On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jon Folland, Nativ Ltd
wrote:
> 1. Is there any reason why the FTPServer project does not support Socket and
> ServerSocket Factories in the DataConnection classes? The reason I ask is we
> would like to specify a different concrete
> implementation of the Java S
Yes, please! Red5 would love an RC! :)
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Ashish wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Julien Vermillard
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Look like we are not receiving much bug reports on the last release.
> >
> > The only bug I can see is
> > https://issues.apache.or
Hi Sai,
Thanks for this. The strategy in point one is the one we followed and it works.
The only reason I requested factories is to save a lot of cut of paste of
perfectly good code. But this will suffice, so thanks for your help.
Regarding point 2, thanks very much for this also.
Regards,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
boB Gage closed DIRMINA-740.
Verified. Julien's fix has fixed the Linux hardware flow control symptom
completely.
THANKS!!
> Serial Har
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julien Vermillard resolved DIRMINA-740.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Julien Vermillard
> Serial Hardware Flow Control i
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Look like we are not receiving much bug reports on the last release.
>
> The only bug I can see is
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-679
> and it's not really easy to reproduce. I think it's the result of some
> kind
I think #1 is kind of available. The data connection handling is
defined by the interface ServerDataConnectionFactory. The current
version ships the default implementation in IODataConnectionFactory.
It appears that you can substitute your own implemenation of
ServerDataConnectionFactory by setting
Le Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:06:32 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit :
> Julien Vermillard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Look like we are not receiving much bug reports on the last release.
> >
> > The only bug I can see is
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-679
> > and it's not really easy to r
Hi,
1. Is there any reason why the FTPServer project does not support Socket and
ServerSocket Factories in the DataConnection classes? The reason I ask is we
would like to specify a different concrete implementation of the Java Socket
and ServerSocket classes without changing the code base. I
Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
Look like we are not receiving much bug reports on the last release.
The only bug I can see is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-679
and it's not really easy to reproduce. I think it's the result of some
kind of strange executor filter combination.
Pers
I kill it today ;)
need to be done before any RC release
Le Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:13:05 + (GMT),
Edouard De Oliveira a écrit :
>
> I remember there was a previous discution thread which seemed to get
> to a consensus on getting rid of it no ?
> Cordialement, Regards,
> -Edouard De Oliveira
Hi,
Look like we are not receiving much bug reports on the last release.
The only bug I can see is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-679
and it's not really easy to reproduce. I think it's the result of some
kind of strange executor filter combination.
Personally I'm running M7 in pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764656#action_12764656
]
Julien Vermillard commented on DIRMINA-679:
---
Can we have some test case ? I can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764654#action_12764654
]
Julien Vermillard commented on DIRMINA-679:
---
Look like the problem is due to the
Look like only
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-679
is remaining.
Let's fix it if possible quickly and release RC1
WDYT ?
Julien
Le Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:52:22 +0200,
Julien Vermillard a écrit :
> Le Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:30:05 +0200,
> Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit :
>
> > Julien Ve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764636#action_12764636
]
Julien Vermillard commented on DIRMINA-714:
---
syncronizing the session.write(...)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julien Vermillard resolved DIRMINA-714.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Julien Vermillard (was: Edouard De Oliveira)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764634#action_12764634
]
Julien Vermillard commented on DIRMINA-714:
---
public static int generateSeq(D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julien Vermillard updated DIRMINA-734:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: Just a quick obvious tip :
use an AtomicInteger for generat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764632#action_12764632
]
Julien Vermillard edited comment on DIRMINA-734 at 10/12/09 2:52 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764632#action_12764632
]
Julien Vermillard commented on DIRMINA-734:
---
Just a quick obvious tip :
use an A
21 matches
Mail list logo
