+1 (binding)
Build succeeded.
openjdk version "1.8.0_252"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Zulu 8.46.0.19-CA-macosx) (build 1.8.0_252-b14)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Zulu 8.46.0.19-CA-macosx) (build 25.252-b14,
mixed mode)
I then did my personal three most important scenarios:
1. Ran on the above
That's good. :-)
Gj
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 4:54 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 15:06, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > Seems to be
> > something to do with downloading test JDKs, and the output of the
> > install script - some tests doing that in different order seem fine
> > though.
Should be in two places — right-click on a project (to include the project
path in the shell) and under the Tools menu.
Gj
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 18:20, Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
> Hmm, I no longer find the action for JShell in the IDE. 12.1-beta3
>
>
>
> On 8/24/20 7:06 AM, Jeremy Cavanagh
Let's wait until Monday, yes.
Agree and understand re nbusers.
Gj
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:54 AM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 10:24, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> >
> > Great news, downloading and trying it out now.
> >
> > Should this mails als
Right, maybe leave it for 12.2 unless Jaroslav jumps in quickly.
Gj
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 13:09, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 11:57, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>
> > I think this may be good to have too, if it works out for you and
> Jaroslav:
>
> &g
I think this may be good to have too, if it works out for you and Jaroslav:
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2317
Gj
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:52 AM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 09:53, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > Anyway, I recommend we including you
9519027677aa17e27c6c5d6f83e89/enterprise/glassfish.tooling/src/org/netbeans/modules/glassfish/tooling/server/config/JavaEEProfile.java#L123
> >
> >
> > Are we sure that we would like to track the patch version in the
> > profile for the future? There is nothing bad with it,
https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/restructuring-of-project-templates-in
That should help to show how we've restructured project templates recently.
Gj
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 11:19 PM Scott Palmer wrote:
> "The fact is, most of us need the IDE to support all 3 build tools
> (perhaps
Wait, I take that back. 12.1 is a feature release, not an LTS -- if things
don't work perfectly, that's fine. It would be good, though, to have this
particular feature working perfectly. :-)
Gj
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:47 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Ah, never mind.
>
> Jakarta EE
Ah, never mind.
Jakarta EE 8 Web can only be selected if no server has been selected.
I think we shouldn't release 12.1 unless this is fixed, or we should not
announce that Jakarta EE is supported in 12.1.
Gj
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:42 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all, especially J
Hi all, especially Josh,
A problem I had in 12.1 Beta 1 seems to be gone -- i.e., I can select a
server and then the Java EE versions are available, great.
If I'm correct and this has been fixed between beta 1 and beta 2, can you
point me to the issue or pull request that did the fix?
Thanks,
I'd like to try out 12.1 Beta 2 together with the latest nb-javac.
When I install nb-javac in 12.1 Beta 2, its version is 2.0.
I guess it should be a different version -- which one and how do I get hold
of it to try it.
I'll then also add that info here:
I agree with this.
Gj
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 17:04, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 11:32, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > The second (and hopefully final) beta build for Apache NetBeans 12.1
> > is available.
>
> OK, not final, there will definitely be a beta3! A couple of fixes
> have
Excellent, thank you! Will try it out especially nb-javac with Maven.
Gj
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 12:32, Neil C Smith wrote:
> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>
> The second (and hopefully final) beta build for Apache NetBeans 12.1
> is available. Apologies for the delay - needed to wait for a
Ah, true.
Anyway, can you continue working on your PR so we can merge it?
Gj
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 at 10:01, Tim Boudreau wrote:
> I am not a committer here. I was a committer on netbeans.org.
>
> -Tim
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:07 PM Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>
> &
For nb-javac, we could return to the discussion of getting it installed
during a step in the installer?
Gj
On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 at 19:07, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hopefully we won’t need nb-javac forever and since you’re a committer, why
> not merge your PR?
>
> Gj
>
> On Sat
Hopefully we won’t need nb-javac forever and since you’re a committer, why
not merge your PR?
