Re: Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Hi, Resolving this issue is important for later but not important to the present task of importing the donated files. I'm not familiar enough with the work flow for .form files which makes this thread impossible for me to follow. The goal is to have the .form files contain an Apache header

Re: Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Either way, I think doing what is suggested in these couple comments, and what Jarda is saying, are orthogonal. I feel we should take it as it is at the moment, as Jarda suggested, and if it isn’t supported, it isn’t. There is a license file for the project as a whole, and there are files in

Re: Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Jan, The idea would be to add the license only if it's configured for the project. Regards, Michael On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Michael Nascimento > wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Jan

Re: Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Michael Nascimento wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > > > For forms, I guess we could (at some point): > > -change the form editor to preserve leading comments > > -manually add the headers to the

Re: Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > For forms, I guess we could (at some point): > -change the form editor to preserve leading comments > -manually add the headers to the form files > -(possibly) change the templates to include the license header when the > form

Do you count or blindly trust was: (Main) NetBeans source to Apache

Dear Bertrand, thanks for your patience. On úterý 5. září 2017 14:41:30 CEST Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Geertjan Wielenga > > wrote: > > ...We're following the advice of caution -- and waiting to hear > > whether/when the push

Re: installer is unsigned but requires admin privileges

Yes, those builds are valid. Yet they have nothing to do with Apache. Can you stop writing in this thread and discuss in the other thread instead, i.e., the one with Oracle engineers included? Thanks, Gj On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Alvin Thompson wrote: >

Re: installer is unsigned but requires admin privileges

Especially since there's nothing on netbeans.org to lead people to believe these builds aren't still valid... > On Sep 6, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Alvin Thompson wrote: > > Interesting--the daily builds are still working on the original site and are >

Re: installer is unsigned but requires admin privileges

Interesting--the daily builds are still working on the original site and are producing builds, which seem to have differences between them: http://bits.netbeans.org/download/trunk/nightly/latest/ Should these be shut down? > On Sep 6,

Re: Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Hi, On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Jaroslav Tulach > wrote: > > ...When we did the Oracle review we managed to convince the reviewer > that certain > > files don't need

Re: Checking the headers process was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Hi, On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > ...3. verify all files (except well known exceptions like manifest.mf, *.form > as I > argued in other email) have the Apache license Note that https://creadur.apache.org/rat/ is the standard Apache

Re: Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Hi, On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > ...When we did the Oracle review we managed to convince the reviewer that > certain > files don't need a license The ASF equivalent of that is https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html which says

Checking the headers process was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

Hello Craig, thanks a lot for taking a look at jackpot30 repository and providing your opinion... On pondělí 4. září 2017 12:23:38 CEST Craig Russell wrote: > I'm not mentoring this project, so this is just peanut gallery talk. > > There are 644 new files in the incubator-netbeans-jackpot30.git

Form files & manifest files headers was: [Mentors] Review my migration steps was: My first commit

When we did the Oracle review we managed to convince the reviewer that certain files don't need a license. As Jan explains having a license in manifest.mf files has a potential runtime impact. Thus it is not there and I don't think we should strive to add it. Michael's idea of modifying

Re: installer is unsigned but requires admin privileges

Please understand that there are no development builds yet for Apache NetBeans. There is no code yet in the Apache NetBeans repo and hence no builds at all. Thanks, Gj On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 at 01:06, Alvin Thompson wrote: > Currently on macOS, trying to install the