Yes, I know. I previously made the change in the classes copied from
plexus-utils. This change is here only to track the plexus-utils version where
the original modifications are.
Selon Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The site plugin still has a prerequisite of Maven 2.0.2, so this change
Since the question of choosing an Eclipse Integration is often asked, I
just worked on the Eclipse Integration page from Maven Users Wiki:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Eclipse+Integration
I started a comparison matrix with basic project informations.
This Wiki is public: feel free
this was added in r745216, when upgrading to Modello 1.0: see [1] for the
precise modification.
Selon Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
Hmm, why was this added?
The modello-maven-plugin is configured to generate an XML Schema, then I had to
add the xml.schemaLocation configuration to avoid a
ok, I understand your concern: I'll revert immediately the change in 2.2.x
branch, and let's discuss a little bit to decide if I revert it in 3.x too :)
The good question: what is the gain by this change?
I think the order we, the Maven project, chose one year ago is well thought
after a long
+1 for a canonical POM ordering of elements
we could check it as an enforcer rule (activated by people interested in it).
We need a tool too to help reorder the POM.
Sorry, I don't have time to work on it for the moment, but definetely +1 :)
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail Original -
De: Paul
+1
Hervé
- Mail Original -
De: Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com
À: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Lundi 28 Décembre 2009 10h04:58 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parent POM 7
+1
Arnaud Héritier
Hi Baptiste,
Seems like Maven 2 still has a bug in XML encoding support, incorrectly using
platform encoding when it should detect the encoding from the plugin.xml file.
If Maven 2 can read such a malformed XML file, the bug is in Maven 2, not Maven
3: I'll have to track and fix it. Please open
+1
Hervé
- Mail Original -
De: Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
À: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Août 2010 22h37:27 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [VOTE] Release Surefire version 2.6
+1
2010/8/10 Stephen Connolly
maven-aether-provider is in Maven-3 in github:
http://github.com/bentmann/maven-3
it contains Maven-specific code, particularly everything to read Maven's
pom.xml and maven-metadata.xml from remote repository.
It is an intended dependency, since aether is a repository/dependency container
with
whoops, sorry for the wrong link
for the diff, it is available from the site: that's one of the new features
(even if not really built into the pom itself)
Regards,
Hervé
- Brett Porter br...@apache.org a écrit :
On 07/08/2011, at 8:14 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Staging repo:
here is my +1
Hervé
- Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org a écrit :
+1
2011/8/7 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr:
Hi,
This project consists of a POM that contains settings that are
likely to be
useful to any Apache project that is building and releasing code
with Maven
2/3.
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Brett Porter, Olivier Lamy, Mark Struberg, Stephen Connolly,
Kristian Rosenvold, Emmanuel Venisse, Hervé Boutemy
+1 (non binding):
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Regards,
Hervé
+1
Hervé
- Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org a écrit :
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=16773styleName=TextprojectId=11127Create=Create
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-005/
Staging site:
+1
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org
À: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Samedi 7 Juillet 2012 04:34:16
Objet: Re: [VOTE] Tony Chemit as Apache Maven committer
+1
-Lukas
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
+1
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
À: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Août 2012 15:52:05
Objet: [VOTE] Release Maven Parent pom 22, Maven Plugins Parent pom 23, Maven
Shared Components 18
Hi,
I'd like to release:
* Maven Parent
+1
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: Stephane Nicoll stephane.nic...@gmail.com
À: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 10 Août 2012 06:56:41
Objet: [VOTE] Maven Shared Filtering 1.1 - Maven Script Interpreter 1.1 - Maven
Invoker Plugin 1.7
Hi,
In order to release the
see http://svn.apache.org/r1467751 for an exemple of m-site-p dependency
configuration to test the component
- Mail original -
De: Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr
À: dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Dimanche 14 Avril 2013 10:10:41
Objet: [VOTE] Release Maven Reporting Exec version 1.1
I created MNG-5780 to track the change
I let the issue open, because I hope that we won't have to revert the commit
after someone steps in with a strong reason not to upgrade
But in 48h, if nobody votes -1 woth a strong issue, I'll close the issue and
point to the (a little bit too quick at
Hi,
It's a known wrong and misleading message, tracked as MNG-5477
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de
À: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 6 Mars 2015 09:32:01
Objet: Maven 3.0.5 Problem
Hi,
during the tests of maven
Archiva, Continuum and Groovy have only 1 Jira project each: creating groups is
not useful, since adding someone to the group is equivalent to adding to the
project role.
