Re: Propose for a patch to avoid duplicate native libs integration for supporting different windows os

Hi Matthias, thanks for your replay. I would prefer "windows" because this corresponds to "linux". An other open question is if there should be an equivialent patch for the JNA stuff. I will have a look at this. An other question is where are the files I have to patch to add the new

Re: Oracle will remove JavaFX from Oracle JDK (was: Re: Noticed Oracle is Working to Remove Java FX, AWT, and Swing from Base Java/JDK)

On Mar 9, 2018 18:16, "Neil C Smith" wrote: On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 22:31 Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Oracle is still committed to Swing and AWT to at least 2026. There is > no mention of removing it. > > So we should keep calm. > Calm is good :-)

Re: New NetBeans splash screen? :-)

How about an irregular shape like a broken glass window that a baseball went thru? On Mar 9, 2018 4:18 PM, "Laszlo Kishalmi" wrote: Well, the current splashscreen implementation is based on an abandoned Java 6 splashscreen feature which is supposed to help the user

AW: Netbeans 9.0 is very unstable with lombok in JDK 9

I have to use lombok in our Company, so it works ok but is not that Feature rich unfortunately. I can’t refactor the getter and setter, when I added @Getter and @Setter and Change the private variable. There is an Option while refactoring: „Refactor getter and setter too“. But it seems not

Re: Oracle will remove JavaFX from Oracle JDK (was: Re: Noticed Oracle is Working to Remove Java FX, AWT, and Swing from Base Java/JDK)

I published a blog entry on my take on the announcement: https://cuprak.info/2018/03/08/javafx-thoughts/ -Ryan > On Mar 9, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 22:31 Matthias Bläsing

Re: Netbeans 9.0 is very unstable with lombok in JDK 9

On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 19:44:08 -0300 Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva wrote: > > So, what you are telling me seems to be more-or-less a great > misunderstanding. Mostly for others, that miss I am building everything from source. I care more about compile time than runtime

Re: Oracle will remove JavaFX from Oracle JDK (was: Re: Noticed Oracle is Working to Remove Java FX, AWT, and Swing from Base Java/JDK)

On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 22:31 Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Oracle is still committed to Swing and AWT to at least 2026. There is > no mention of removing it. > > So we should keep calm. > Calm is good :-) Still, that particular date is just talking about the end of

Re: Netbeans 9.0 is very unstable with lombok in JDK 9

Well, lombok is filled with eclipsy stuff because it is a parasitic compiling tool, not a library. Keep that in mind, since many people misses that: LOMBOK IS NOT A LIBRARY. In javac, it does its black magic by invading javac's inner AST's. For eclipse, it is worse because it replaces some of

Oracle will remove JavaFX from Oracle JDK (was: Re: Noticed Oracle is Working to Remove Java FX, AWT, and Swing from Base Java/JDK)

Hey, I corrected the subject. Am Freitag, den 09.03.2018, 16:44 -0500 schrieb Wade Chandler: > > Sorry if a thread I have missed on this exists here. A friend of mine sent > me this link > > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/javaclientroadmapupdate2018mar-4414431.pdf Short summary

Re: Netbeans 9.0 is very unstable with lombok in JDK 9

On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 16:11:23 -0500 cowwoc wrote: > I gave up using Lombok with JDK 9 months ago. Yes, it is far more > unstable under Netbeans than with other IDEs but it is generally a > mess under JDK9 regardless of which IDE you use. I am not a fan of Lombok either.

Re: Noticed Oracle is Working to Remove Java FX, AWT, and Swing from Base Java/JDK

On page 7 they claim that AWS/Swing support will not be touched (at least until Java 11). It seems only JavaFX is directly affected. Gili On 2018-03-09 4:44 PM, Wade Chandler wrote: All Sorry if a thread I have missed on this exists here. A friend of mine sent me this link

Re: Noticed Oracle is Working to Remove Java FX, AWT, and Swing from Base Java/JDK

Here's a direct quote from your link: "Swing and AWT will continue to be supported on Java SE 8 through at least March 2025, and on Java SE 11 (18.9 LTS) through at least September 2026." Gj On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:44 PM, Wade Chandler wrote: > All > > Sorry if a

Noticed Oracle is Working to Remove Java FX, AWT, and Swing from Base Java/JDK

All Sorry if a thread I have missed on this exists here. A friend of mine sent me this link http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/javaclientroadmapupdate2018mar-4414431.pdf It has interesting consequences for NetBeans. It mentions they have some interested parties looking to take on

Re: New NetBeans splash screen? :-)

Well, the current splashscreen implementation is based on an abandoned Java 6 splashscreen feature which is supposed to help the user experience on the slow bootstrap of the JVM. It takes an image from AFAIK bootstrap.jar upon a MANIFEST.MF attribute. The JVM displays that image before even

Re: Netbeans 9.0 is very unstable with lombok in JDK 9

I gave up using Lombok with JDK 9 months ago. Yes, it is far more unstable under Netbeans than with other IDEs but it is generally a mess under JDK9 regardless of which IDE you use. Gili On 2018-03-09 4:09 PM, Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva wrote: Hi, I download latest Netbeans 9.0 beta

Netbeans 9.0 is very unstable with lombok in JDK 9

Hi, I download latest Netbeans 9.0 beta last week and I'm using with JDK 9. My lombok projects makes Netbeans really unusable. Those are the steps for reproducing it: 1. Create a new project. 2. Set the properties of the project to ensure that it is using JDK 9. 3. Download lombok-1.16.20.jar

Re: New NetBeans splash screen? :-)

On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 15:01 Bernd Ruehlicke wrote: > Maybe there is an > easier way to make a non-rectangular splash ? > There is java.awt.Window.setShape(), would that work? https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/uiswing/misc/trans_shaped_windows.html Pete

Re: New NetBeans splash screen? :-)

Could be cool with a non rectangular splash. A trick - or rather hack ;-)  to render such a splash without too much brain activity needed and leverage existing codebase, is to dynamically screendump the rectangular area were the splash would usually, and draw/copy in the non rectangular

layer.xml to define new generated file name

Hi All I am creating a new file template. How to define the new generated file name in layer.xml or wherever? At least I want to file name starts with capital letter. Now, it gives me "newSample.g4". Thanks Thanks >From Peter

Re: website:features section

Comments below, On 09/03/18 11:45, Neil C Smith wrote: On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 10:13 Antonio wrote: 2- Have Oracle review it for IP clearance & approval. (I'm not sure about the order of this: whether Oracle wants to review the PR and then we merge or if we merge and then

Re: Automating website publishing

Pending automation, Mr ultra-slow Jenkins here has updated the live site based on the last two PR's on master. Incidentally noticed while git diffing the changes that the asciidoc converter seems to add a tag around every tag. That may be the most blatant example of superfluous markup ever! ;-)

Re: website:features section

On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 at 10:13 Antonio wrote: > 2- Have Oracle review it for IP clearance & approval. > > (I'm not sure about the order of this: whether Oracle wants to review > the PR and then we merge or if we merge and then Oracle reviews it). > fyi - thought I'd add a nice

website:features section

Hi all, I've submitted PR#2 to incubator-netbeans-website-cleanup [1] (against the "asciidoc-features" branch, not against "master"). This PR contains a Maven tool that transforms the "features" section of the old website into asciidoc format, copying referenced images and translating image

Re: Possible Removal of SVN

Yes, installed via a plugin. Gj On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Gary Bello wrote: > I don't understand - It is available in my Netbeans 8.2 Team dropdown. > Perhaps installed from plugin - is that not part of Netbeans ? > > -Gary > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:36 AM,

Re: Possible Removal of SVN

I don't understand - It is available in my Netbeans 8.2 Team dropdown. Perhaps installed from plugin - is that not part of Netbeans ? -Gary On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:36 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:16 AM, emiddio-frontier

Re: Possible Removal of SVN

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:16 AM, emiddio-frontier wrote: > my vote is keep both CVS and SVN . > We can't keep something that already isn't kept. CVS has not been part of NetBeans for several years now. We can decide to reintroduce it, though I wonder if there's a need for

Re: Possible Removal of SVN

my vote is keep both CVS and SVN . -Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org For further information about the

AW: New NetBeans splash screen? :-)

Hi, I commented my proposals to the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-146. Maybe we should create a new one/Sub ticket for each brand that we want to Change. Cheers Chris Von: Michal Hlavac Gesendet: Freitag, 9. März 2018 09:17 An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org

Re: New NetBeans splash screen? :-)

to be clear, I meant to be prepared. Not to solve hiDPi problem in netbeans 9. m. On piatok, 9. marca 2018 9:07:09 CET Michal Hlavac wrote: Hi, will be great to think about hiDPi when changing things. e.g. splash screen will be sized based on dpi. thanks, m. On štvrtok, 8. marca 2018

Re: New NetBeans splash screen? :-)

Hi, will be great to think about hiDPi when changing things. e.g. splash screen will be sized based on dpi. thanks, m. On štvrtok, 8. marca 2018 20:13:35 CET Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all! > > Now that we have a new logo and new website — a next logical step would > include a new splash