Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership

+1 (binding) On 05.11.18 11:29, Carin Meier wrote: This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered as both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to change that to be able to

Re: [VOTE] - Adopt "Become a Committer and PPMC Member" Document

+1 (binding) On 30.10.18 12:37, Steffen Rochel wrote: +1 non-binding Thanks for driving the vote Carin! On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:31 AM Carin Meier wrote: Sure PPMC stands for Podling Project Management Committee - https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html - I updated the document to

Re: Enable Travis CI for Apache MXNet

Done, here is the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17004 On 10.09.2018 14:49, Marco de Abreu wrote: Hello Sebastian, could you please file a ticket with Apache Infra to enable Travis CI for our main repository? The discussion thread is available at https://lists.apache.org

Re: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mxnet.html updated

wrote: I would like to thank Sebastian for his help to update http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mxnet.html Please have a look and let me know if you see errors, omissions or other needs for improvement. Regards, Steffen . On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:49 AM Steffen Rochel wrote: http

Ticket for github bot account

Hi, I created the INFRA ticket for the bot account here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16884 Best, Sebastian

Re: users@mxnet

swering users' >>>>> questions. >>>>>> But the topics discussed there may not be of the interest for pure >>>>>> development purposes. Some discussions will jump from users@ to dev@, >>>>> but >>>>&

Re: About Becoming a Committer

On 16.06.2018 10:57, Pedro Larroy wrote: Hi Sebastian. Thank you for your comment. That's why I said "I would propose", because I don't know if it's possible as my experience with Apache is limited to the MXNet project. How do you interpret this part?: "Since the appointed Pro

Re: About Becoming a Committer

I would propose the two following action points: * Resetting the list of committers to people that have contributed in the previous terms in the latest 6 months * Suspend veto rights temporarily and use simple majority for decisions that need a vote so we realign the project with the

Re: users@mxnet

I have already proposed this many times in the past and would strongly encourage it. -s On 15.06.2018 21:56, Sergio Fernández wrote: Hi, is there any good reason why the podling doesn't have a users@ mailing list yet? Honestly speaking, I'm not a big fan of the other tools the podling is

"What does the Apache board do"

views, especially for the MXNet community: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jm_whow_zxk Best, Sebastian

Re: Vote to stop using JIRA

Looks like they also don't handle the committer nomination process correctly ... "If you are interested in becoming a Weex committer, contact any existing committer and we will help you go through the invitation process." On 11.06.2018 05:31, Yasser Zamani wrote: On 6/10/2018 4:53 AM,

Re: Permission to delete tasks on MXNET Jira

I deleted the respective tasks. On 25.05.2018 18:31, Alex Zai wrote: Hello, I recently created a few tasks (Task MXNET-461 to MXNET-469) in the MXNet Jira page ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=211=MXNET). It was intended to be created as a subtask under

Re: blog for MXNet

/#!forum/data-vis-jobs that's very community friendly and is a good place for people to gather to see job needs. All the best Sebastian Gutierrez On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:10 PM Thomas DELTEIL <thomas.delte...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Aaron, I like medium, a lot of projects seems to b

fyi: deep learning framework mentions on arXiv over the past 3 months

https://twitter.com/fchollet/status/971863128341323776

Re: Regarding joining slack channel

It took us quite some effort to move everyone to the ASF supported slack channel, so I don't see the point of moving away from that. -s On 15.02.2018 13:26, Pedro Larroy wrote: What's the situation with slack vs gitter? Should we just move all the discussion to gitter? there was never any

Re: Module maintainers proposal

+1 2018-01-16 9:08 GMT+01:00 Isabel Drost-Fromm : > Hi, > > > > Am 16. Januar 2018 01:40:48 MEZ schrieb Steffen Rochel < > steffenroc...@gmail.com>: > ># Anybody can add themselves or a team as additional contributors > ># to get notified about changes in a specific package. >

Infra ticket created for switching the PR validation strategy

FYI: I created a ticket for infra to switch the pr validation strategy as decided upon in https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b0d3ef47c3c9e67b2c99f2bea089ad3879fc523657cab676e5ff891@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15833 Best, Sebastian

Re: Podling Report Reminder - January 2018

done. On 01.01.2018 03:51, Markus Weimer wrote: Done. -- Markus On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: Report's been filed - mentors please comment and sign-off On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: I'll post the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet(incubating) version 1.0.0.rc0

+1 (binding) verified signature, verified building from source On 25.11.2017 01:00, Chris Olivier wrote: This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.0.0. Voting will start now (Friday, November 24, 2017) and will remain open for 72 hours. Link to release notes:

Re: [VOTE] A Separate CI System for Apache MXNet (incubating)

+1 for 1) (binding) On 10.11.2017 10:30, kellen sunderland wrote: +1 for 1 (non-binding) On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 6:37 AM, Chris Olivier wrote: +1 for 1) — Jenkins On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:14 PM Naveen Swamy wrote: +1 on 1) On Nov 9, 2017,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet(incubating) version 0.12.1.rc0

+1 (binding) verified signature, built from source. On 08.11.2017 04:51, Chris Olivier wrote: +1 Binding On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:48 PM Meghna Baijal wrote: This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 0.12.1. Voting will start now (Tuesday,

Re: mxnet slack channel request

Invite sent. On 06.11.2017 06:25, Jeongyeol Choe wrote: Hi, I've just subscribed mxnet. Then I am willing to join mxnet slack channel. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Jeongyeol

Re: Grant access to slack

Hi Matthias, Channels of interest for you might be #mxnet and #mxnet-builds. Best, Sebastian 2017-11-01 17:20 GMT+01:00 Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com>: > Invite sent > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Nov 1, 2017, at 6:17 PM, Matthias Seeger <msee...@gmai

Re: Draft of blog post for MXNet v0.12 release

should be "allowing developers to". Best, Sebastian On 01.11.2017 01:27, sandeep krishnamurthy wrote: Thank you, Henry, for the help. Regards, Sandeep On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Hen <bay...@apache.org> wrote: It was noted that you've signed up. I've added you to the bl

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) Version 0.12.0.rc0

There was also a binding +1 from me :) On 28.10.2017 23:08, Zha, Sheng wrote: Who’s executing? Best regards, -sz On 10/24/17, 4:50 PM, "Meghna Baijal" wrote: Hi All, The vote for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0 RC0 passed with the

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 0.12.0.rc0

ubuntu instance this time. Worked without the ‘g’ sha512sum --check ./apache-mxnet-src-0.12.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz.sha512 On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Sebastian <ssc.o...@googlemail.com> wrote: Hmm, still doesn't work. Looks like the download of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/inc

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 0.12.0.rc0

:01, Meghna Baijal wrote: Hi Sebastian, Can you try the following: gsha512sum --check ./apache-mxnet-src-0.12.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz.sha512 This worked for me. Thanks, Meghna Baijal On Oct 20, 2017 9:53 PM, "Sebastian" <ssc.o...@googlemail.com> wrote: Verifying the sha512

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 0.12.0.rc0

Verifying the sha512 sig didn't work for me, what am I doing wrong here? sha512sum -c apache-mxnet-src-0.12.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz.sha512 sha512sum: apache-mxnet-src-0.12.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz.sha512: no properly formatted SHA512 checksum lines found On 21.10.2017 02:36, Suneel Marthi

Re: Request for suggestions- Supporting onnx in mxnet

One solution: The MXNet community forks the DMLC code it relies on into the MXNet codebase and moves on without being tied down by the decisions of a non-compatible community. +1 had a similar impression while following this discussion. -s

Re: PROCESS: Contacting the Apache Infra team

I'm happy to help out with filing INFRA tickets for anyone working in a European time zone. Best, Sebastian On 06.10.2017 07:13, Henri Yandell wrote: Hi Apache MXNet Committers and Contributors, As a community we've been sending a lot of requests (JIRA, HipChat etc) in the direction

Re: Formalize Committer Proposal and Application Procedure

and processes in a project. Best, Sebastian

Why its a good idea to move to your own infrastructure

-takedown-a-post-mortem.html Best, Sebastian

Re: Podling Report Reminder - July 2017

Also signed off! On 06.07.2017 00:34, Markus Weimer wrote: On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: Thanks Dom, the report has been filed. Mentors, please sign-off on the report. Thanks and done! Markus

Re: Granting access to Jenkins

I confirmed your subscription to the private@ list, so 3) shoudl already be done :) Best, Sebastian On 27.06.2017 23:02, Ly Nguyen wrote: Now that I'm a committer and have an account (thanks all!) I still need the following to move migration forward: 1) Grant me access to Jenkins: https

Typo in the documentation

] fc1_weight[cpu] -= lr * fc1_wgrad[gpu0] fc2_weight[cpu] -= lr * fc2_wgrad[gpu0] I think the last two lines should refer to the weights on the 'cpu' instead of weights on 'gpu0', and these wrong lines have also been copied to the picture below the code. Best, Sebastian

Re: [Vote] New MXNet Logo

On 05.03.2017 16:23, Spisak, Joseph wrote: Talking to me? Name is Joe.. :). Let's run for 3days and then close. Oops, yes Joe not John, sorry for that :) Sent from Joe's iPhone On Mar 5, 2017, at 12:11 AM, Sebastian <s...@apache.org> wrote: Dear John, I would kindly ask you to s

Re: Draft of March 2016 Podling Report

] Community building [ ] Nearing graduation [ ] Other: Date of last release: No release yet When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? Project is being established with initial set of committers. Signed-off-by: [ ](mxnet) Sebastian Schelter Comments: [ ](mxnet) S