On April 11, 2015, 4:11 a.m., Adam B wrote:
Did you ever (manually?) Test for upgrade path?
Sorry for not replying earlier. I tested manually with 0.22.0 and HEAD. I tried
combinations of old/new pairs of master, slave and test-framework. I also tried
Niklas's upgrade script
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32583/#review79798
---
Ship it!
Did you ever (manually?) Test for upgrade path?
- Adam B
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32583/#review79142
---
src/slave/slave.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32583/
---
(Updated April 7, 2015, 12:59 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and
On April 7, 2015, 4:06 a.m., Adam B wrote:
src/slave/slave.cpp, line 1108
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32583/diff/4/?file=914631#file914631line1108
If we're always making the copy, should we just pass `frameworkInfo_`
by value and force the copy at the call-site? Then there's no
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32583/
---
(Updated April 3, 2015, 10:05 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32583/#review78704
---
src/messages/messages.proto
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32583/#review78494
---
Should mention in the Description (commit message) that the new
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32583/
---
(Updated April 1, 2015, 3:34 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Niklas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32583/
---
(Updated March 31, 2015, 4:28 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and
10 matches
Mail list logo
