The central repository shall now contain correct checksums for all 1.8
plexus-compiler* artifacts. Sorry for the trouble.
Milos
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Milos,
I'm not sure if you did the plexus-compiler release in conjunction with
this or if
On 21/04/2010, at 3:40 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the checksums
became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform combo.
I can't recall any problems with the process. I specifically double checked
that there are
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/04/2010, at 3:40 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the
checksums
became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform
combo.
I can't recall
On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc
gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc
both say
gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID B0874707
gpg: Good signature from Milos Kleint mkle...@apache.org
How
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc
gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc
both say
gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID
Brett Porter wrote:
On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc
gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc
both say
gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID
B0874707 gpg: Good signature from Milos Kleint
On 21/04/2010, at 5:59 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc
gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc
both say
gpg: Signature
juven is on the case. We should have correct checksums shortly..
Milos
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/04/2010, at 5:59 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/04/2010, at 5:14
HHi,
This could cause wrong checsums:
Quote from Kevan: Maven 2.2 was used in creating the xbean 3.6 release.
Evidently 2.2 had an issue uploading files to Nexus twice and
calculating checksums on the doubled files.
I think the cause of bad checksum is from using wagon's httpclient
alternative see
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-wagon-providers.html
I attempted to use it to deploy large artifact as a work around for
OOM issue and saw this problem, but could not confirm if my setup is
the problem.
Hi Milos,
I'm not sure if you did the plexus-compiler release in conjunction with this or
if that was someone else, but the checksums for it are incorrect (see users@
today for those using The 2.3 release).
Do you know what happened? If the JARs are correct maybe we can just fix the
checksums
hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the checksums
became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform combo.
I can't recall any problems with the process. I specifically double checked
that there are gpg signatures, but assumed checksums are correct. They
Eh, small correction to that vote
AFAIK I am not on the PMC, so my vote AFAIK is non-binding
-Stephen
On 5 April 2010 19:35, Milos Kleint mkle...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Milos Kleint, Stephen Connolly, John Casey, Nicolas de
Loof,
oups, you are right, sorry about that.
I was checking against
http://people.apache.org/~jim/projects.html#maven-pmc and
your name showed up but I missed that it showed in maven but not maven-pmc.
Same applies to Nicolas.
The correct result is
+1 (binding): Milos Kleint,, John Casey, Olivier Lamy
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Milos Kleint, Stephen Connolly, John Casey, Nicolas de
Loof, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non binding): Tony Chemit
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Milos Kleint
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Milos Kleint
+1
2010/3/30 Milos Kleint mkle...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130version=16097
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-00https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-008/
3
Le Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:54:36 +0200,
Milos Kleint mkle...@gmail.com a écrit :
+1
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130version=16097
Staging repo:
+1
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130version=16097
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-00https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-008/
3
Staging site (sync pending):
+1
2010/4/1 jdca...@mail.commonjava.org
+1
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130version=16097
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-00
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130version=16097
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-00https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-008/
3
Staging site (sync pending):
+1
On 30 March 2010 10:54, Milos Kleint mkle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11130version=16097
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-00
21 matches
Mail list logo
