Dear all,
I'd like to collect some feedback on the Gradle Distribution Settings
(Tools > Options > Java > Gradle > Execution Panel > Distribution Section)
Over the years, Gradle evolved and some usage patterns has changed.
8 years ago, Gradle Daemon was in incubation phase. It could took a
It's a +1 for me.
--
Thilina01
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023, 12:14 AM Neil C Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to previously discussed issues and delays caused by running
> multiple voting threads on the various convenience binaries, we'd like
> to try a single voting thread covering all artefacts for
+1
In fact, let's make this a big +1:
_
_| |_ ||
|_ _| | |
|_|| |
| |
| |
|___|
On 10/2/23 19:43, Neil C Smith wrote:
Due to previously discussed issues and delays caused by running
multiple voting threads on the various
+1
I like when ideas are given a chance.
On 2/10/23 10:43, Neil C Smith wrote:
Hi,
Due to previously discussed issues and delays caused by running
multiple voting threads on the various convenience binaries, we'd like
to try a single voting thread covering all artefacts for NetBeans 17.
We
I like it, so a non-lazy +1 from me.
questions:
The text mentions sig testing but there are no checkboxes for that. This
creates an uncertainly whether or not someone read the manual or skipped
to the boxes.
(also: should I try to automate the sig test in a manually triggered
workflow?)
Yep, Bill of Materials have been around for a long time now...
- 2020 https://lists.apache.org/thread/xqf041nzhl1rwvh4gosqkg19h43g9fl6
- 2022 https://lists.apache.org/thread/ll2xq0mrbdw9y3rwm1gpnf7ovc2ld4rf
Cheers,
Antonio
On 10/2/23 12:22, Neil C Smith wrote:
Yes, Eric and I had a
Hi,
Due to previously discussed issues and delays caused by running
multiple voting threads on the various convenience binaries, we'd like
to try a single voting thread covering all artefacts for NetBeans 17.
We can then review after the release.
Eric and I have put together a vote email
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 12:37, Michael Bien wrote:
>
> On 10.02.23 12:22, Neil C Smith wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 02:25, Michael Bien wrote:
> >> The danger is that the next request will be profiles like netbeans-lite :)
> > Is that a danger?! I thought that was the point of a modular
On 10.02.23 12:22, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 02:25, Michael Bien wrote:
The danger is that the next request will be profiles like netbeans-lite :)
Is that a danger?! I thought that was the point of a modular framework! :-)
well, it is modular. Cluster BoMs would be useful
On 09.02.23 05:38, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
I was my NetBeans libraries to be as portable as possible and also run on
Android. I want to use `Lookup` & co.
what percentage of NetBeans can run on android? Are users simply hoping
that it works or are they running our tests on android? Since we
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 11:05, Edwin F. wrote:
> Yes, I was thinking in pom artifacts with the required dependencies for
> independent modules and nothing more, like
>
>- modules-core
>- modules-db
>- modules-editor
>- etc.
>
> Just like the cluster pom:
Yes, Eric and I had a
Thanks Michael for answering.
Yes, I was thinking in pom artifacts with the required dependencies for
independent modules and nothing more, like
- modules-core
- modules-db
- modules-editor
- etc.
Just like the cluster pom:
org.netbeans.cluster
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 19:37, Antonio wrote:
> How am I expected to do this? I mean,
>
> a) Shall I keep the original license in a commit, so it can be tracked
> in the future, and then replace the license with the Apache License and
> continue with modifications in future commits? That won't do,
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 19:02, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> - commit to make NetBeans runnable on JDK LTS -1
> - build with JDK LTS -1
> - be able to be build with the current JDK
+1 as long as that includes the platform.
That is what I suggested in the other thread (I don't see why we need
multiple
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 02:31, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
>
> Dne úterý 10. ledna 2023 15:16:35 CET, Michael Bien napsal(a):
> > Hello devs,
> >
> > I hope everyone recovered from the last JDK 8 thread and is ready for
> > the first JDK 8 thread of 2023 :)
>
> Nobody recovers from these threads with
15 matches
Mail list logo