Gj
On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 at 17:57, Tim Boudreau wrote:
> In order to double check that my update server had complete dependencies, I
> installed a freshly-built build from master a couple of days ago and
Thanks a lot Laszlo, for jumping through all the hoops to make this happen.
Gj
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:38 PM Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
> The Apache NetBeans team is pleased to announce it's first update release
> Apache NetBeans 12.0.
>
> Apache NetBeans 12.0 is a full IDE for Java SE, Java EE,
+1 (binding)
Gj
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 13:19, Eric Barboni wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks
> Eric
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Kai Uwe Pel
> Envoyé : mardi 4 août 2020 20:47
> À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
> Objet : Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Maven Artifacts for 12.0-u1
>
> +1
>
> Works
That’s a great contribution, thanks John! Will add it to the page, check
it, tweet it, etc.
Gj
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 09:54, John wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I, too, have been struggling to set up an environment for debugging
> NetBeans.
> Those videos are somewhat out of date and a bit vague when it
Excellent news!!!
Gj
On 2020/07/27 03:39:00, Arvind Aprameya wrote:
> Hi All,>
>
> We now have the nb-javac available for version Apache NetBeans 12.0.>
>
> Based on current outlook , our plan is to upload nb-javac jar's available by
> 29th or 30th July 2020 in the location HYPERLINK
>
Hi Eric,
Which kind of task are you likely to pick up and do yourself based on this
discussion?
Thanks,
Gj
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 00:01, Eric Bresie wrote:
> Believe these were some of the recent previous discussions on some of this
> for reference
>
>
>
Should we stop this vote or is it still alive and can we vote on it?
Gj
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:22 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 15:38, Laszlo Kishalmi
> wrote:
> >
> > Well, I did an Subversion copy of the 12.0 nbms, then updated that copy
> > only with changes nbms and
> pools, ) but in the "New Web Application" dialog, step 3 (Settings),
> > with "Payara Server" selected, I see "Java EE 8 Web" but not Jakarta EE
> > 8 (under "Java EE Version").
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:12 AM Geertjan Wiele
t; Thank you
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau...@gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau
> <https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:12 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>
ersion}
> provided
>
>
> Looking to update for Jakarta EE 9 (new namespaces) for 12.2.
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau...@gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau
> <https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view
lect it.
>
How is the app different before and after making that change? Is this for
Maven only?
Gj
> Thanks
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau...@gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau
>
> On Jul 22, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Geertjan Wiele
Thanks!
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau...@gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau
> <https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:13 PM Neil C Smith
> wrote:
&
Happy to fill out the empty page -- what are the top 5 or so of these and
what can be considered the release drivers for this?
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/milestone/6?closed=1
Gj
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>
> The first beta
I think this should be merged.
We need some scenarios or documentation of some kind fof testing purposes
and for users of this functionality.
Gj
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 15:39, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:25, Antonio wrote:
> > I understand that dates are important to get
That’s why we need to put an announcement together, clearly communicate it,
including directly to those people in that issue who had problems ladt
time/s.
Gj
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 13:33, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
>
> 16. července 2020 9:32:59 SELČ, Antonio napsal:
> >Hi Jan,
> >
> >Nah, I still
I like it. :-)
Maybe we should put a blog entry together, promote it a lot on Twitter,
etc, with exactly our plans here and the consequences, and provide a
specific date, maybe 1 September, from which point all this will take
effect — this will help to set expectations for Oracle while also
Great!
Maybe someone (a PMC member) wants to shadow Neil and learn from him what
releasing entails so that we can broaden the pool of potential future
release managers?
Gj
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 18:38, Neil C Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's getting near that time again. I don't think anyone has
e right to fork the NetBeans repository with its release
> branches and add functionality upon them then bundle the whole thing
> together as a distribution. There are many other ways of course, but
> generating more work for the community for some vendor specific thing is
> a big no-n
Great, let’s do this.
Gj
On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 06:55, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> - sobota 27. června 2020 10:06:56 CEST, Geertjan Wielenga -
> > Azul would most likely want to include functionality for selecting,
> using,
> > and updating Zulu from within their bundle of
Right, these are good and simpler ideas. Yes, simply Apache NetBeans is the
idea.
