Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

> We are looking for a robust solution for MXNet Java developers to use > especially owned and maintained by the Apache MXNet's community. I will be > more than happy to see if you would like to contribute the source code that > generate MXNet JavaCpp package to this repo. So we can own the main

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Double dependency for ONNX (#18824)

Can we drop onnx-tensorrt in favor of native tensorrt integration? It seems perfectly ok to run that outside of MXNet as it's more of an ONNX feature. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache

Re: [CI][v1.x] Update: unix-gpu timeouts

Thank you Chai. On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, 6:35 pm Chaitanya Bapat, wrote: > Hello MXNet community, > > *If your PRs aren't targeted towards v1.* branches [v1.x for e.g.] then > ignore.* > > For a few weeks, we've witnessed timeouts for CI unix-gpu pipelines > specifically on PRs targeted towards v1.x

Re: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky

; > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:30 PM Chen, Ciyong > > wrote: > > > > > Congratulations Sam! > > > Those are great features to MXNet. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Zhao, Patric > > > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 20

Re: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky

-Original Message- > > From: Zhao, Patric > > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 8:40 AM > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky > > > > Congratulations, Sam, thanks all of your great works in MXNe

Re: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky

Congrats Sam!! -Zhi On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:30 PM Chen, Ciyong wrote: > Congratulations Sam! > Those are great features to MXNet. > > -Original Message- > From: Zhao, Patric > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 8:40 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Su

RE: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky

Congratulations Sam! Those are great features to MXNet. -Original Message- From: Zhao, Patric Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 8:40 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky Congratulations, Sam, thanks all of your great works in MXNet

RE: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky

Congratulations, Sam, thanks all of your great works in MXNet 😊 > -Original Message- > From: Chaitanya Bapat > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 1:12 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky > > Congratulatio

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Double dependency for ONNX (#18824)

Thanks for creating the RFC. For readers to understand this issue better, could you substantiate with the PR example of how onnx_tensorrt updates can break the MX-ONNX import/export functionalities? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directl

Re: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky

Congratulations Sam! Well deserved! On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 08:05, Marco de Abreu wrote: > Welcome! > > -Marco > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 4:58 PM sandeep krishnamurthy < > sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > Please join me in welcoming Sam Skalicky(@samskalicky) as a new c

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

This is great discussion. Thanks @lanking520 for initiating this. Perhaps we can define some key metrics here so we can compare the solutions later? -- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

@saudet Thanks for your reply. Still, I am concerned about the first question: you mentioned: > We can go either way, but I found that for contemporary projects like > Deeplearning4j, MXNet, PyTorch, or TensorFlow that > need to develop > high-level APIs on top of something like JavaCPP prefer t

Re: [Announcement] New Committer - Sam Skalicky

Welcome! -Marco On Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 4:58 PM sandeep krishnamurthy < sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Please join me in welcoming Sam Skalicky(@samskalicky) as a new committer > of Apache MXNet (incubating)! > > Sam has made a number of contributions to this project such as

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, > Here's the second update. At the moment we are only missing ICLAs from 20 > (out of 70) contributors, accounting for 31 (out of 913) commits left. IMO That's still a significant number of commits and people. > Regarding whether the contributors are employed by a company that requires > C

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, Here's the second update. At the moment we are only missing ICLAs from 20 (out of 70) contributors, accounting for 31 (out of 913) commits left. 3 @zhenlinluo 3 @jpauwels 3 @hjk41 3 @DrustZ 2 @zhangchen-qinyinghua 2 @yinghu5 2 @reyoung 1 @xinyu-intel 1 @xingmingjie 1 @qiaohaijun 1 @loveisp 1

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] v1.8.0 release (#18800)

I would like to include the [BatchNorm performance improvement PR](https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18676) for axis != 1 to 1.8 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubato

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] v1.8.0 release (#18800)

These PR related to Partition API changes for the Gluon support could be also added: - Partition API adding and deleting new params to Block and Symbol https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18405 - Add backward Type inference to main NN operators https://github.com/apache/incubator-m

