Re: wrong FX architecture prompt

2020-06-02 Thread Neil C Smith
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 13:01, Glenn Holmer wrote: > Where is this documented? Shouldn't it be in the vote email? Probably. The differences are really minor, but it's the second time something has come up about it. If you want to replicate the binary zip build from the source, which we probably

Re: wrong FX architecture prompt

2020-06-02 Thread Glenn Holmer
On 6/2/20 3:55 AM, Neil C Smith wrote: >> I would recommend using ant build and then extracting the zip to test the >> release. I changed some of the related documentation along these lines >> during 11.2. There are some subtle differences. >> >> IIRC you have an extras folder in bin/netbeans?

Re: wrong FX architecture prompt

2020-06-02 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 23:07, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, 22:49 Glenn Holmer, wrote: >> >> > Out of interest, how did you build - ant or ant build? And how did you run >> > it after build? From the zip? >> >> ant -Dpermit.jdk9.builds=true >> nbbuild/netbeans/bin/netbeans > > > I

Re: wrong FX architecture prompt

2020-06-01 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, 22:49 Glenn Holmer, wrote: > > Out of interest, how did you build - ant or ant build? And how did you > run > > it after build? From the zip? > > ant -Dpermit.jdk9.builds=true > nbbuild/netbeans/bin/netbeans > I would recommend using ant build and then extracting the zip to

Re: wrong FX architecture prompt

2020-06-01 Thread Glenn Holmer
On 6/1/20 3:56 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, 21:49 Glenn Holmer, wrote: > >> Just as I described. I tried it again just now, and got the "JavaFX >> Implementation for Windows" prompt, as Matthias reported. Interestingly, >> when I used the convenience binary instead of the build

Re: wrong FX architecture prompt

2020-06-01 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, 21:49 Glenn Holmer, wrote: > Just as I described. I tried it again just now, and got the "JavaFX > Implementation for Windows" prompt, as Matthias reported. Interestingly, > when I used the convenience binary instead of the build from source, it > correctly said "Linux". >

Re: wrong FX architecture prompt

2020-06-01 Thread Glenn Holmer
On 6/1/20 2:44 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, 20:14 Glenn Holmer, wrote: > >> I posted this in the voting thread (mea culpa). Can anybody reproduce >> it? Is it a concern? Otherwise, I'll go ahead with my +1. >> > Yes, and no. Matthias mentioned it here. It should be just a

Re: wrong FX architecture prompt

2020-06-01 Thread Neil C Smith
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, 20:14 Glenn Holmer, wrote: > I posted this in the voting thread (mea culpa). Can anybody reproduce > it? Is it a concern? Otherwise, I'll go ahead with my +1. > Yes, and no. Matthias mentioned it here. It should be just a cosmetic issue in that the right thing will install,

Re: wrong FX architecture prompt

2020-06-01 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
I didn't see that problem myself and wouldn't think it a blocker if I did. :-) Gj On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:14 PM Glenn Holmer wrote: > I posted this in the voting thread (mea culpa). Can anybody reproduce > it? Is it a concern? Otherwise, I'll go ahead with my +1. > > > 1) built from source