Re: [RESULT][LAZY VOTE] Next MXNet release

I'd like to propose that we expedite the 1.4.0 release slightly as there doesn't seem to be a rule that prevents a minor release from happening at the same time of a patch release. This would shorten the time it takes for new features to reach users. Proposed revision to the timeline: - Code freeze

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Similar to the two PRs that Haibin suggested, 12992 introduces new interface for controlling determinism, which is better suited for minor release. I think other than lack of release manager to drive 1.4.0 release, there’s no reason we cannot do two releases (1.4.0 & 1.3.1) at the same time. I’m

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Hi Anton, Thanks for helping the release. The following PRs are needed by customers who want to use deterministic CUDNN convolution algorithms: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12992 https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13049 Thanks！ Lin On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:51 PM

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Hi Anton, I have the following suggestions for fixes to include in 1.3.1. These each have updates to files that will impact docs generation for the 1.3.x version of the website's Python API docs: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12879 https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Hi Anton, Thanks for driving this, I would like to include the following fix in 1.3.1: Allow infer shape partial on foreach operator: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12471 Keras-MXNet needs this functionality to infer shape partially on foreach operator. (Used in RNN operators) Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Speedup non-code PR in CI

Kellen and Pedro, Thanks for your pointers. I am not an expert in CI but one naive speedup I can see is that if the PR only contains *.md file, then skip the build and testing cycles. This can make documentation/correction easier and save computation resource for other needed tests. Any side effec

Re: [DISCUSS] Speedup non-code PR in CI

There's some documentation summarizing what we've discussed in the past on this site: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/CI+Runtime+Improvements On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:56 AM Pedro Larroy wrote: > It has been raised but there are practical complications about introducing > an ad

Re: [DISCUSS] Speedup non-code PR in CI

It has been raised but there are practical complications about introducing an additional layer of logic for skipping CI in some scenarios. How many of these PRs do we have which will justify investing human effort on optimizing an automated process? How much effort shall it be dedicated to this lo

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Hi Naveen and Anton, Thanks for pointing that out. You are right that these are not critical fixes. Putting them in 1.4.0 is more appropriate. PRs are closed. Best, Haibin On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 7:35 AM Naveen Swamy wrote: > Please note that this is a patch release(1.3.1) to address critical b

Re: [DISCUSS] Build OSX builds in CI (possibly with TravisCI).

Hi, the PR has just been merged. Thank you, Sheng! Travis is now only running compilation on Travis for Mac OS X and we are no longer running tests. The issue to track this case is available at [1]. Best regards, Marco [1]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13136 On Tue, Nov 6,

[DISCUSS] Speedup non-code PR in CI

Dear Community, I recently submitted a few small PRs with only changes in README files. However, I noticed they still triggered the full cycle of CI including build and test on all platforms. Do we have a plan to speed up this process, maybe skipping non-code related PRs in CI? Sorry, if this top

Re: [DISCUSS] Build OSX builds in CI (possibly with TravisCI).

Looks good to me. Sorry this couldn't work out for the community. On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, 7:24 AM Marco de Abreu Hello, > > the PR is available at > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13137. > I'd appreciate a review and merge. > > Best regards, > Marco > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:01

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Please note that this is a patch release(1.3.1) to address critical bugs!, For everything else please wait for 1.4.0 which is planned very shortly after 1.3.1 > On Nov 6, 2018, at 7:17 AM, Anton Chernov wrote: > > The following PR's have been created so far: > > Infer dtype in SymbolBlock impo

Re: [DISCUSS] Build OSX builds in CI (possibly with TravisCI).

Hello, the PR is available at https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13137. I'd appreciate a review and merge. Best regards, Marco On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:01 AM Marco de Abreu wrote: > Sorry, wrong link. The right link is: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17216 > > -Marc

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

The following PR's have been created so far: Infer dtype in SymbolBlock import from input symbol (v1.3.x) https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13117 [MXNET-953] Fix oob memory read (v1.3.x) https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13118 [MXNET-969] Fix buffer overflow in RNNOp (v

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Hi Haibin, I have a few comments regarding the proposed performance improvement changes. CUDNN support for LSTM with projection & clipping https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13056 There is no doubt that this change brings value, but I don't see it as a critical bug fix. I would rathe

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Hi Patric, This change was listed in the 'PR candidates suggested for consideration for v1.3.1 patch release' section [1]. You are right, I also think that this is not a critical hotfix change that should be included into the 1.3.1 patch release. Thus I'm not making any further efforts to bring

Requesting Access for SLACK

Hello, I would like to please have access to slack for MXNet. -- Sincerely, Gavin M. Bell "Never mistake a clear view for a short distance." -Paul Saffo

Re: Apache MXNet Workshop in ODSC

This is awesome Naveen and Sandeep! +1 to encourage the community to spread the word and raise awareness of MXNet. On a similar note, I recently had the opportunity to introduce MXNet in two occasions: - Conducting an MXNet workshop in the Nordics ML Summit conference