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, In the case of Intel and other companies, it may be that their employee contracts do not allow employees to contribute to OS projects. It more likely that the contributor doesn’t own copyright of the code but their employer does. A CCLA give a clear indication that the contributors are inta

Re: Distribution of release candidates

Hi Justin, Please excuse the delay. I replied on general@ [1]. I suggest that we continue the discussion in that thread and not fork the discussion. Regards, Sheng [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r149bb0721c40f145d3a6a9c847f0172cffa5ec78f84d1ee775b4103c%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Justin, Are you OK with proceeding? Regards, Sheng On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 8:30 PM Tianqi Chen wrote: > As long as we have CLA covering for the majority of the code(which I > believe so), I think we should be good. > Just like the case of Apache only requires iCLA from committers. > > The rati

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

As long as we have CLA covering for the majority of the code(which I believe so), I think we should be good. Just like the case of Apache only requires iCLA from committers. The rationale is that normal contributions are already in the form of ALv2, in the case of a(unlikely) dispute, the communit

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi Justin, Thanks, that's a good point. I think we have already received CCLA from Intel. I will take that into account when providing the next update. Regards, Sheng On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 5:39 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Several peoples in below list are from Intel and I have added

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, > Several peoples in below list are from Intel and I have added them into CC. Has Intel signed a CCLA? And if so does it list people who are allowed to contribute to this project? Are there any others on that list who employer’s may need to also sign CCLAs if we don’t have them? Thanks, Ju

RE: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

l Michael ; Bob Paulin > ; wei...@apache.org; jason...@apache.org; Chen, Ciyong > > Subject: Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase > > Hi, > > Here's an update on this issue. We are still missing the ICLAs from 32 (out > of 70) > mshadow contributors, ac

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, Here's an update on this issue. We are still missing the ICLAs from 32 (out of 70) mshadow contributors, accounting for a total of 62 (out of 913) commits. (@ap-hynninen passed away a few years ago and is not included). I reached out to them through email and other channels to collect ICLA for

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

> ## What's missing > > javacpp-presets-mxnet doesn't expose APIs form nnvm/c_api.h (some of current > python/gluon API depends on APIs in nnvm/c_api.h) I've added that the other day, thanks to @frankfliu for pointing this out: https://github.com/bytedeco/javacpp-presets/commit/976e6f7d307b3f38

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

> @saudet Thanks for your proposal. I have four questions would like to ask you: > > 1. If we adopt JavaCpp package, how will that be consumed? Under byteco or > apache MXNet? Essentially from our previous discussion, we really don't want > another 3rdparty checkin. We can go either way, but I

RE: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Sheng Zha Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 3:29 PM To: Justin Mclean Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org; Wall Michael ; Bob Paulin ; wei...@apache.org; jason...@apache.org Subject: Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase Hi, No, I don’t think we used ICLAs for mshadow before. Out of the 42 peopl

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

## What's inside of javacpp-presets-mxnet * Native shared libraries: * libmxnet.so * libjnimxnet.so * libmkldnn.0.so * MXNet scala and java classes * javacpp-presets-mxnet java API implemenations * javacpp generated native bindings * mxnet C_API * mxnet-predict C_API ## What's

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

@saudet Thanks for your proposal. I have three questions would like to ask you: 1. If we adopt JavaCpp package, how will that be consumed? Under byteco or apache MXNet? Essentially from our previous discussion, we really don't want another 3rdparty checkin. 2. Can you also do a benchmark on the

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

@saudet @szha - I think we be a good path forward (from the Clojure perspective) -- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17783#issuecomment-663085890

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

@saudet this looks awesome! An 18% improvement in throughput is quite significant for switching the way of integration for a frontend binding. I think we should definitely start with this offering. @lanking520 @gigasquid what do you think? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed t

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)