If we can do 2) then the problem is simple and solved.
So, how would bundles pre-include plugins?
Gj
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 10:36, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 09:07, Geertjan Wielenga
>
Hi all,
If Azul were to distribute a bundle of NetBeans with Zulu, i.e., the bundle
would be downloadable from an Azul domain, would we as a community be
interested in doing the work of putting that bundle together?
It would be a process that would take place once a year, with our NetBeans
LTS
I’d recommend to target Maven or Gradle.
Gj
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 11:18, Eduard Karel de Jong
wrote:
> Hello Antonio,
>
> Thanks for confirming that different types of projects in NB use
> different paths to store generated code.
>
> My question now is: "how do I find from the code in my
> problem is still there when I try to install plugin, while I’m running JDK
> 14.
> You can verify the Problem with this Plugin for example:
> https://github.com/madflow/flow-netbeans-markdown/releases/tag/2.3.2
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
> Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Hi all,
This problem with Pack200 appears to apply to NBMs -- i.e., assuming that
12.0 can be installed with JDK 14 (is this true?), we also need to think
about how plugins that were packed with pack200 can be installed in 12.0
running on JDK
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:21 PM Neil C Smith
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:24 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This problem with Pack200 appears to apply to NBMs -- i.e., assuming that
> 12.0 can be installed with JDK 14 (is this true?), we also need to think
> about how plugins that were packed with pack200 can be in
Are you sure are TomEE suppprts the kind of project you’re using? Can you
deploy it there from the command line?
Gj
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 17:52, Satinder Singh
wrote:
> Dear Dev Team,
>
> I tried to send this email to the "Users" mailing list, but got a
> MAILER-DAEMON. I do not know if DEV
Options window under Tools menu, then the Appearance tab. Or Preferences
under the NetBeans menu on Mac.
Indeed, this needs to be much easier to find, we’ve discussed this before.
Maybe a toolbar button should open that tab in the Options window or it
should be linked from the Welcome screen.
Gj
Hi Alex,
Well, now that we have a successful and proven quarterly release cycle...
maybe that could make it more attractive for great plugins such as yours to
be integrated directly into Apache NetBeans, out of the box.
It is a great compliment to you that people are asking for this -- and this
+1 (binding)
Gj
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 12:12, Eric Barboni wrote:
> Hi folks, I will need 2 more binding vote.
> After that I can fully celebrate :D
>
> Eric
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Eric Barboni
> Envoyé : mardi 9 juin 2020 13:21
> À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
> Objet : RE:
Good point. Maybe you can add a Troubleshooting section about this at the
end of the Release Notes?
Gj
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 00:30, Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Do we have noted that older nbms (packaged with pack200) will require
> pre-Java 14 JDK at least for installation?
>
> I
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:02 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 12:07, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > -- Announce mailing list
>
> Both of them!
>
> Unless I'm mistaken 11.3 missed being announced in the ASF-wide announce@
> list?!
>
It's on this one t
See this at the end of the issue: "After some debugging it seems that the
newer Maven uses a global cache which prevents the updates from the parent
pom from showing up in the child. Adding
`-J-Dmaven.defaultProjectBuilder.disableGlobalModelCache=true` to
`netbeans_default_options` in
OK, going to announce it now on Twitter and Facebook.
Gj
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:02 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 12:07, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > -- Announce mailing list
>
> Both of them!
>
> Unless I'm mistaken 11.3 missed being announced
Great. Just say when and we'll start promoting it.
Gj
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:20 PM Eric Barboni wrote:
> Hi,
> We should wait a bit. Tomorrow or late today (in +8h)
> Because macos installer may not be fully mirrored.
>
> Regards
> Eric
>
> -Message d'orig
Hi all,
Are we ready to announce the 12.0 release?
-- Twitter
-- Facebook
-- Users mailing list
-- Announce mailing list
-- Apache NetBeans Blog
Any other places?
Gj
Found it:
https://github.com/apache/netbeans-website/blob/master/netbeans.apache.org/src/content/templates/news.gsp
And updated it.
