Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Thursday, January 11, 2018, cowwoc wrote: > On 2018-01-10 8:05 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> I want to ensure that the vast majority of regressions are fixed prior to >>> a >>> release. >>> >> >> You are going to need to list the many regressions right here in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

+1 I’ve been building VisualVM plugins and running them with this version. > On Jan 11, 2018, at 4:54 AM, John Brock wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I was able to install, load AnagramGame, build and run on Windows 10. > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:00 PM cowwoc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

+1 (binding) I was able to install, load AnagramGame, build and run on Windows 10. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:00 PM cowwoc wrote: > On 2018-01-10 8:05 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> I want to ensure that the vast majority of regressions are fixed prior > to a > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On 2018-01-10 8:05 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: I want to ensure that the vast majority of regressions are fixed prior to a release. You are going to need to list the many regressions right here in this thread, with a URL to a bug in Issuezilla, otherwise they cannot be taken into

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Thank you! We can download it now. +1 (binding) I've verified the following: - $ md5sum incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-source.zip - $ sha1sum incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-source.zip - $ ant (BUILD SUCCESSFUL) - $ ant tryme Best regards, Junichi 2018-01-11 10:16 GMT+09:00 Geertjan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Junichi Yamamoto wrote: >> At startup you are prompted to install it and then an install procedure is >> provided. > > Yes, I know it. But currently, plugin's status is "PENDING". > So we can get the following message: "nb-javac library"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Thursday, January 11, 2018, Junichi Yamamoto wrote: > Hi Geertjan, > > It seems that we cannot install nb-javac Library[1] via NetBeans > directly. i.e. We have to download it manually. At startup you are prompted to install it and then an install procedure is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

On Thursday, January 11, 2018, Gili T. wrote: > Who gets to vote? Read the end of my e-mail and you will see the answer. Everyone who wants to vote gets to vote. > What determines when the final release is made? Whether the sources in the artifact to be voted on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi Geertjan, It seems that we cannot install nb-javac Library[1] via NetBeans directly. i.e. We have to download it manually. Could you please verify it? [1] http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/73454/nb-javac-library Thanks, Junichi 2018-01-11 8:14 GMT+09:00 Geertjan Wielenga

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Who gets to vote? What determines when the final release is made? My concern is that I've seen many regressions relative to 8.2 and very few new features (jdk9 support being the major feature that I am aware of). I want to ensure that the vast majority of regressions are fixed prior to a release.

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

Hi all, Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1! If this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release this version. Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) constitutes all the modules

Re: [DISCUSS] 9.0 Beta release

The sooner the better. --emi > Original Message >Subject: [DISCUSS] 9.0 Beta release >Local Time: 10 January 2018 10:43 PM >UTC Time: 10 January 2018 20:43 >From: geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com >To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > >Hi all, > > Seems to me the key items

Re: DevFaq wiki update

I don't have a fetish for GitHub, it's just easier to implement I guess. A GitHub PR seems an improvement to Confluence though! As for a plain wiki, I am also OK with it. Apache provides MoinMoin, we could make an INFRA request for an instance and move our wiki there. I'm curious if MoinMoin

[DISCUSS] 9.0 Beta release

Hi all, Seems to me the key items planned for the Beta release are done: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+Beta I think we should put together the release artifacts and start the VOTE thread here and then move to the IPMC, as we did for Alpha:

Re: DevFaq wiki update

agreed with Emilian. observations On 10/01/2018 20:03, Emilian Bold wrote: I also vote on avoiding Confluence. I think a static site and a wiki are somewhat orthogonal things. I believe even the old wiki needed a login for edit. Using a GitHub PR /might/ be good enough for the technical

Re: DevFaq wiki update

On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 19:03 Emilian Bold wrote: > > I think a static site and a wiki are somewhat orthogonal things. > > I believe even the old wiki needed a login for edit. > Yes, and so would this - the two options are for committers to have direct edit and other

Re: DevFaq wiki update

I also vote on avoiding Confluence. > I think a static site and a wiki are somewhat orthogonal things. I believe even the old wiki needed a login for edit. Using a GitHub PR /might/ be good enough for the technical articles. --emi > Original Message >Subject: Re: DevFaq wiki

Re: DevFaq wiki update

On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 18:41 Matthias Bläsing wrote: > And before someone says "github will stay forever", sourceforge used > its market value for bad marketing (bundle free software with an > malware installing installer) and if enough money is offered, github > and

Re: DevFaq wiki update

Hi all, Am Mittwoch, den 10.01.2018, 11:46 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Antonio wrote: > > ...I think we should make a final decision on whether to host the > > wiki at > > Confluence or at the website, taking into account an

Re: DevFaq wiki update

Hi, On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 15:55 Antonio Vieiro wrote: > 1. Which “NetBeans Github Repo” are we talking about? The website or the > source code? Maybe the website is more appropriate, right? > I was thinking source code, because that might be more visible? Arguments for

Re: DevFaq wiki update

Hi Neil, I think these are all sensible ideas. Just two comments: 1. Which “NetBeans Github Repo” are we talking about? The website or the source code? Maybe the website is more appropriate, right? 2. I just did this experiments with the DevFaq as I thought that would be more useful, maybe we

Re: DevFaq wiki update

Hi, On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 08:41 Antonio wrote: > I think we should make a final decision on whether to host the wiki at > Confluence or at the website, taking into account an approximate date > for the website to be available. > My inclination would be to do something

Re: DevFaq wiki update

If nobody argues against this I´ll suspend the infra request within a few hours. Thanks, Antonio. > El 10 ene 2018, a las 11:46, Bertrand Delacretaz > escribió: > >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Antonio wrote: >> ...I think we should make a

Re: DevFaq wiki update

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Antonio wrote: > ...I think we should make a final decision on whether to host the wiki at > Confluence or at the website, taking into account an approximate date for > the website to be available +1 and if that decision cannot be made

DevFaq wiki update

Hi all, There's a new 'wiki-convert' tool [1] that converts the files in the old wiki's DevFaq from WikiText to AsciiDoc. The tool (a Maven project that uses eclipse's mylyn wikitext) can also be used to generate markdown or xhtml. The generated AsciiDoc files [2] contain jbake-ready