Hi, instead of JNA, I would be happy to provide bindings for the C API and maintain packages based on the JavaCPP Presets here: https://github.com/bytedeco/javacpp-presets/tree/master/mxnet JavaCPP adds no overhead, unlike JNA, and is often faster than manually written JNI. Plus JavaCPP provides

RE: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

; Markus Weimer ; Michael Wall Subject: Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1 Thanks! Please don't forget the release vote on incubator. -Marco On Thu, Jul 23, 2020, 9:37 AM Chen, Ciyong wrote: > Dear MXNet community, > > I'm happy to announce

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

Thanks! Please don't forget the release vote on incubator. -Marco On Thu, Jul 23, 2020, 9:37 AM Chen, Ciyong wrote: > Dear MXNet community, > > I'm happy to announce the results of the vote. > This vote passes with 10 +1 votes (3 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes. > > +1 votes > * Sheng Zha / bindi

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, No, I don’t think we used ICLAs for mshadow before. Out of the 42 people who made more than 1 commit or more than 10 lines of code change to mshadow, 26 signed ICLA with Apache (and additionally one member is unfortunately deceased...). Would this be a better criteria as “the major ones”?

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, > Thanks for clarifying. All contributors who made more than 10 commits to > msahdow before are committers of MXNet, so their ICLAs should already be on > file: tqchen, bingxu, eric.xie, sxjscience, mli, yajiedesign [1]. If you > think this is OK, one of the mentors or I can start the notif

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Thanks for clarifying. All contributors who made more than 10 commits to msahdow before are committers of MXNet, so their ICLAs should already be on file: tqchen, bingxu, eric.xie, sxjscience, mli, yajiedesign [1]. If you think this is OK, one of the mentors or I can start the notification. Regard

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, > Thank you, Justin. Though I’m still uncertain about what the definition of IP > clearance process is. The bit you quoted there is for an initial code base, it the second part of that document you need to look at. In short as well as the SGA you need to get signed ICLA from all of the co

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Thank you, Justin. Though I’m still uncertain about what the definition of IP clearance process is, I found the following paragraphs that seem relevant. Sounds like we need three votes from our mentors here for this acceptance. If that’s the case, I can start a vote on it. Regards, Sheng > The

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, See also: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ip_clearance.html Thanks, Justin

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

HI, > Yes and yes. I filed the software grant and received confirmation from > secretary@. As well as the software grant the incline code base needs to go through IP clearance. See [1] option 2. IP clearance involves making sure all all contributors have signed ICLAs and there are no license

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi Justin, Yes and yes. I filed the software grant and received confirmation from secretary@. I’m not sure if I should be updating the page, and if so, how. Regards, Sheng > On Jul 22, 2020, at 1:59 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Has the IP clearance process been followed? I don't se

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Apache MXNet 2.0 Roadmap (#16167)

@fhieber we are planning to release the first public beta on this somewhere in August. At the moment we are finalizing some API changes and also validating them in GluonNLP. We will publish a transition doc as part of the public beta. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

;>>> [x] +1 release the software >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2020/07/20 17:25:50, "Skalicky, Sam" >> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>&

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Apache MXNet 2.0 Roadmap (#16167)

@szha is there a recent estimate on the timeline for MXNet 2.0? Would you recommend to develop downstream toolkits (e.g. Sockeye) against the master branch now or rather wait a little bit longer? Is there already documentation on how to transition MXNet 1.x projects to 2.x? -- You are receiving

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Hi, Has the IP clearance process been followed? I don't see it listed on this page [1] Does the current release being voted on contain this code? Thanks, Justin 1. https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

/* > > > > work > > > > > correctly > > > > > > - staticbuild flow cpu & cu102 variants producing the pip wheels, > > > > tested > > > > > with custom extension library > > > > > > > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

> > > > > > > > Sam > > > > > > > > > > On 7/20/20, 4:07 AM, "Chen, Ciyong" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. > > Do >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

ntent is safe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Aston, Patric for the vote. > > > > > > > > Hi Community, > > > > > > > > I would like to call for action