Gj
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:58 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Also I think we should make "Just released!" simply say "Latest release!
Also I think we should make "Just released!" simply say "Latest release!",
that has less of an implication that something happened literally a few
minutes ago.
I just don't know where that text is defined, otherwise I'd change it
myself.
Gj
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:47
Great, done, what about the banner at the top with "Just released"?
Gj
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:39 PM Eric Barboni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry I did a set of PR on website to handle 12.0. is it possible to
> review
> ?
>
> Thanks for the feature and download page already here :D
>
>
>
> Regards
>
Really amazing work, thanks Eric. :-)
Gj
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 11:20 AM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:13, Eric Barboni wrote:
> > Thanks to everyone for collaboration on 12.0.
>
> And massive thanks to you! Great work.
>
> > Next feature freeze for 12.1 is expected on 15th
Well too late now to contribute to NetCAT 12.0 now, but here's the page
where you'd do it the next time around (NetCAT 13.0):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+12.0+Test+Spec+Reviews
If you can reproduce the problem consistently, maybe we can list it in a
We need steps to reproduce the problem.
To avoid this kind of thing being discovered at the time of release, as in
this case, you can add test cases to the NetCAT specs, yes, even for
external plugins. If you don’t, no guarantees anyone will find problems in
time.
Gj
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at
I didn't see that problem myself and wouldn't think it a blocker if I did.
:-)
Gj
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:14 PM Glenn Holmer
wrote:
> I posted this in the voting thread (mea culpa). Can anybody reproduce
> it? Is it a concern? Otherwise, I'll go ahead with my +1.
>
> > 1) built from source
+1 (binding)
Started by downloading the convenience binary, ran it on the following
configuration:
openjdk version "14" 2020-03-17
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu14.27+1-CA (build 14+36)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu14.27+1-CA (build 14+36, mixed mode, sharing)
Was able to specify that I did
Also sent it to annou...@apache.org.
I'll wait a few hours for any comments anyone has on the text, which is a
bit of a mosaic of the comments throughout this thread -- mostly by Eric
Costlow, many thanks! -- and will then tweet this, etc.
Gj
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 1:27 PM Geertjan Wielenga
ough for
> the PMC.
>
> Many kind thanks for your ongoing efforts.
>
> Best,
> Sally
>
> - - -
> Vice President Marketing & Publicity
> Vice President Sponsor Relations
> The Apache Software Foundation
>
> Tel +1 617 921 8656 | s...@apache.org
>
>
Yes, agree with that — I think we should take Eric’s rewrite of my
proposal, link to the report and also link to Jaroslav’s blog entry.
Gj
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 10:33, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 08:30, Jaroslav Tulach
> wrote:
> > My personal take on the malware situation is
that you use when developing
> applications can be infiltrated by malware and make sure that the files you
> check into your versioning system are your own or that you know where they
> come from and what they do."
>
>
>
> From: Neil C Smith
Hi all,
I propose we publish the following on the Apache NetBeans blog re the
recent announcement by GitHub researchers of malware found in some NetBeans
generated projects on GitHub.
Title: Malware Found in 26 NetBeans Ant Projects on GitHub
Content:
"Researchers at GitHub have identified 26
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eSJTTHypDEw
Gj
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 20:44, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 18:40 + schrieb Kenneth Fogel:
> > Too much command line for my liking.
>
> don't take this wrong, but the first thing your students should learn
> is,
Maybe read this:
https://medium.com/azulsystems/using-jlink-to-build-java-runtimes-for-non-modular-applications-9568c5e70ef4
Gj
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 20:32, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> What happened when you put “jlink netbeans” into Google search? I see lots
> of articles...
What happened when you put “jlink netbeans” into Google search? I see lots
of articles...
Gj
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 20:26, Kenneth Fogel
wrote:
> Thank you for the info. jpackage was first fxpackage, then became
> jpackage, then was dropped when FX was dropped, and then just returned. One
> of
Just make sure you really have Beta 6, maybe start with a fresh user
directory. Beta 6 is explicitly there because it fixes bugs around your
scenario and indeed you should be able to decide to not install nb-javac.
Also, can you think carefully about the subject lines of your e-mails. In
this
NetBeans is an Apache project, like any other Apache project. Take a look
at apache.org for info or at netbeans.apache.org for anything specific to
NetBeans.
Gj
On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 08:51, Mario Schroeder
wrote:
> What I'm missing is just a guide how to contribute the code to Apache
>
Yes, otherwise we’ll be stealing someone else’s code.
Gj
On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 11:32, Christian Lenz wrote:
> Why the hell is everything so fucking complicated? We need to discuss
> every single bit of everything. That makes sense for ASF but not for me as
> a developer who wants to bring
s fine. That’s it?
> Some people don’t have interest anymore, don’t have time if we find a new
> owner, like me we can do that?
>
> Other thing is, when the developer Handsover the complete repo to a new
> owner, is this enough too?
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
> Von: Ge
Because that was Jan’s own code. Without an explicit statement from the
owner of a piece of code that they want it to be donated to Apache
NetBeans, ideally they would do the steps themselves, we cannot include it.
Gj
On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 10:29, Christian Lenz wrote:
> I think it depends on
Indeed, master should be substantially the same.
Gj
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:04 PM Tim Boudreau wrote:
> >
> >
> > Note that from 12.0 Beta 4 onwards, JUnit 4 is back in that dialog:
> >
>
> I'm running a build of git master from a couple of days ago, and it is
> there in mine too.
>
>
> >
PS: The above two responses are based on your scenario, i.e., your code,
your module, and the Criteria class in your instructions -- on Mac OSX with
12.0 Beta 5 and JDK 14.
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 1:59 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> When I choose JUnit (i.e., not JUnit 4) in Beta 5, o
This is excellent news. :-)
Gj
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:36 PM Tomáš Procházka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been NetBeans IDE user since version 6.9. I use it mainly for PHP
> development with occasional HTML/JS/XML in my daily job.
>
> I'd like to contribute to PHP editing and tools integration.
org.junit.jupiter
junit-jupiter-engine
5.6.0
test
Gj
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 1:57 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:20 AM Tim Boudreau wrote:
>
>> Just reproduced it again on
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:20 AM Tim Boudreau wrote:
> Just reproduced it again on a NetBeans module project, on a different
> machine than I usually use for coding - different userdir, version of
> NetBeans, etc. I'm curious if anyone else can. Steps to reproduce:
>
> 1. Clone this repo:
>
Cloning into 'ANTLR4-Plugins-for-NetBeans'...
g...@github.com: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Gj
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:09 AM Eric Barboni wrote:
> Hi
> Cannot
aller Certificate" as that is mentioned in [1], and I have
> > found no record of this listed anywhere...
> >
> > Whose certificate was used for the 11.X releases? Was this a personal
> one
> > or an Apache/NetBeans certificate?
> >
> > [1]:
> >
>
:/ )
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Geertjan Wielenga
> Envoyé : jeudi 21 mai 2020 21:13
> À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Potential blocker in 12.0 (and 11.3!)
>
> Thanks, great. Let’s see Eric’s response to this indeed.
>
> Gj
>
> On
Thanks, great. Let’s see Eric’s response to this indeed.
Gj
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 10:47, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 06:08, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > I must add that a sign of a big breakthrough in NetBeans progress is
> > historically always right
Neil’s minimal solution that at least solves the
problem, that Eric includes it in a beta 5 to be released by Monday, and
that we use that to start voting immediately, aiming in a very best case
scenario to release end of next week.
Gj
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 23:41, Geertjan Wielenga wrote
Yeah, I don't think we should discuss anymore if but how this should be
fixed, especially given this is an LTS release.
Gj
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:24 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2020, 20:09 Matthias Bläsing,
> wrote:
>
> > this is not true. The problem exist since the first
I don't see anyone arguing at this stage that this is not a blocker -- or
at least no one is saying it should not be fixed for 12.0.
