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11

think it is related, could be from build env Thanks On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2016-12-24 um 04:07 schrieb Dan Tran: > >> Hi, >> >> We have fixed 18 issues: >> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Rel

[VOTE] Releasing Wagon 2.11

Hi, We have fixed 18 issues: *https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122=1296 * There are still issues left in JIRA:

Re: [HEADS UP] Releasing maven-wagon-2.11

elo <http://10.0.0.9:8080/user/michaelo/> / detail <http://10.0.0.9:8080/view/wagon/job/wagon/job/maven-wagon/63/changes#30631655e8f6cdf121161b3ca09e3da0134a5198> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2016-12-11 um 19:59 schrie

Re: [HEADS UP] Releasing maven-wagon-2.11

Sure -Dan On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2016-12-11 um 19:59 schrieb Dan Tran: > >> Hi >> >> I am planning to stage maven-wagon-2.11 tomorrow night US Pacific time. >> Let me know if you need me to wait >

[HEADS UP] Releasing maven-wagon-2.11

Hi I am planning to stage maven-wagon-2.11 tomorrow night US Pacific time. Let me know if you need me to wait Thanks -Dan

Need help to fix jenkins build at https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wagon-1.7/504/

Looks like Jenkins does not like the provided maven ERROR: Processing failed due to a bug in the code. Please report this to jenkinsci-us...@googlegroups.comjava.lang.IllegalArgumentException :

Re: Maven Classloader issue at Wagon

I went ahead to deploy the fix for user to try out -Dan On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > I got it working by switching > > componentConfigurator.configureComponent( wagon, plexusConf, > container

Re: Maven Classloader issue at Wagon

I got it working by switching componentConfigurator.configureComponent( wagon, plexusConf, container.getContainerRealm() ); for componentConfigurator.configureComponent( wagon, plexusConf, (ClassRealm)this.getClass().getClassLoader() ); Thoughts? -Dan On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Dan

Maven Classloader issue at Wagon

I am interested fixing the long waited issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-454 ( since introduction of Maven 3) where a wagon user can configure additional wagon provider configuration at maven settings It boils down to this line

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >