Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-28 Thread Anirudh
Hi, I have opened a PR for adding new content to 1.2.1 release notes: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11478 Please help review. Once this PR is approved I will be cutting the release. Thanks, Anirudh On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Chris Olivier wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-26 Thread Chris Olivier
+1 On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:50 PM Anirudh wrote: > Hi all, > > The current warning message for save_params: "save_params is deprecated, > use save_parameters instead" is misleading > for users who may use the API to load into SymbolBlock. To make it clearer > for all users, a better warning

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-26 Thread Anirudh
Hi all, The current warning message for save_params: "save_params is deprecated, use save_parameters instead" is misleading for users who may use the API to load into SymbolBlock. To make it clearer for all users, a better warning message is to include alternative to save_params and reference to

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-25 Thread Mu Li
Detailed documents should help, but the current warning message that "save_params is deprecated, use save_parameters instead" is not sufficient enough. Some details about the API changes: 1. v1.2 changed the implementation of "save_params", which is explained in the release note. The main

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-25 Thread Sheng Zha
Wouldn’t this break users who are on 1.2.0 and used our API correctly? Why do we have to revert load_params, given that it’s backward compatible? -sz > On Jun 25, 2018, at 6:30 PM, Anirudh wrote: > > Hi, > > 1.2.1 (load_params) is backward compatible with 1.1.0 not with 1.2.0. > It does not

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-25 Thread Sheng Zha
save_parameters didn't exist in 1.2.0 so its addition usually isn't supposed to happen in a patch release if we stick to semantic versioning. I couldn't find a discussion on this exception. Did it happen? Would people who used 1.2.0 to save models be able to load parameters in 1.2.1 using the

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-25 Thread Anirudh
Hi Mu, The warining currently printed is "save_params is deprecated. Please use save_parameters." Isn't this similar to what you are suggesting ? Anirudh On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Mu Li wrote: > v1.2.1 will print a deprecating warning message when calling > save_params. We should tell

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-25 Thread Mu Li
v1.2.1 will print a deprecating warning message when calling save_params. We should tell users clearly to replace "save_params" with "save_parameters" or something else. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Anirudh wrote: > Hi, > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-22 Thread Anirudh
Hi all, Thanks a lot for checking the release. This vote has passed with: 6 +1s Binding: Sandeep Haibin Indhu Non Binding: Carin Pedro Lai Anirudh On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:00 AM, sandeep krishnamurthy < sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Lai (https://github.com/roywei) and

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-22 Thread Anirudh
Hi all, Thanks for checking the release. We need one more binding +1. I would request committers to help out here so that we can get the vote started on general@. Anirudh On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Pedro Larroy wrote: > I already changed my vote to +1 I don't think this a big issue,

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Pedro Larroy
I already changed my vote to +1 I don't think this a big issue, just a pixel difference of 1 when loading an image. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:20 PM Marco de Abreu wrote: > We had 868 successful runs and no failures for that test so far, Pedro. > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:17 PM Pedro

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Carin Meier
+1 I tested the Scala jars (through the clojure package) on staging on for the various platforms and they look good. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Anirudh wrote: > That looks like a flaky test because of atol being too small. please force > rtol and atol values and see if you are still able

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Anirudh
That looks like a flaky test because of atol being too small. please force rtol and atol values and see if you are still able to reproduce. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Pedro Larroy wrote: > Observed just one failure in OSX in test_imdecode: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Marco de Abreu
We had 868 successful runs and no failures for that test so far, Pedro. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:17 PM Pedro Larroy wrote: > Observed just one failure in OSX in test_imdecode: > > > == > FAIL: test_imdecode

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Pedro Larroy
Observed just one failure in OSX in test_imdecode: == FAIL: test_imdecode (test_image.TestImage) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Haibin Lin
+1 Built from source with CUDA on Ubuntu. Ran example/gluon/word_language_model/train.py Best, Haibin On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Anirudh wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > I think you raised this issue in 1.2.0 release here: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddc088a21aac179144350ea97353a7 >

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Pedro Larroy
I guess that's why I disable openmp for development, so given that it's a known issue an the unit tests passed on osx I change my vote accordingly to +1 not to block the release. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:52 PM Anirudh wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > I have seen this with the DEBUG flag on, not without

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Anirudh
Hi Pedro, I have seen this with the DEBUG flag on, not without it. I opened an issue here some time back: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10856 Anirudh On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Pedro Larroy wrote: > Got it. Sorry to bring this up, and the deja-vu :-) . Makes sense

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Pedro Larroy
Got it. Sorry to bring this up, and the deja-vu :-) . Makes sense not to consider this issue again as you suggested, thanks. I compiled in OSX and run unit tests. Also run SSD detector and is working fine. Compiled in ubuntu / cpu / debug with openmp. And run unit tests. I have the following

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Anirudh
Hi Pedro, I think you raised this issue in 1.2.0 release here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddc088a21aac179144350ea97353a7ea885b2765ccb98db08a03ba2d@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E . I actually forgot about this issue during this release. Having said that, I think since this works with make

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-21 Thread Pedro Larroy
I think I have fixed this before, I will check if the patch didn't make it to the branch. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:24 AM Pedro Larroy wrote: > -1 I can't compile: > > 3rdparty/dmlc-core/libdmlc.a(io.cc.o): In function > `std::thread::thread::Init(std::function

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

2018-06-20 Thread Indhu
+1 On Mon, Jun 18, 2018, 6:52 PM Anirudh wrote: > Hi, > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.2.1. Voting > will start now and close Thursday June 21st 7:00 PM PDT. > > Link to release candidate 1.2.1.rc0: > >