What is your opinion on this, since you're one of very few who understands
the scope of this problem: what would you recommend?
Gj
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:09
+1
Please, everyone, we need you to do this. Don’t think that someone else
will do it — do it yourself, we need your feedback, it’s not much work, and
we want to release 12.0, which means we need your feedback and approval on
this! :-)
Gj
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 13:55, Jiří Kovalský
wrote:
>
Provide your Confluence username and we’ll give you permissions to the
Wiki. For the website, just provide a pull request (see the link at the
bottom of each page). Indeed, not so clear where this status should be put
— where would you suggest?
Gj
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 00:53, Brad Walker
I don’t see why that wouldn’t be OK.
Gj
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 07:58, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> If a branch in the main repository is OK for the IP Clearance process,
> then that is obviously the easiest solution.
>
> Jan
>
> 13. května 2020 7:33:20 SELČ, Geertjan Wielenga
>
Or maybe a branch of our mainline?
Gj
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 07:32, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
>
> Your plan sounds great. Maybe one of our several existing repos could be
> used.
>
> Gj
>
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 07:21, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>&
Your plan sounds great. Maybe one of our several existing repos could be
used.
Gj
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 07:21, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems there may be some progress on cleaning up the C/C++ code, so I wanted
> to check what is the best/correct way to proceed.
>
> Obviously, this needs
12 May 2020 at 13:52, Neil C Smith wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 12:56, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > > I'm trying to reproduce this in 11.3 but am failing to do so, could you
> > > provide some quick steps from scratch, assuming I have just installed
>
backported to 12.0.
Gj
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 14:52, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 12:56, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > I'm trying to reproduce this in 11.3 but am failing to do so, could you
> > provide some quick steps from scratch, assuming I have just installed
I'm trying to reproduce this in 11.3 but am failing to do so, could you
provide some quick steps from scratch, assuming I have just installed 11.3
and am starting with a clean userdir?
Gj
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:02 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed off-list with Geertjan and
I doubt these sources are still around. Why do you need them?
Gj
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 07:51, KAN Phil wrote:
> Hey everyone.
>
> First time poster. Not really sure if this is the right forum. I’m
> looking for the NetBeans 3.5.1 source code. I can find the installer in
> various places,
Hi all,
Are there any reasons not to go ahead with Beta 4 now — and then do the
satisfaction survey and release 12.0?
Sure, there are various items to be looked at, but there’s another release
each quarter and — unless there are blockers — it’s time to move forward.
Thanks,
Gj
Note though that you can change the color of the textblock yourself to your
liking in the Options window.
Gj
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 18:43, Scott Palmer wrote:
> I just started using the new multiline strings literals in JDK-14 and
> noticed that with a dark look and feel like either "Dark
FPR - Ponta Grossa
> (45) 99836-1827
>
>
>
> Em qui., 30 de abr. de 2020 às 10:02, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@apache.org> escreveu:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce that two NetBeans PMC members, Geertjan
> > Wielenga and Neil C S
ng that there was a specific fixable problem.
>
> -- Eirik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geertjan Wielenga
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 1:08 PM
> To: dev@netbeans.apache.org
> Subject: Re: nb-javac and the upcoming 12.0
>
> Well, it’s specifically about
an old JDK.
>
> -- Eirik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geertjan Wielenga
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:53 PM
> To: dev@netbeans.apache.org
> Subject: Re: nb-javac and the upcoming 12.0
>
> Hopefully that’s not sarcasm. :-)
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue
actually seems very reasonable!
>
> -- Eirik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geertjan Wielenga
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:29 PM
> To: dev@netbeans.apache.org
> Subject: Re: nb-javac and the upcoming 12.0
>
> Yes, the Java editor uses the JDK 14 javac
.
>
> What is unclear to me, and it seems I’m not alone, is if NB is running on
> JDK-14 without nb-javac, what do we miss when working on a project that
> builds with JDK-8? Can the NB editor not use JDK-14’s javac even tough the
> build runs with JDK-8?
>
> Scott
>
> >
501 - 600 of 1341 matches
Mail list logo
