On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 at 18:35 John McDonnell
wrote:
> I think there was a PR for the website opened recently today to fix that.
>
I merged and rebuilt this already - please check it's now as expected.
We're putting bits in place for the build to be automated - at the
Hi,
Maybe it has already been discussed here, but there is also some
confusion/mixup with the hashes and signatures of the binaries on the
download page:
https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb90/nb90-beta.html
The binary matches the 9.0-beta-rc3 as far as I can see but the linked
signature file
The first link shows all three releases. Thanks for clarifying the
link to the official release site; I will tag it. I downloaded rc3
and will start using that release. The previous one was the 9.0-beta
release.
I reported a bug in the package (it is in all releases - maybe a
licensing issue).
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:01:04 -0400
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
>
> Or if its an Apache mirroring issue. I
> have seen issues with tag differences on Github and Apache. A couple
> times the entire groovy repo on Github disappeared. Other times newer
> tags exist in Apache
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:54:55 +0100
Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> You're pointing to the Apache NetBeans Platform, which is Apache
> NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Alpha.
>
> The Apache NetBeans IDE, which is Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0
> Beta, is here:
>
>
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:47:20 -0400
Efrem Mc wrote:
> HI, I know beside Github
>
> This a link to all the releases for 9.0-beta, 9.0-beta-rc2 and rc-3
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-platform/
>
>
You're pointing to the Apache NetBeans Platform, which is Apache NetBeans
(incubating) 9.0 Alpha.
The Apache NetBeans IDE, which is Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta, is
here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-java,
though please note that this is
HI, I know beside Github
This a link to all the releases for 9.0-beta, 9.0-beta-rc2 and rc-3
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-platform/
http://www-eu.apache.org/dist/incubator/netbeans/
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:24 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:12:29 +0100
Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Here it is, you can write back and ask again, but this will still be
> the tag of the rc3 which has been accepted as Apache NetBeans
> (incubating) 9.0 Beta:
>
>
Here it is, you can write back and ask again, but this will still be the
tag of the rc3 which has been accepted as Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0
Beta:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/9.0-beta-rc3
Gj
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:10 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:54:59 +0100
Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Yes, there is indeed another release pending soon -- that will always
> be the case. Right now, we're working on the final release of Apache
> NetBeans (incubating) 9.0, which will mean a new release.
Yes, there is indeed another release pending soon -- that will always be
the case. Right now, we're working on the final release of Apache NetBeans
(incubating) 9.0, which will mean a new release.
Gj
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:45 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Wed, 14
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:17:23 +0100
Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/9.0-beta-rc3
>
> There's the tag for rc3 i.e., the officially approved Apache NetBeans
> (incubating) 9.0 Beta.
I bumped my packages to that version
The tag is 9.0-beta-rc3, as stated at
http://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb90/nb90-beta.html
:-)
On 14/03/18 16:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/9.0-beta-rc3
There's the tag for rc3 i.e., the officially approved Apache NetBeans
(incubating) 9.0
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/9.0-beta-rc3
There's the tag for rc3 i.e., the officially approved Apache NetBeans
(incubating) 9.0 Beta.
Gj
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:51 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 09:29:54 -0400
> Emilian Bold
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 09:29:54 -0400
Emilian Bold wrote:
> Good catch. Yes, there should be a git tag for 9.0-beta, no? Or do we
> use 9.0-beta-rc3?
I could have sworn there was a 9.0-beta tag. I asked about releases a
few days back, no response. But there I mention I
Good catch. Yes, there should be a git tag for 9.0-beta, no? Or do we use
9.0-beta-rc3?
--emi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On 14 March 2018 12:23 PM, Christian Lenz <christian.l...@gmx.net> wrote:
> As I understand it right, NB 9.0 Beta is live, right? I mean real NB 9.0
>
As I understand it right, NB 9.0 Beta is live, right? I mean real NB 9.0 Beta,
not NB 9.0 Beta RC 3. If so, NB 9.0 Beta is missing as a release artefact at
the github Releases page. Only to let you know that. Maybe I’m wrong.
Cheers
Chris
18 matches
Mail list logo