+1
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:10 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It seems that Myriad has more or less stopped activity. Recent user
> question has lead to a recommendation to avoid using Myriad in production
> [1], git commits seem to have stopped a long time ago
Hi All,
It seems that Myriad has more or less stopped activity. Recent user
question has lead to a recommendation to avoid using Myriad in production
[1], git commits seem to have stopped a long time ago [2], and potential
community contributions [3] have gone unanswered. Your reports have been
Sure. I'll work on creating the podling report and submitting it.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:05 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Ok. I'm willing to wait. However, you'll need to follow up quickly.
> I'll also point out that the podling report is due, none submitted.
> Hopefully
Ok. I'm willing to wait. However, you'll need to follow up quickly. I'll
also point out that the podling report is due, none submitted. Hopefully one
can be provided soon.
John
On 2017-11-07 12:57, mohit soni wrote:
> I think we should be able to address the
I think we should be able to address the concerns around PR reviews and
releases while still being a part of the Incubator.
Also, I am fine with driving future features with help of Darin and others
in the community.
Honestly, I would prefer to keep the project in the Incubator for all the
Just so you are aware, it is completely feasible to fork the project to
continue work on it outside of Apache, if you decide on retirement. We
generally don't even pursue naming issues for former podlings, since we would
have not done anything to claim the TM.
Maybe it is possible to build up
Agree with Darin and Mohit. I think the project is still very relevant, but
there is no one actively working on it - I myself couldn't put time on it
as the problem space my employer operates in is very different from
Myriad's. If Mohit is willing to drive the future features and Darin is
ready to
I certainly think the project is relevant but I'm concerned if it belongs
in Apache. When I was active it was difficult to get people to review pull
requests and when releasing v0.2.0 it was hard to even get people to vote
for a release. If only a few people are going to work on it, maybe it's
The project's core idea of dynamic creation and management of YARN clusters
without creating static partitions is still relevant. This project and it's
community were one of the first movers in the still developing space of
stateful containerized distributed systems.
I believe the project is
Just to be clear, this is a discussion thread. Not a vote thread. While I
believe many people vote +1 because they feel its clear why, when you vote
against the idea you should explain why.
So please, treat this more like a discussion rather than a vote and explain why.
On 2017-11-05 13:50,
I believe this project is a cool idea yet no one seems interested enough to
invest in it (myself included).
I checked and at this moment
- The last commit I could find is dated Oct 7, 2016 (read: 13 months
without ANY commits)
- In 2017: The mailing list (ignoring "Jira" emails and email sent to
+1 to retire (non-committer)
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Niels Basjes wrote:
> +1 vote to retire (non-committer)
>
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Brandon Gulla
> wrote:
>
> > +1 vote to retire (non-committer)
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:03
-1 vote to not retire the project (committer, PMC)
I believe the project is still relevant.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Niels Basjes wrote:
> +1 vote to retire (non-committer)
>
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Brandon Gulla
> wrote:
>
> > +1
+1 vote to retire (non-committer)
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Brandon Gulla
wrote:
> +1 vote to retire (non-committer)
>
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:03 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Based on the current state of Myriad and
+1 vote to retire (non-committer)
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:03 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Based on the current state of Myriad and prior discussions I'd like to
> start the discussions around retiring the project.
>
> John
>
--
Brandon
All,
Based on the current state of Myriad and prior discussions I'd like to
start the discussions around retiring the project.
John
16 matches
Mail list logo