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

t; > > > > Thanks Aston, Patric for the vote. > > > > > > Hi Community, > > > > > > I would like to call for action to test/validate/vote for the > > release candidate (1.7.0.rc1). > > > As we've not reached th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

te (1.7.0.rc1). > > As we've not reached the quorum, I would like to extend the voting > process to July 22, 23:59:59 PST. > > Please prepare your time and provide feedback if you've tried with > the pre-released code base, thanks! > > > > Best Regards, > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Examples Repo for 2.0

I created the repository at https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet-examples. Next, we will need to set up CI and move some examples there. I'm currently occupied and may not get to it before next month. If someone volunteers to help on this I'd appreciate it. Best, Sheng On 2020/07/17 06:03

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

the > pre-released code base, thanks! > > Best Regards, > Ciyong > > -Original Message- > From: Zhao, Patric > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 11:36 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org; Bob Paulin ; Henr

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Raising the toolchain requirements for MXNet 2 (#17968)

Closed #17968. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17968#event-3568205765

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

: Zhao, Patric Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 11:36 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org; Bob Paulin ; Henri Yandell ; Jason Dai ; Markus Weimer ; Michael Wall Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1 +1 Passed the perf

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

chael Wall Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1 +1 Passed the performance benchmarking for CPU tests and no regression is found. > -Original Message- > From: Aston Zhang > Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2020 1:45 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incuba

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

ai ; Markus Weimer > ; Michael Wall > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1 > > +1 > Passed d2l-en v0.14.1: https://github.com/d2l-ai/d2l-en/releases/tag/v0.14.1 > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:34 AM Chen, Ciyong wrote: > > > Dear MXNe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

+1 Passed d2l-en v0.14.1: https://github.com/d2l-ai/d2l-en/releases/tag/v0.14.1 On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:34 AM Chen, Ciyong wrote: > Dear MXNet community, > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0. > Voting will start 16th July 23:59:59 PST and close on 19th July 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Examples Repo for 2.0

Testing nightly is the perfect middle. Daily/per commit would be too much and Never would be too less. +1 for the proposal! On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 02:08, Kshitij Kalambarkar < kshitijkalambar...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 Great Idea! It is quite useful to have working examples to refer to. > > On Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Examples Repo for 2.0

+1 Great Idea! It is quite useful to have working examples to refer to. On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:17 PM Marco de Abreu wrote: > +1 good idea! > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 5:39 AM Skalicky, Sam > wrote: > > > +1 For regular testing, enhanced doc/tutorial > > > > > On Jul 15, 2020, at 7:40 PM, Shen

Re: [DISCUSS] Examples Repo for 2.0

+1 good idea! On Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 5:39 AM Skalicky, Sam wrote: > +1 For regular testing, enhanced doc/tutorial > > > On Jul 15, 2020, at 7:40 PM, Sheng Zha wrote: > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can

Re: [DISCUSS] Examples Repo for 2.0

+1 For regular testing, enhanced doc/tutorial > On Jul 15, 2020, at 7:40 PM, Sheng Zha wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > Hi, > > Ove

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Use TVMOp with GPU & Build without libcuda.so in CI (#18716)

Instead of linking tvm to mxnet, can we use TVM to generate source code and test as custom c++ operator? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18716#issuecomment-659

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Use TVMOp with GPU & Build without libcuda.so in CI (#18716)

I'm fine to disable tvm op (or mark it as experimental) for now, if it does need another 4 - 6 weeks to fully address the underlying problem, as we have some more urgent tasks on numpy side. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or vie

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 API Deprecation (#17676)

NNPACK is currently only supported in the Makefile build (https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15974), which will be removed. I think oneDNN (mkldnn) replaced it and we can remove it. Any concerns? -- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email direct

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet website improvements (#17982)

https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18719 - beta.mxnet.io redirects to mxnet.incubator.apache.org/ landing page [instead of specific API] - google index needs to be updated to point to mxnet official API page [instead of beta site] -- You are receiving this because you are subscrib

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Use TVMOp with GPU & Build without libcuda.so in CI (#18716)

