I wonder where that is.
If I look into UIInput, it calls in restoreState/saveState
saveAttachedState on the validators.
Now that should save and restore the state of the validators, right?
Maybe there's something in the tag which kills them again.
regards,
Martin
On 2/8/06, Mike Kienenberger
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:08 PM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Fwd: status of the optional validator stuff [Was:
> Bookmarking, History and JSF]
>
>
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 8, 2006 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: status of the optional validator stuff [Was: Bookmarking,
History and JSF]
To: Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You're sure there are any API changes?
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:02 PM
> > To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: status of the optional validator stuff [Was:
> > Bookmarking, History and JSF]
> >
> > On 1/31/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAI
age-
> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:02 PM
> To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: status of the optional validator stuff [Was:
> Bookmarking, History and JSF]
>
> On 1/31/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAI
I don't know, but I suspect it'd break the TCK. 1.2 corrected the
1.1 design flaw, so I'm guessing it's required in 1.1.
On 2/8/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it require API changes or would it break the TCK if we would go
> "1.2" compatible here?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
Does it require API changes or would it break the TCK if we would go
"1.2" compatible here?
regards,
Martin
On 2/8/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/31/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By the way - any update on the optional validator stuff together with
On 1/31/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way - any update on the optional validator stuff together with
> partial validation? Ok, maybe we should start a different thread on
> this ;)
I finally got around to updating the wiki page.
The short answer is that it works fine a
