On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
And thus, what's new ???
3.0.4 is again lost somewhere ...
Mark did you have the opportunity to work on the fix you wanted to ?
The release is still ready to go. I'm not sure where the vote stands on the EPL
licensed 3rd party libraries.
...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2011, 2:21 PM
And thus, what's new ???
3.0.4 is again lost somewhere ...
Mark did you have the opportunity to work on the fix you
wanted to ?
Arnaud
On Fri
to be postponed until we have a clear
understanding how we cope with pom-4.0.1 (use of xml attributes).
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 8/16/11, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers List
And thus, what's new ???
3.0.4 is again lost somewhere ...
Mark did you have the opportunity to work on the fix you wanted to ?
Arnaud
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.frwrote:
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 28 juillet 2011, Brett Porter a écrit :
On
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 28 juillet 2011, Brett Porter a écrit :
On 28/07/2011, at 10:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:25 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
mom jason.
Before we ship 3.0.4 I'd like to fix the SCM URL postfix problem which
exists in lots of DSCMs. Will do
I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this on the
user list later today.
On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Maven PMC,
Benjamin and I would like to make a distribution available that addresses
several issues with the Apache Maven 3.0.3 release. We
mom jason.
Before we ship 3.0.4 I'd like to fix the SCM URL postfix problem which exists
in lots of DSCMs. Will do this in the next week.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:
From: Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven
...@sonatype.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 11:41 AM
I'll assume that this is fine and no
one objects. I'll announce this on the user list later
today.
On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote
On 28/07/2011, at 10:32 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:25 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
mom jason.
Before we ship 3.0.4 I'd like to fix the SCM URL postfix problem which
exists in lots of DSCMs. Will do this in the next week.
You probably have 6-7 weeks before an
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:41:16 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this on the
user list later today.
*THAT* I have a problem with.I don't consider these any different than our
nightly snapshots or a different commercial build of an
version back to the Maven project and
fix the bugs ourself.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:
From: Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:41:16 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this on the
user list later today.
*THAT* I have a problem with.I don't consider these any different than
our
incorporate into an upcoming maven-3.0.4.
3.) We fork the last ALv2 licensed Aether version back to the Maven project
and fix the bugs ourself.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:
From: Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven
provides those.
Also there is still the option to fork it over to apache-extras and fix it
there.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:59:09 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:41:16 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this
on the user list later today.
*THAT* I have a
some thread references?
--benson
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011
) doesn't preclude your participation and we've done nothing to hinder
Kristian or Herve from participating.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:
From: Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not okay to even call the binary
maven-XXX or apache-maven-XXX (unless it's a snapshot) at all without
getting a PMC vote. I thought there were rules in our ASF release
protocols about that.
On 7/28/11 9:18 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2011
On Jul 28, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:59:09 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:41:16 AM Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'll assume that this is fine and no one objects. I'll announce this
on the
We will rebuild it and call it whatever you guys want. I don't know what the
rules are because they always seem to change, or what code has to be in a build
to be called this or that.
In this case we are just like anyone else in the community making a build to
fix problems because there is
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 9:32:07 AM John Casey wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not okay to even call the binary
maven-XXX or apache-maven-XXX (unless it's a snapshot) at all without
getting a PMC vote. I thought there were rules in our ASF release
protocols about that.
That's
On Jul 28, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
At the end of the day, if you really cared about the Maven users, you'd help
us get an official Apache version of 3.0.4 out. The fact that you are
unwilling to do what is necessary to make that happen is very frustrating to
me.
How
our control anymore!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:
From: Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 1:23 PM
On Jul 28, 2011
From my POV it could be a good thing for users to at least push a 3.0.4
release with what Benj fixed.
If Mark is sure to be able to fix next week the bug he mentioned let's wait
him.
For Aether/Sisu and additional fixes and required dependencies I let others
active dev/pmcs decide what they want.
perfectly fine with me.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 2:27 PM
From my
,
but because the code is not under our control anymore!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zylja...@sonatype.com wrote:
From: Jason van Zylja...@sonatype.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers Listdev@maven.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011
+1
Can bentmann's fixes be applied without adopting the updated version of
Aether?
On 7/28/11 10:27 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
From my POV it could be a good thing for users to at least push a 3.0.4
release with what Benj fixed.
If Mark is sure to be able to fix next week the bug he
://github.com/sonatype/m2eclipse-egit/blob/master/org.sonatype.m2e.egit.target-platform/e37.target
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:
From: Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers List dev
:
From: Jason van Zylja...@sonatype.com
Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
To: Maven Developers Listdev@maven.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 1:23 PM
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Humm, guess there are only 3 options left in this
case
1.) We wait 7
On 28 July 2011 16:03, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
On 7/28/11 10:43 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
The reason why no one committed to Aether beside yourself is partly that
it requires to sign some CLA which only unilaterally grants
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 July 2011 16:03, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
On 7/28/11 10:43 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
The reason why no one committed to Aether
Not sure what version you're reading but we specifically changed so that said
author retains copyright and Sonatype is granted a perpetual license. Changed
specifically when Brett brought it up, we brought it in line with what Apache
and Eclipse do.
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Stephen
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:03 AM, John Casey wrote:
On 7/28/11 10:43 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
The reason why no one committed to Aether beside yourself is partly that it
requires to sign some CLA which only unilaterally grants rights
On 28 July 2011 16:18, Milos Kleint mkle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 July 2011 16:03, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
On 7/28/11 10:43 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Mark
Maven PMC,
Benjamin and I would like to make a distribution available that addresses
several issues with the Apache Maven 3.0.3 release. We have pushed back all
bugfixes that do not involve Eclipse Aether[a] and Eclipse Sisu[b] as their
incorporation into the mainline and an official release
35 matches
Mail list logo