> Violates the effort of removing libcuda.so totally, (would be great if > someone can elaborate the motivation behind it). Many customers use a single mxnet build that supports gpu features and deploy it to both gpu and cpu machines. Due to the way how cuda containers are designed, libcuda.so

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] Use TVMOp with GPU & Build without libcuda.so in CI (#18716)

@leezu Would you please take a look? Thank you! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18716#issuecomment-658583360

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

18700 [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18703 Thanks, -Ciyong -Original Message- From: Chen, Ciyong Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 10:13 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; d...@mxnet.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0 Tha

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; lau...@apache.org; d...@mxnet.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0 That’s a good point, 1.6 did have a performance regression since it dropped MKLML to simplify build an fix licensing. 2.0 will have performance degradation

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

on, CPU or > > GPU? ~20% regression would be a large gap. > > > > Thanks, > > -Ciyong > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Patrick Mu > > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 4:13 PM > > To: d...@mxnet.apache.org >

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

32, "Chen, Ciyong" wrote: > > Thanks Ziyi, > > > > May I know which platform did you notice the performance regression, CPU or > > GPU? ~20% regression would be a large gap. > > > > Thanks, > > -Ciyong > > > > -Original Message- >

Re: RE: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

CPU or > GPU? ~20% regression would be a large gap. > > Thanks, > -Ciyong > > -Original Message- > From: Patrick Mu > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 4:13 PM > To: d...@mxnet.apache.org > Subject: Re: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0 >

Re: Requesting slack access

Hello Leandro, Welcome to the MXNet Community. I've sent you the invite to the slack channel. Thanks Chai On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 at 17:45, Leandro Campos wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to request access to the Slack of MXNet. > > Thanks, > > Leandro Campos > -- *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat* *+1 (973) 9

RE: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

Thanks Ziyi, May I know which platform did you notice the performance regression, CPU or GPU? ~20% regression would be a large gap. Thanks, -Ciyong -Original Message- From: Patrick Mu Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 4:13 PM To: d...@mxnet.apache.org Subject: Re: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache

Re: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

nor release? > > Thanks, > -Ciyong > > -Original Message- > From: Xingjian SHI > Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2020 4:27 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; d...@mxnet.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0 >

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

Thanks Macro for raising up the concern of license and Sheng for the clarification, the current release process is only targeting source release. Regards, -Ciyong -Original Message- From: Marco de Abreu Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 4:51 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

cubator.apache.org; d...@mxnet.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0 Thanks Ziyi, I've discovered the same issue when I'm trying to use AutoGluon with 1.7.0rc0 and would like to share my finding: Basically, I don't think Gluon Block is design

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

st/validate/vote for the release > >> candidate (1.7.0.rc0) > >>>> As there's not any voting result during the scheduled time window, I > >> would like to extend the time windows to July 13, 23:59:59 PST. > >>>> Please prepare you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

date (1.7.0.rc0) > >>>> As there's not any voting result during the scheduled time window, I > >> would like to extend the time windows to July 13, 23:59:59 PST. > >>>> Please prepare your time and provide feedback if you've tried with the > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

sult during the scheduled time window, I >> would like to extend the time windows to July 13, 23:59:59 PST. >>>> Please prepare your time and provide feedback if you've tried with the >> pre-release code bases, thanks! >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>&g

Re: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

ST. > > > Please prepare your time and provide feedback if you've tried with the > pre-release code bases, thanks! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Ciyong > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chen, Ciyong > > >

Re: I would like to access MxNet Slack

Hello Leon, I've sent you an invite to the Slach group. Welcome to the MXNet Community. Cheers, Chai On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 21:54, Leon Jian wrote: > Hi Sir, > > I would like to access MxNet Slack. > leon.j...@papagoinc.com > > Thank you. > > -Leon > > > --

Re: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

ses, thanks! > > > > Best regards, > > Ciyong > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chen, Ciyong > > Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 10:48 PM > > To: d...@mxnet.apache.org > > Cc: Bob Paulin ; Henri Yandell ; Jason > > Dai ; Markus Wei

