Hah, here it is: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/743
“This problem seems to only reproduce when one unrolls a tarball rather than
cloning from github.”
Heh, the exclusion at https://github.com/apache/metron/blob/master/pom.xml#L351
is still there, but the hashcode in the bundle.css file
I remember having trouble with this bundle.css file on the last release, but I
can’t remember what we did about it. Anybody?
On 12/8/17, 1:41 PM, "Otto Fowler" wrote:
Steps
- Downloaded tar.gz’s, asc files and KEYS
- Verified signing of both
Steps
- Downloaded tar.gz’s, asc files and KEYS
- Verified signing of both tar.gz’s
- searched for rouge 0.4.1 entries
- verified the main pom.xml
- built :
mvn clean && time mvn -q -T 2C -DskipTests install && time mvn -q -T
2C surefire:test@unit-tests && time mvn -q
I poked around the RC briefly and spun up full dev with and without
sensors, no issues so far.
Jon
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:34 AM Matt Foley wrote:
> Colleagues,
> I’ve posted Metron-0.4.2-RC1 and Metron-bro-plugin-kafka-0.1 to
>
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/861
I ran the following test:
Modified the default snort parser configuration such that it was :
```json
{
Github user simonellistonball commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/861
Good catch, my test included the source.type in the select list, and
generalised badly in the instructions. We should include the source.type in the
protected system fields, let me update
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/858
I created a feature branch called "feature/METRON-1344-test-infrastructure"
and switched the base of this PR to that instead of master. What is the next
step?
---
I seem to be beyond the issue now. But the question I have is this… do we
required internet connectivity to build rpms now?
On December 8, 2017 at 07:14:41, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com)
wrote:
I’m getting errors building rpms, but not building the rest of the product
( so vagrant up
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/859
Good catch @mmiklavc. Would be nice to get that added to the blueprint so
it just happens.
---
Github user simonellistonball commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/861
Actually, to follow up on that... I have a proxy feed, and some proxy use
cases (enrichment, profile, etc). I want to keep my data clean and be explicit
about which fields I pass on, so I
Github user simonellistonball commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/861
If they want to select most, and remove the ones they don't want, then I
would recommend using the remove transformation, or a set null in stellar.
Perhaps regex support might be a nice
GitHub user ottobackwards reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/856
METRON-1339 Stellar Shell functionality to verify stored stellar statements
This will allow users to check their deployed statements, say after
upgrade, when they are at rest ( and would
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/856
Closing to test build in travis
---
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/856
Bump?
---
Github user ottobackwards closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/856
---
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/861
I trying to run this up in full dev. I have two issues:
1. expressJS is failing download, obviously outside this PR
2. The usability of this transform. If a user just wants a
I’m getting errors building rpms, but not building the rest of the product
( so vagrant up makes it to the rpm phase ).
When I just build the rpms from the cli I get:
+ npm install
--prefix=/root/BUILDROOT/metron-0.4.2-root/usr/metron/0.4.2/web/expressjs
--only=production
npm ERR! Linux
Colleagues,
I’ve posted Metron-0.4.2-RC1 and Metron-bro-plugin-kafka-0.1 to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/metron/0.4.2-RC1/
Given the complexity of this RC, I’d appreciate if a couple people would be
willing to kick the tires before we put it up for a vote.
I will myself be going thru
18 matches
Mail list logo