Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Solr

I'm +1 on feature branch and user@ announcement as well. On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Casey Stella wrote: > +1 to both the feature branch and user@ announcement. > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Otto Fowler > wrote: > > > +1 to the feature

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Solr

+1 to both the feature branch and user@ announcement. On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Otto Fowler wrote: > +1 to the feature branch. > > Also, there have been some questions about solr support recently, I think > when the feature branch > is ready you should announce

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Solr

+1 to the feature branch. Also, there have been some questions about solr support recently, I think when the feature branch is ready you should announce it on user@ too, we may get some help from folks looking for this. On January 18, 2018 at 14:26:14, Justin Leet (justinjl...@gmail.com)

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Solr

+1 to a feature branch for this. I like that approach Justin. On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:26 PM Justin Leet wrote: > Now that we have ES at a modern version, we should consider bringing Solr > to a modern version as well. > > The focus of this work would be to get us in a

[DISCUSS] Upgrading Solr

Now that we have ES at a modern version, we should consider bringing Solr to a modern version as well. The focus of this work would be to get us in a place where Solr is upgraded, along with the related work of building out the Solr functionality to parity with Elasticsearch. The goal would not