Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0.RC0

Actually, the command "git clone --recursive https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet -b 1.3.0.rc0" works fine now, never mind. On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM Philip Cho wrote: > Unfortunately, MXNet was depending on a branch of TVM that is now deleted. > We will have to merge #12448 >

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0.RC0

Unfortunately, MXNet was depending on a branch of TVM that is now deleted. We will have to merge #12448 before the release. Background: See dmlc/tvm#1394 . Philip. On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:26 AM

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.3.0.RC0

Checked out the tag, built and tested the Clojure package. +1 On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:59 PM Roshani Nagmote wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version > 1.3.0.RC0. Voting will start now (Friday, Aug 31st) and end at 7:00 PM > PDT,

Re: Propose to discontinue supporting Apache MXNet on Windows 7

The known problem with Win7 now is https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/9271. Because I've upgraded Win10, so I can't reproduce this problem, and I can't solve it. I am not sure whether the problem has been solved now. I am sorry about this shiwen hu 于2018年9月3日周一 下午7:43写道： > At

Re: Propose to discontinue supporting Apache MXNet on Windows 7

At present, all precompiled packages are win10-compiled. There are no large-scale reports that can no run win7. Therefore, there is no problem for all precompiled package users to stop or continue supporting. Timur Shenkao 于2018年9月3日周一 下午5:14写道： > Users live like you described: install mxnet,

Re: Propose to discontinue supporting Apache MXNet on Windows 7

Users live like you described: install mxnet, then import fails, switch to TF or Pytorch and forget mxnet forever. Only very stubborn users spend time in loop: compiling / building wheel / conda package on external machine, copy to destination machine, fail with some dependency error, etc. Until

Re: Propose to discontinue supporting Apache MXNet on Windows 7

Thanks for all the constructive discussions. I have a few thoughts on this topic: When we say we support a particular platform X, I suppose it means the following processes in production: 1) Active developer support, the minimum of which is a clear instruction to build from source on X. 2)