Re: Parser Docs

2017-05-11 Thread Simon Elliston Ball
e Rijk >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> > On 9 May 2017, at 02:23, Otto Fowler >> > <mailto:ottobackwa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > There is a readme.md <http://re

Re: Parser Docs

2017-05-11 Thread Otto Fowler
er in 777. > I only stubbed them out however. > > Each parser created by the archetype has one as well. > > What I was hoping to do was to include the parser docs in the package assembly so the UI could load it. > > > > On May 8, 2017 at 19:35:41, Simon Elliston Ball

Re: Parser Docs

2017-05-11 Thread Otto Fowler
iPhone > On 9 May 2017, at 02:23, Otto Fowler wrote: > > There is a readme.md PER parser in 777. > I only stubbed them out however. > > Each parser created by the archetype has one as well. > > What I was hoping to do was to include the parser docs in the package assembly

Re: Parser Docs

2017-05-11 Thread Simon Elliston Ball
gt; >> On 9 May 2017, at 02:23, Otto Fowler wrote: >> >> There is a readme.md PER parser in 777. >> I only stubbed them out however. >> >> Each parser created by the archetype has one as well. >> >> What I was hoping to do was to include the parser docs in

Re: Parser Docs

2017-05-11 Thread Mark de Rijk
Rijk Sent from my iPhone > On 9 May 2017, at 02:23, Otto Fowler wrote: > > There is a readme.md PER parser in 777. > I only stubbed them out however. > > Each parser created by the archetype has one as well. > > What I was hoping to do was to include the pa

Re: Parser Docs

2017-05-08 Thread Otto Fowler
. What I was hoping to do was to include the parser docs in the package assembly so the UI could load it. On May 8, 2017 at 19:35:41, Simon Elliston Ball (si...@simonellistonball.com) wrote: Quick thought, and please shoot me down if this has already been thought of, but…. Would it be

Re: Parser Docs

2017-05-08 Thread Otto Fowler
There is a readme.md PER parser in 777. I only stubbed them out however. Each parser created by the archetype has one as well. What I was hoping to do was to include the parser docs in the package assembly so the UI could load it. On May 8, 2017 at 19:35:41, Simon Elliston Ball (si

Re: Parser Docs

2017-05-08 Thread zeo...@gmail.com
Casey Stella wrote: > +1 for parser docs > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Simon Elliston Ball < > si...@simonellistonball.com> wrote: > > > Quick thought, and please shoot me down if this has already been thought > > of, but…. > > > > Would it be wort

Re: Parser Docs

2017-05-08 Thread Casey Stella
+1 for parser docs On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Simon Elliston Ball < si...@simonellistonball.com> wrote: > Quick thought, and please shoot me down if this has already been thought > of, but…. > > Would it be worthwhile if we put some per parser docs into the repo, > es

Parser Docs

2017-05-08 Thread Simon Elliston Ball
Quick thought, and please shoot me down if this has already been thought of, but…. Would it be worthwhile if we put some per parser docs into the repo, essentially a README.md per major parser class, which would in theory be picked up by the docbook? We don’t really have much documentation