Since adding someone to Jira project role can be done by project members, but
adding someone to a Jira group will require
I checked SCM configuration: permissions were ok, but not roles
I fixed roles to match common configuration, ie committers = maven-developers,
PMC = maven- administrators
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail d'origine -
De: Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com
À: Maven Developers List
This one is clearly the one I was fearing last time you reported an issue
parent pom still has old svnpubsub url, causing unwanted relative path
Should either release parent pom or use m-site-p topParentUrl param to force
relative path calculations (like multi module builds)
Regards
Hervé
now that you told it, I'd seriously prefer change Doxia Markdown parser to use
an XhtmlParser instance internally instead of extending XhtmlParser while
completely replacing content parsed by the Xhtml parser: this would be a lot
more clear (and would avoid adding bloat to getType())
I didn't
IMHO, what is not clear in your explanations is that scm url is not the url of
the repo
scm url is scm:provider:provider-specific content
our git scm url is currently weak, since it does not define path in repo: then
just add it, in a location perfectly disctinct from repo url inside the scm
ok, so both comments were right, we need to:
- add unit tests whenever makes sense
- add plugins trunks built with Maven core HEAD in our Jenkins setup
the more eyes, the more good enhancement ideas :)
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: Anton Tanasenko atg.sleepl...@gmail.com
À:
yes, currently we consider only core ITs as core ITs [1]: but plugins trunks
are good core ITs candidates too :)
Regards,
Hervé
[1] https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs/
- Mail original -
De: Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io
À: Maven Developers List
wow, I don't like this
in XML, encoding is self provided
with such feature, an XML-invalid document can be read by Maven (and Maven
only, since it is XML-invalid)
I'm -1 on this: we can't help people make Maven-specific pseudo XML
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De:
Hi,
AFAIK, there is currently a severe problem with aggregate reports, causing
multiple executions: I couldn't find issues references at the moment, but I can
provide
Then when working on this, please check that the multiple execution problem
doesn't get worse
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail
+1
notice that the / is important for the staging site URL: this avoids a
redirection to /components
see http://maven.apache.org/archetype-archives/archetype-LATEST/
(vs wrong http://maven.apache.org/archetype-archives/archetype-LATEST )
but no problem for the release: great work, thanks for
Hi Lukas: nice to se that it has catched your interest :)
Yes, DOXIA-436 is the ideal, where we completely remove any Xhtml intermediate
The idea here is less ambitious: just avoid extending XhtmlParser, since the
source is not Xhtml/Xml
But of course, don't hesitate to help!
Regards,
Hervé
Since Brian can't do the job for now (ie adding you to the maven-dev Jira
group, that gives you proper karma to every Maven Jira project), I added your
login to ARCHETYPE Jira project to avoid you loosing time waiting: now you can
work immediately! :)
(FYI, Brian is the only one who has karma
Hi,
I just found Petar git commits, but didn't see them in commits@m.a.o (then
reported little issues somewhat late as I didn't notice them earlier)
Is there some missing configuration on this repo?
Are there other Maven git repos with such missing configuration?
PLease some git expert at ASF
ok, created INFRA-10093
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
À: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Dimanche 9 Août 2015 17:41:51
Objet: Re: maven-archetype git commits not sent to commits@m.a.o?
I'd suggest an INFRA ticket.
