resent because SeaMonkey chose didn't find out the reason by now) the
(unsubscribed) OOo mail address as sender (please don't moderate my
other mail to the list):
Hi Louis, all
sorry if I misunderstand your action here, but (if timestamps are true)
you posted this message exactly at the time
Hi Martin, all,
your comments are worth reading and thinking about, but as I want to
reply to one single point, I skip the major part of it (for people not
reading the releases list, i strongly recommend to read the full mail [0])
Martin Hollmichel schrieb:
On 10/17/2010 05:44 AM, Caio
Hi André,
Op 15-10-2010 19:01, André Schnabel schreef:
Hi Louis,
Am 15.10.2010 18:05, schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts:
I guess then we disagree. For I see OpenOffice.org as quite distinct
and different from Oracle, just as it was different from Sun, and
just as it differs from any one company.
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Martin Hollmichel m...@openoffice.org wrote:
On 10/17/2010 05:44 AM, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
What's the difference? Why is there conflict of interest with TDF and
there is not COI with Oracle?
OpenOffice.org was so far the smallest common ground of all the
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Caio Tiago Oliveira cai...@gmail.comwrote:
It would be better if OpenOffice.org as a product could benefit from
every changes made into LibreOffice. But due to SCA this is not
possible, since LibreOffice won't require any kind of shared copyright
assignment
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Lior Kaplan kaplanl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Caio Tiago Oliveira cai...@gmail.comwrote:
It would be better if OpenOffice.org as a product could benefit from
every changes made into LibreOffice. But due to SCA this is not
possible,
