Re: Questions about MXNet Incubation

Am 17. Januar 2019 00:26:04 MEZ schrieb Bob Paulin : >> *What are the benefits of graduation for the project and our end >users?* >This is one of those: "It's more about the Journey than the end >destination."  Projects that complete incubation have demonstrated that >they meet a certain bar. 

RE: Design proposal - MXNet end to end models - Models with data transformations

+1 for this great proposal. MXNet will be more flexible and portable with this new feature :) Thanks, --Patric > -Original Message- > From: sandeep krishnamurthy [mailto:sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 8:47 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org >

Re: Design proposal - MXNet end to end models - Models with data transformations

Hi Sandeep, Thanks for taking the initiative and sharing the proposal. It's great to see the image operators being extended. To summarize, the design for the first phase provides two alternatives: - D1: Use the existing approach of expressing data transformation pipeline as hybrid block, and

Design proposal - MXNet end to end models - Models with data transformations

Hello Community, Me along with fellow MXNet contributors (Jake , Karan ) are working on the following problem: 1. Some of the data transformations used in training is applicable during inference. Most commonly transformations on validation

Re: Questions about MXNet Incubation

Hi Carin, These are really good answers.  Comments inline. - Bob On 1/16/2019 5:01 PM, Carin Meier wrote: > I was a guest on a podcast the other day talking about MXNet and I got > asked some questions about what it meant for MXNet to be in the incubator. > I tried to answer them the best I

Questions about MXNet Incubation

I was a guest on a podcast the other day talking about MXNet and I got asked some questions about what it meant for MXNet to be in the incubator. I tried to answer them the best I could, but I wasn't too sure if my responses were right. I thought I would ask them here so that I can be more

Re: Question about notification on nightly test failures

The Clojure package now has turned the examples into integration tests that we would like to have CI run. It takes about 15 min for them to complete. We have a PR in progress https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13624 I would like to propose that we run these as part of the regular CI

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Sounds good Steffen. I believe most of these PRs only fix functional problems (they don't add features) and should be fairly low risk. Update from my side: 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <- Already merged, thanks Haibin! Ready for review / merge with all tests