On
no, nothing that deserve stopping the release: just the Jira issues that don't
get a link to code fix in SCM
I found the issue and its cause in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-483
The fix for now is in Jira issues (manually adding links)
And for future commits, it's in the
IIUC, your concerns are about Mardown: if Markdown parser has a bug, don't
hesitate to fix it
but do not break content for normal XML parsers, like fml or xdoc
since your change did not make unit tests fail, this proves unit tests are too
weak: I just improved them in r1695408 to fail (and show
ok, I took time to find back Jira issues related to what I'm fearing:
MJAVADOC-171 and related issues
I'll need some time to carefully review your patch, since it's quite big and
the plugin is already quite complex
if others could have a look at it too, that would probably help
Regards,
Hervé
true, no method
we documented it in the notice at the end of model building reference
documentation [1]
But for sure, once Maven 4 is out with an improved model and compatibility
layer for Maven 3, these 2 encoding parameters are the first candidates to go
into the enhanced model :)
Regards,
this is a *bug report* squash, not a bug squash
And looking at the list, I see not only bug reports but a good number of
enhancements notes (TODO list): perhaps limiting the search to bugs only would
avoid dropping our TODO list
And this notice IMHO should go to maven-users too
Regards,
I'd like it, but I have no idea how to do it because of:
- the time it has to happen (ie after vote success)
- the credentials required
- need not only to add new release but also remove older (this one is the
simple one to fix, a wildcard for version may do the job)
something that can be done
yes, that's a good cleanup
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Michael Osipov" <1983-01...@gmx.net>
À: dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 23 Décembre 2015 21:30:28
Objet: Retiring Maven Skins
Hi folks,
Hervé is quite busy right now preparing Doxia (Sitetools) 1.7 along with Maven
+1
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Robert Scholte"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Dimanche 5 Juin 2016 21:15:26
Objet: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Component: Maven Archiver Version
3.1.0
+1
On Fri, 03 Jun 2016
+1
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Robert Scholte"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Dimanche 5 Juin 2016 21:48:38
Objet: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Resources Plugin version 3.0.1
+1
On Fri, 03 Jun 2016 23:36:36 +0200, Karl
+1 good idea
there are so many cases that I don't think any algorithm can give really
meaningfull result, unless we add more fields to describe precisely how to keep
a meaningfull order on each merge
trying to summarize the current situation is a good first step
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail
true: I know it sounded familiar... :)
this artifact seems used by maven-remote-resources-plugin only
And if you look at the content, it contains a little helper to resolve
dependencies: we should probably deprecate it at the end
If there is no objection, I'll update code in a few days to
sorry, I find it somewhat abstract: it does not tell anything about the
interactions
Even if I agree that resolver does not tell everything, just the majority and
most complex
Regards,
Hervé
(sorry, on holidays with unusual email access: tracking such thread is not
easy...)
- Mail
Hi,
Please have a look at answers from Robert and myself on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-519 (for the second PR)
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Rajiv Jain"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Jeudi 4 Août 2016 22:45:40
the whole functionality of the lib is visible in one interface: RepositorySystem
http://maven.apache.org/aether-archives/aether-LATEST/apidocs/org/eclipse/aether/RepositorySystem.html
in this interface, 6 methods are about resolution + 1 about collection (a
special "sort of" resolution) + 1 to
if I let apart the confusion with java jars...
it's not a specification: the specification of the repository is in
maven-aether-provider dependencies
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Christian Schulte"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé:
yes, in the current case, this is an internal component name we're looking for:
end-users will not notice
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Gary Gregory"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Vendredi 5 Août 2016 00:15:24
Objet: Re:
sure: isn't git supposed to solve everything?
:)
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Stephen Connolly"
À: "Maven Developers List" , i...@soebes.de
Envoyé: Vendredi 3 Février 2017 13:07:50
Objet: Re: Can we disable emails to
seconded for 3.5.0
yes, basic bug fix
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Arnaud Héritier"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Mardi 31 Janvier 2017 21:44:09
Objet: MNG-5961 for 3.5.0 ?
Hi,
This is a so easy one I fixed a long time ago in
will do when removing support for Maven 2
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Robert Scholte"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Samedi 12 Novembre 2016 18:33:22
Objet: Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Site Plugin version 3.6
I like the new description
What I still don't understand is "Since they are replaced, dependencies with a
scope of <<>> do not actually participate in limiting the transitivity
of a dependency.": what's the intent with this?
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: schu...@apache.org
À:
here is my +1
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "herve boutemy" <herve.bout...@free.fr>
À: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org>
Envoyé: Dimanche 13 Novembre 2016 00:23:50
Objet: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Site Plugin version 3.6
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Olivier Lamy, Michael Osipov, Hervé Boutemy
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
- Mail original -
De: "herve boutemy" <herve.bout...@free.fr>
À: "Maven Developers List&q
wow, removing jansi jar file is expeditive, but for sure gives guaranteed
result :)
Currently, there are 2 ways to disable color:
- -B option: batch mode
- -l option: log file
(if you search for "setColorEnabled" in MavenCli, you'll see)
For the moment, after discussions we had on the ML, the
I completely overlooked the failing IT on Windows: thanks for fixing
On ASF Jenkins,
MavenITmng3599useHttpProxyForWebDAVTest.testitUseHttpProxyForWebDAV looks
flaky: sometimes it passes, but fails in general. Any idea?
regarding MavenITmng4625SettingsXmlInterpolationWithXmlMarkupTest, it was
perhaps there are issue in how Maven sees some Windows OS: I don't have such
machines at hand to clearly tell how each precise OS version is displayed
Perhaps a Wiki page to have people fill cases could be useful
At least now, I see there are 2 versions that require precise tests: Windows 10
Pro
no MSITE issue was created AFAIK
this is classical issue with dependencies: how to clearly show what is fixed by
dependencies and what is fixed directly by the released code
if you have ideas on how to better show this without giving too much work
(abolutely requiring to create one MSITE issue
seems you missed
https://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#dev-env
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Christian Schulte"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Dimanche 13 Novembre 2016 17:56:30
Objet: Releasing
yay!
