Re: [DISCUSS] METRON-777 and the road to perditi... er enlightenment

2017-08-28 Thread Otto Fowler
Does anyone have any preference wrt squashing the initial PR? It obviously has a log of commits etc, I would prefer to squash it and clean everything up. On August 25, 2017 at 13:26:04, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: Does anyone else have any comments? I would like to get the bal

Re: [DISCUSS] METRON-777 and the road to perditi... er enlightenment

2017-08-25 Thread Otto Fowler
Does anyone else have any comments? I would like to get the ball rolling on this, maybe this weekend. On August 23, 2017 at 14:28:57, Nick Allen (n...@nickallen.org) wrote: I propose that we go forward with our first feature branch without guideline changes up-front. We can use this as a learn

Re: [DISCUSS] METRON-777 and the road to perditi... er enlightenment

2017-08-23 Thread Nick Allen
I propose that we go forward with our first feature branch without guideline changes up-front. We can use this as a learning experience out of which guideline changes can be proposed. I'd prefer to have a little more flexibility on our first feature branch so we can determine how best to push it

Re: [DISCUSS] METRON-777 and the road to perditi... er enlightenment

2017-08-23 Thread zeo...@gmail.com
This is all great stuff. As far as feature branch naming, I would suggest something like feature/$brief_explanation accompanied with a feature branch JIRA that explains the original intent of the branch and its goals/"complete" indicators. Along the lines of the FEATURE.md, I feel like at the ver

Re: [DISCUSS] METRON-777 and the road to perditi... er enlightenment

2017-08-23 Thread Nick Allen
+1 I like it all, Otto. You deserve a freakin' medal. On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:04 AM Otto Fowler wrote: > WRT : regression fixes, I would also like us to consider putting these the > initial 777 to feature branch PR as an option. > > > On August 23, 2017 at 09:56:33, Otto Fowler (ottoback

Re: [DISCUSS] METRON-777 and the road to perditi... er enlightenment

2017-08-23 Thread Otto Fowler
WRT : regression fixes, I would also like us to consider putting these the initial 777 to feature branch PR as an option. On August 23, 2017 at 09:56:33, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: A feature branch As discussed in the community meeting we are going to create a ‘feature’ bran

[DISCUSS] METRON-777 and the road to perditi... er enlightenment

2017-08-23 Thread Otto Fowler
A feature branch As discussed in the community meeting we are going to create a ‘feature’ branch for METRON–777 and it’s associated PR’s. The purpose behind the feature branch is to more formally stage a large PR or set of PR’s to allow for for better review participation ( of the pr and changes d