Re: Two questions on Apache Mina FTPServer

2009-10-12 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jon Folland, Nativ Ltd wrote: > 1. Is there any reason why the FTPServer project does not support Socket and > ServerSocket Factories in the DataConnection classes? The reason I ask is we > would like to specify a different concrete > implementation of the Java S

Re: Two questions on Apache Mina FTPServer

2009-10-12 Thread Jon Folland, Nativ Ltd
, Jon. - Original Message - From: "Sai Pullabhotla" To: dev@mina.apache.org Sent: Monday, 12 October, 2009 1:30:56 PM Subject: Re: Two questions on Apache Mina FTPServer I think #1 is kind of available. The data connection handling is defined by the

Re: Two questions on Apache Mina FTPServer

2009-10-12 Thread Sai Pullabhotla
I think #1 is kind of available. The data connection handling is defined by the interface ServerDataConnectionFactory. The current version ships the default implementation in IODataConnectionFactory. It appears that you can substitute your own implemenation of ServerDataConnectionFactory by setting

Two questions on Apache Mina FTPServer

2009-10-12 Thread Jon Folland, Nativ Ltd
Hi, 1. Is there any reason why the FTPServer project does not support Socket and ServerSocket Factories in the DataConnection classes? The reason I ask is we would like to specify a different concrete implementation of the Java Socket and ServerSocket classes without changing the code base. I