- Mail original -
De: "Apache Jenkins Server"
À: schu...@apache.org, micha...@apache.org, rfscho...@apache.org,
notificati...@maven.apache.org
Envoyé: Samedi 12 Novembre 2016 21:43:19
Objet: maven-3.x Jigsaw - Build # 10 - Fixed
The Apache Jenkins build
Hi,
We solved 14 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317923=12335570=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
On 2017-12-12 07:11, Chas Honton wrote:
> Pull requests for new project are not sent to the dev mailing list (e.g.
> https://github.com/apache/maven-deploy-plugin/pull/1). Are these PRs
> supposed to be forwarded to some mailing list?
they are sent to iss...@maven.apache.org,
I'd suggest to try the process to a personal personal repo on GitHub to see if
you're able to get a better result before involving manual work from INFRA (on
more than 60 repos...)
(it's sad to see nobody try to explain what's happenning or improve the
documented commands, just get to a
squashed and kept only SHA-512
Maven core plugins don't cover everything even quite generic like creating
checksums, that's why there are many Maven plugins out there...
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Michael Osipov"
À: "Maven Developers List" , "her
Hi,
Recently, Apache distribution policy changed regarding checksums [1]: now,
SHA-256 or SHA-512 checksums are required.
This lead to discussion about changing checksums used on Maven repository
and/or Apache Nexus repository.
But Maven repository requirements and Apache source distribution
ARCHETYPE-554 created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-554
I'll update the version and publish it
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Robert Scholte"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Samedi 11 Août 2018 11:39:59
Objet: Re: archetype-descriptor-1.0.0.xsd outdated
rent demand from ASF we
should consider writing a maven-checksum-plugin.
Robert
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Michael Osipov"
> À: "Maven Developers List" , "herve boutemy"
>
> Cc: release-disc...@apache.org
+1 both for immediate vote and for the plan to release as is then releasing
ASAP 3.5.4
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Mirko Friedenhagen"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Samedi 3 Mars 2018 13:42:43
Objet: Re: [VOTE] Release
the issue is a multi-threading issue on Windows Jansi, then this affects people
on Windows who try to use parallel build.
I can commit on Jansi but not do a release: I can see this if a quick 1.17.1 is
feasible...
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Stephen Connolly"
a dependency has a type, but not really a packaging: a packaging is a recipe to
build a project that will produce multiple artifacts, each with its own type
see the comparison [1]
and default artifact handlers [2] gives you informations about default types.
The only misleading field IMHO is
uh, strange, the test for maven-assembly-plugin is even more aggressive than
maven-source-plugin: the issue should not only happen here
yes, I'm interested in the archive, with details on the OS used
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Tibor Digana"
À: "Maven Developers List" ,
ok, Reproducible Builds are not so easy to get: each plugin that you use can
cause an issue
I really recommend you diffoscope to investigate differences, it really helps a
lot by easily giving you precise differences
Good luck for the investigations :)
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original
issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-574
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Enrico Olivelli"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Cc: "Hervé BOUTEMY"
Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Novembre 2019 09:53:29
Objet: Re: Apache Wagon vs maven-shade vs embedded licenses
Il giorno
sure, if you know how to fix, yes, I can drop this release and start the next
one quickly
particularly if it helps us later to improve Maven handling of the case
This case of -shaded.jar published to Central [1] is really a completely
different scenario than Maven -bin.zip/tar,gz binary
I agree on all points, perfect match :)
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Enrico Olivelli"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Novembre 2019 12:08:11
Objet: Re: Apache Wagon vs maven-shade vs embedded licenses
Il giorno gio 7 nov 2019 alle ore 10:38 ha scritto:
> sure,
MNG-6799 issue created [1]
proposed fix added to the reproducible branch [2] by simply removing the @Named
annotation for the deprecated StringSearchModelInterpolator: CI seems ok
ok for merge?
Regards,
Hervé
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6799
[2]
nobody interested? Or I was too hard on testing reproducibility with JDK 7?
This reproducibility test is just an option, don't hesitate to not test
On next vote, I'll do the release with JDK 8, which will be easier for everyone
to have on his computer...