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

t; Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 0:03 > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org ; Bob Paulin < > b...@apache.org>; Henri Yandell ; Jason Dai < > jason...@apache.org>; Markus Weimer ; Michael Wall < > mjw...@apache.org> > S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

> > Thanks, > Qing > > > From: Tao Lv > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 0:03 > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Cc: d...@mxnet.apache.org ; Bob Paulin < > b...@apache.org>; Henri Yandell ; Jason Dai < > jason...@apache.org>; Markus Weimer ; Mi

Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet website improvements (#17982)

https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18693 - Clipped table of contents - Missing copy button -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17982#issuecomment-6569

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

t; -Original Message- > From: Chen, Ciyong > Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 10:48 PM > To: d...@mxnet.apache.org > Cc: Bob Paulin ; Henri Yandell ; Jason Dai ; Markus Weimer ; Michael Wall > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

; Bob Paulin ; Henri Yandell ; Jason Dai ; Markus Weimer ; Michael Wall Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0 +1 (binding) I did: - Verify the key and signature; - Untar the source code package; - Build from source code with makefile, USE_BLAS=mkl, USE_MKLDNN=1

Re: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

> > Best regards, > Ciyong > > -Original Message- > From: Chen, Ciyong > Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 10:48 PM > To: d...@mxnet.apache.org > Cc: Bob Paulin ; Henri Yandell ; Jason > Dai ; Markus Weimer ; Michael Wall > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

ell ; Jason > Dai ; Markus Weimer ; Michael > Wall > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0 > > For the language bindings and windows platform, may I have your support to > help verify these features? Thanks! > > @lanking520 to help verify the

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

ou've tried with the pre-release code bases, thanks! Best regards, Ciyong -Original Message- From: Chen, Ciyong Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 10:48 PM To: d...@mxnet.apache.org Cc: Bob Paulin ; Henri Yandell ; Jason Dai ; Markus Weimer ; Michael Wall Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Ap

Re: Access to MXNet Slack Channel for joshr-mx...@joshr.com

Invite sent. Welcome! -sz On 2020/07/08 13:13:58, Josh Rabinowitz wrote: > Hello, > > Can you please allow access for the email > >joshr-mx...@joshr.com >(which is my email address, but not the email address this email comes > from) > > to the MXNet Slack Group? > > Thank you > > J

Re: Joining on Slack

Invite sent. Welcome! -sz On 2020/07/05 05:35:54, Veesh Goldman wrote: > Hi, I have interest in getting involved in the MXNet community. Could I get > an invite for slack? >

Re: Ownership of discuss.mxnet.io

Ticket created, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20493 On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:35 PM Michael Wall wrote: > > Ok, thanks Sheng. I will get a ticket created. > > Looks like there are releases hosted on dist.mxnet.io and > repo.mxnet.io as well? Are we looking for INFRA to host th

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0

For the language bindings and windows platform, may I have your support to help verify these features? Thanks! @lanking520 to help verify the Scala/Java @gigasquid to help verify the Clojure @hetong007 to help verify the R @yajiedesign to help verify the windows platform Best regards, Ciyong Che

RE: Updates for 1.7.0 minor release

e'll move forward with the rest of release process. Again, thanks for your patience. Thanks, -Ciyong -Original Message- From: sandeep krishnamurthy Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 11:07 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Updates for 1.7.0 minor release I agree with

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

I found the template in the link Marco provided and filed the software grant to the secretary. Sheng On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 10:09 AM Michael Wall wrote: > Yes, to secretary@. Do you need a template? > > Thanks Sheng > > Mike > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:59 PM Sheng Zha wrote: > > > > Hi Mich

Re: assimilation of mshadow into the MXNet codebase

Yes, to secretary@. Do you need a template? Thanks Sheng Mike On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:59 PM Sheng Zha wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for offering help. I can represent the code donors and file the > software grant. Should the filing go to secretary@? > > Sheng > > > On Jul 5, 2020, at 9:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >