Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-19 Thread Piyush Ghai
Hi all, I’m happy to announce the results of the vote. This vote passes with 7 +1 votes (4 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes Carin / binding Sheng / binding Indhu / binding Haibin / binding Qing Roshani Yuxi Hu 0 Votes No votes -1 Votes No votes Vote thread can be found here [1].

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-19 Thread Indhu
+1 Built from source. Verified distributed training of Resnet50 works fine. On Tue, Feb 19, 2019, 11:43 AM Sheng Zha -[Y] Are release files in correct location? > -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name? > -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct? > -[Y] Does

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-19 Thread Sheng Zha
-[Y] Are release files in correct location? -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name? -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct? -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist? -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists? -[Y] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? -[N] Is the NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-19 Thread Haibin Lin
+1 Built from source on Ubuntu and it passed kvstore unit tests. Best, Haibin On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:03 AM Piyush Ghai wrote: > Hi all, > > I still need more votes from PMC members in order to conclude this vote. > > PMC members, please TEST and vote accordingly. Your votes will help us >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-19 Thread Piyush Ghai
Hi all, I still need more votes from PMC members in order to conclude this vote. PMC members, please TEST and vote accordingly. Your votes will help us release MXNet version soon. I’m extending the voting thread until Feb 20th 12 AM PST. Best regards, Piyush On 2019/02/16 02:01:25,

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-19 Thread Piyush Ghai
Hi all, There’s a small clarification. I was just made aware that only PMC members have binding votes. So I’m nullifying this result as for now. As per the PMC criteria, I still need at least 2 more votes from PMC members. I’ll update this thread when I have sufficient number of votes from

[RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-19 Thread Piyush Ghai
Dear MXNet community, I’m happy to announce the results of the vote. This vote passes with 4 +1 votes (3 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes Carin / binding Qing / binding Roshani / binding Yuxi Hu 0 Votes No votes -1 Votes No votes Vote thread can be found here [1]. I will continue

Re: Rust Client Lib

2019-02-19 Thread Pedro Larroy
Relevant to this conversation about Rust / Swift bindings, is this recent interview with Yann LeCun which I think hits the nail in the head: https://venturebeat.com/2019/02/18/facebooks-chief-ai-scientist-deep-learning-may-need-a-new-programming-language/amp/ The questions are, do people /

答复: [Announcement] New Committer - Kan Wu (@wkcn)

2019-02-19 Thread MiraiWK WKCN
I am happy and honored to be a MXNet committer. It's a pleasure to cooperate with you, and contribute to MXNet together. Thanks, Kan Wu 发件人: Zhao, Patric 发送时间: 2019年2月19日 14:24 收件人: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; d...@mxnet.apache.org 抄送: Anirudh Subramanian;