Regards,
Hervé
On 2019/12/08 23:35:03,
BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 06:27 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2019-12-11T17:58:08+01:00
All its run without problems.
Enrico
Il giorno mer 11 dic 2019 alle ore 17:35 Herve Boutemy
ha scritto:
> nobody interested? Or I was too hard on testing reproducibility with JDK 7?
>
here is my +1
On 2019/10/19 17:40:46, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12345174=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1531/
>
Hi,
the vote passed with the following resuts:
+1: Tibor Digana, Olivier Lamy, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Romain Manni-Bucau,
Sylwester Lachiewicz, Hervé Boutemy
PMC Quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo and complete the procedure
good news: finally, the build is reproducible
there is just a subtle task to do if you build from source-release.zip archive:
start with "rm DEPENDENCIES LICENSE NOTICE"
still need one vote, please
- Mail original -
De: "herve boutemy"
À: "Maven Developer
maven-studies looks like the right location:
https://github.com/apache/maven-studies
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Enrico Olivelli"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Jeudi 30 Janvier 2020 04:31:14
Objet: Re: Maven Runtime Metrics
I sound like to draft a prototype.
Any
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Enrico Olivelli, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Robert
Scholte, Hervé Boutemy
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-
To
+1
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Karl Heinz Marbaise"
À: "Maven Developers List" , "Andreas Dangel"
Envoyé: Lundi 27 Janvier 2020 10:49:32
Objet: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven PMD Plugin version 3.13.0
Hi,
+1 from me.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 25.01.20 12:04,
here is my +1
sadly, the build is not fully reproducible, I'll need to investigate why...
I need more votes, please
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Hervé BOUTEMY"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Dimanche 26 Janvier 2020 01:16:20
Objet: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Parent
see:
- http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.6.3/maven-model/maven.html#class_relocation
- https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html
Everything is there.
I confess I never tried it myself, but there are POMs in central using it.
- Mail original -
De: "Elliotte Rusty Harold"
À:
nothing really went wrong: there are a few cases I did not migrate because I
was convinced that classical migration to 1 git repo each was not appropriate,
but I did not know really what to do better (and was tired doing the migration
on the many "easy" cases)
correponding repositories are
please "git pull": you're one commit behind HEAD
https://github.com/apache/maven-studies/commits/maven-buildinfo-plugin
- Mail original -
De: "Karl Heinz Marbaise"
À: "Maven Developers List" , "Hervé BOUTEMY"
Envoyé: Samedi 7 Mars 2020 12:12:08
Objet: Re: [DISCUSS] checking
Reproducible Builds is now implemented in many plugins: it's time to work on
reproducible war files.
I created MWAR-432 issue and implemented classical Reproducible jar output in
corresponding branch.
But in our discussion in november [1], an issue was reported for unchanged
timestamp in
+1
reproducibility verified: little issue found on source-release.zip, with
strange generated file added, but nothing serious
mvn -Papache-release clean verify buildinfo:save -Dgpg.skip
-Dreference.repo=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1557
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail
"pip install maven" will apparently install https://pypi.org/project/maven/
which is https://github.com/john-sandall/maven
nothing related to the well known Apache Maven build tool
https://maven.apache.org/
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Vikas Mishra"
À: "Maven Developers
Hi,
We solved 4 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318121=12348374=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1593/
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2021/12/22 23:07:27 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122=12351145
>
> There are still a couple of issues
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/01/02 12:48:58 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12349631
>
> There are still a couple of issues
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Michael Osipov"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Dimanche 2 Janvier 2022 11:41:24
Objet: [VOTE] Release Maven Release version 3.0.0-M5
Hi,
We solved 9 issues:
done: https://github.com/apache/maven-build-cache-extension
On 2022/01/04 07:30:40 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'd go for #2 ...
>
> Le mar. 4 janv. 2022 à 00:14, Hervé BOUTEMY a
> écrit :
>
> > yes, I was happy to learn about that shallow + filter approach :)
> >
> > now, we have one choice to
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/01/08 20:24:01 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828=12350622
>
> There are still a couple of issues
having worked on this for the whole WE, please review my last comment in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-384 and associated PR
in short: given Maven classloading, Sonatype plugin cannot be fixed by our
breaking move done in our own plugin in MPLUGIN-377 : in up to us to restore
I rebuilt from current Git HEAD and got same result
looking at ASF Jenkins, it seems 1 configuration has exactly the same issue
than me:
https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-compiler-plugin/job/master/92/execution/node/249/log/
it's JDK 8 with Maven 3.2 on ASF Jenkins,
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo